Kuchimanchi Timmakavi
Prolific Telugu poet of the 18th century, called 'Abhinava Vaganusasana' (a new Nannaya). He wrote many long poems, among them the Rukmini Parinayamu and the Rasika Janamanobhiramamu, and a Ramayana and the Nilasundari Parinayamu in 'pure Telugu' without Sanskrit words. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao found his pure-Telugu poems unreadable; K. Sitaramaiya praised him as a scholar of great merit.
Kuchimanchi Timmakavi was a Telugu poet of the 18th century.1 He wrote a great many long poems.12 He was known by the title Abhinava Vaganusasana, “the new Vaganusasana”, a title of Nannaya.13 He is remembered especially for poems in “pure Telugu”, written without Sanskrit words.45
His works
P. Chenchiah and Raja M. Bhujanga Rao, in their history of Telugu literature (1928), list him among the poets who opened the 18th century.1 They name these of his works:4651
- the Rukmini Parinayamu (the marriage of Rukmini)
- the Rajasekhara Vilasamu and the Ballana Charitramu
- the Rasika Janamanobhiramamu, a poem written in imitation of the Vasucharitramu
- a Ramayana and the Nilasundari Parinayamu, both in pure Telugu4651
Charles Philip Brown listed the Rasika Janamanobhiramamu among the books quoted in his Telugu dictionary of 1852.7 He described it as “a poem in 5 books”.7
The pure-Telugu poems
Telugu poetry had always used many Sanskrit words.5 Some poets tried, as a feat, to write whole poems without them.5 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao counted Timmakavi’s Ramayana and Nilasundari Parinayamu among these.5 They praised the earlier pure-Telugu poem of Ponnikanti Telaganarya, but not these later ones.5 In their view the language of such poems was “unintelligible even to the pandit”.5 They compared them to “letters written in cypher, unmeaning without a key”.5
Where the sources disagree
- His merit. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao put his Rasika Janamanobhiramamu among the imitations of the Vasucharitramu that had “all its defects but none of its excellence”.6 K. Sitaramaiya, writing in Hyderabad in 1943, called Timmakavi “a very prolific writer and a scholar of great merit”.2 He also granted that the pure-Telugu poems were hard to read, but did not dismiss their authors’ services.8
Footnotes
-
Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (1928), p. 90 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
-
K. Sitaramaiya, A Hand Book of Telugu Literature (1943), p. 58 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2
-
P. Chenchiah and Raja M. Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (1928), p. 42 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩
-
P. Chenchiah and Raja M. Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (1928), p. 54 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (1928), p. 89 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9
-
Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (1928), p. 88 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Charles Philip Brown, A Dictionary, Telugu and English (1852), p. xii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2
-
Sitaramaiya, A Hand Book of Telugu Literature (1943), p. 59 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩
References
Notes (0)
Sources (3)
Spotted an error on this page? Tell us
Last updated: