A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Language & literature

From Prakrit inscriptions and the first Telugu records to Nannaya, Pothana, Vemana and modern prose.

Part of the long inscription cut on the rock of the Bommala Gutta: rows of closely spaced Telugu-Kannada letters on a rock surface painted red.
Part of the long inscription cut on the rock of the Bommala Gutta: rows of closely spaced Telugu-Kannada letters on a rock surface painted red. · P. Madhusudan (Wikimedia Commons) (opens in a new tab) · CC0 (opens in a new tab)

Telugu is one of the four major Dravidian languages of South India. Its written history begins later than its spoken one. For centuries the inscriptions of the Telugu country were cut in Prakrit and then Sanskrit. Only slowly did Telugu itself appear on stone, and then in books.1

This page follows that story from the earliest Prakrit records to the arguments about written and spoken Telugu in the twentieth century. It leans heavily on the first continuous history of the literature in English, written by P. Chenchiah and Raja M. Bhujanga Rao in 1928.1 Their dates, and their judgements of taste, are those of 1928, and where later finds or other writers disagree, the page says so.

Prakrit and Sanskrit before Telugu

The oldest writing in the region is not in Telugu. The edicts of the Mauryan emperor Asoka at Erragudi in Kurnool district are in Prakrit, in the Brahmi script.2 D. C. Sircar noticed that some lines run from right to left.2 It was as if the engraver were used to the Kharoshthi script of the north-west.2

The short Buddhist inscriptions on the Bhattiprolu caskets are in a Prakrit close to Pali.3 Their script is a kind of Brahmi that Georg Bühler dated no later than about 200 BCE.3

Prakrit remained the language of public record under the Satavahanas and the Ikshvakus.4 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao note that every inscription before the 11th century then known was in Prakrit or Sanskrit.4 The pillars at Nagarjunakonda carry Ikshvaku inscriptions “in Prakrit and in Brahmi characters”, as their editor J. Ph. Vogel put it.5

By the time of the Vishnukundins, the charters were in Sanskrit.6 The Salankayanas had already moved from Prakrit grants to Sanskrit ones.7 In the Sanskrit of the Chikkulla plates, F. Kielhorn spotted a Telugu-style plural, samvassarambul (“years”).6 He took it as proof that “the writer’s vernacular was Telugu”.6

Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao remark on a gap in memory. Telugu literature, they write, is silent about the Satavahana kings.8 The only echo is a tradition that a Satavahana king wrote or sponsored the Prakrit Saptasati.8 The poet Srinatha said he had translated it in his youth, but that version is now lost.8

The first Telugu records

When does written Telugu begin? Here the sources disagree, because new inscriptions kept turning up. In 1928 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao wrote that epigraphists had not found “any Telugu inscription earlier than A.D. 1020”.9

K. V. Lakshmana Rao, in the same year, published the Addanki inscription of Pandaranga, dated to about 844–5.10 It opens with a Telugu verse in the taruvoja metre.10 He saw in it “a positive evidence of the existence of Telugu poetry in the middle of the 9th century A.D.”.10 That was a century earlier than the Bezwada pillar of Yuddhamalla, then the oldest known.10

A further step back came with the Telugu Cholas of Renadu. In 1956 K. A. Nilakanta Sastri and M. Venkataramayya published twelve of their records.11 They placed them between the later 6th and the end of the 8th century. All were in early Telugu, in the script of the Badami Chalukyas.11

They called the Kalamalla pillar of about 575 one of the earliest wholly Telugu records yet found.12 Earlier Pallava records contain Telugu words, they noted, but this was the first complete inscription in the language.12 By then Telugu had begun to separate from Kannada, though the two still shared a script.12

Nannaya and the Telugu Mahabharata

Telugu literature, as distinct from inscriptions, begins with Nannaya (Nanniah).13 The Eastern Chalukya king Rajaraja Narendra (1022–63) of Rajahmundry commanded him to translate the Mahabharata.13 He translated the first two books and part of the third.13 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao describe him as a Vaidiki Brahmin from Tanuku and the king’s family priest.13 The Godavari gazetteer adds that “the earliest mention of Rajahmundry in any extant literature” is in Nannaya’s introduction.14

An inscription gives a fixed point. The Nandamapundi grant of 1053 names the author of its Sanskrit verses as Nanniyabhatta.15 E. Hultzsch thought him “perhaps identical” with the poet.15 The grant praises the man who received it, Narayana, for verse in “the Samskrita, Karnata, Prakrita, Paisachika and Andhra languages”.16 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao identify him with the Narayana Bhatta whom Nannaya thanked as his helper.16

The translation took three centuries to finish. Tikkana completed fifteen books in the 13th century.17 Errana (Errapragada) completed the rest of the third book in the 14th.17 Later poets honoured the three as the Kavitraya, “the Great Three”.17

Tradition also makes Nannaya the first grammarian.18 It credits him with the Andhra Sabda Chintamani, a Sanskrit grammar of Telugu.18 But Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao doubted that he wrote it.18 In 1922 the Andhra Historical Research Society at Rajahmundry marked the ninth centenary of Rajaraja’s accession.19 It called him the patron of “the first extant literary composition”.19

Was there Telugu writing before Nannaya? Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao weighed the theory that a Jain literature had been destroyed. They found no evidence for it.20 They proposed instead two streams of poetry.20 One was an older, oral desi poetry of songs, proverbs and ballads. The other was a Sanskrit-based margi court poetry, which Nannaya founded or helped to found.20

Their list of desi forms runs from cradle songs and harvest songs to “sagas of local chiefs”.21 That theme is taken up on the page Folk songs & oral traditions.21

The Kakatiya age

Under the Kakatiyas, Telugu writing spread inland. P. Sreenivasachar edited the Telangana inscriptions.22 He called the period an important time for Telugu literature and Sanskrit learning.22 He noted that some records begin with the grant itself in Telugu prose, and add the Sanskrit verse as a kind of appendix.22 An example is the Hanamkonda inscription of 1163.22

Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao call the literature of the 12th century “pronouncedly Virasaiva”.23 Its chief writer was Palkuriki Somanatha, author of the Telugu Basava Purana and Panditaradhya Charitra.23

Tikkana was a Niyogi Brahmin and minister to the Nellore chief Manumasiddhi.24 He went as the chief’s envoy to the Kakatiya Ganapatideva.24 Before his Mahabharata, he wrote the Nirvachanottara Ramayana, entirely in verse.24 The Ranganatha Ramayana is in two-line dvipada couplets.25 In Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao’s judgement, it was probably the work of a chief named Buddha Raju, not of the poet whose name it bears.25

Grammar and prose came too. Ketana translated Dandin’s Dasakumaracharita.26 He wrote a Telugu grammar, the Andhra Bhasha Bhushana, and put the Mitakshara law commentary into Telugu.26 Atharvana wrote a Telugu grammar in Sanskrit. In their view he was “the only Jain writer” in the surviving literature.27 Under Prataparudra, Vidyanatha wrote the Sanskrit work on poetics, the Prataparudriya.28

The dating of all this is not settled.29 In 1852 C. P. Brown put Somanatha’s Basava Purana at about 1300.29 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao place him in the 12th century.29

Reddis, Srinatha and Pothana

After the fall of Warangal, the Reddis of Kondavidu became the great patrons on the coast. Errana dedicated his Harivamsa to their founder, Prolaya Vema Reddi.30 The Kistna manual calls the Kondavidu Reddis “great patrons of Telugu literature”.31

Their court poet was Srinatha (about 1365–1440).32 He translated Sriharsha’s difficult Sanskrit Naishadha.32 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao rank him with the Kavitraya.32 They also credit him with two other works.33 One is the Palnati Vira Charitra, which they describe as a romance of love and war among local chiefs.33 The other is the Vidhinataka, light verse on the street life of Rajahmundry.33

Bammera Pothana (Potana) translated the Bhagavata Purana. In tradition he was Srinatha’s brother-in-law.34 Two episodes, Gajendra Moksha and Rukmini Kalyana, became, they write, “perhaps the most widely read and recited portions in Telugu literature”.34

Pothana’s birthplace is disputed between Warangal and Ontimitta in Kadapa (then Cuddapah).35 A story says that he refused to dedicate the poem to the Padma Nayaka chief Singama, and offered it to Rama instead. This story is tradition.35

Another work set in Telangana is Vinukonda Vallabha’s Kridabhiramamu.36 It is a tour of the streets of Warangal that includes a cock-fight.36 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao counted it the first Telugu translation of a Sanskrit play as a play.36

Vijayanagara and the prabandha

The reign of Krishnadeva Raya of Vijayanagara (1509–30) opened what Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao call the prabandha (long narrative poem) period.37 Poets now built long, ornate story poems around a slight tale from the Puranas.37

The king himself wrote the Amuktamalyada, the story of the Vaishnava saint-poet of Srivilliputtur.38 They treat it as a sign of Vaishnavism’s new hold on Telugu poetry.38 Brown’s dictionary, however, lists the same poem under the name of Allasani Peddana. So even its authorship has been questioned.39

Eight court poets, the Ashtadiggajas, were credited to the king.40 But Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao note that the last three were later.40 Peddana’s Manucharitra became the model prabandha.41 Tradition says the king carried a pole of his palanquin.41 In 1927 the catalogue of the Madras government’s Telugu manuscripts gave this poem alone twenty-two entries (Nos. 619–640).41

Molla, a woman of the potter caste, wrote a Ramayana.42 They called it the most widely read of all the Telugu versions.42 Tenali Ramakrishna is remembered as a court jester.43 He was also the author of the Panduranga Mahatmya, one of the “five great kavyas”.43

Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao saw the 17th to 19th centuries as a long decline, an age of clever but empty verse.44 They make two exceptions. The Telugu courts of the south, at Tanjore and Madurai, developed prose.45 They wrote more plays in one century than the northern poets had in eight.45 And a large popular literature flourished outside the courts.

Golconda: Telugu, Persian and Dakhni

Persian was the language of the Qutb Shahi court, but its sultans did not ignore Telugu. Addanki Gangadhara dedicated his Tapati-samvaranopakhyanamu to Ibrahim Qutb Shah.46 Hirananda Sastri dates Ibrahim to 1550–1581.46

Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao add Ponnikanti Telaganarya’s Yayati Charitra, written in “pure Telugu” without Sanskrit words.47 They call these “the only kavyas in Telugu literature dedicated to a Muhammadan ruler”.47 They repeat the story that Ibrahim had lived as a refugee at Vijayanagara.47

The same court shaped a new literary language. Muhammad Quli Qutb Shah wrote Persian and Urdu poetry under the pen-name “Qutbshah”.48 Bilgrami records that the Sufi Miranji Khuda Numa, who died in 1659, wrote two books on spiritual matters “in the old Urdu language of the Deccan”.49

At Golconda fort, the Musa Burj bastion was completed in 1666–67.50 It carries its Persian building record with a Telugu translation beside it.50 Brown observed in 1852 that educated Muslims of the south wrote letters in Persian.51 Yet “every native Musulman learns the vernacular of those among whom he resides”.51

Alongside the court epics ran the sataka. It is a “century” of separate verses, each ending in a fixed refrain.52 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao counted about six hundred, three-quarters of them religious or moral.52 The earliest they knew was Somanatha’s Vrishadhipa Sataka of about 1180.52

The Sumati Sataka is credited to Baddena, a chief of the Kakatiya era.53 It and the verses of Vemana became the moral primers of Telugu schools.53 Devotional satakas include the Dasarathi Sataka of Kancherla Gopanna, the Rama devotee of Bhadrachalam.54

Vemana’s date is uncertain. Brown began collecting his verses at Machilipatnam (then Masulipatam) in 1824.55 He found manuscripts “full of errors of every kind”, and no two arranged alike.55 From copies gathered at Visakhapatnam, Nellore, Guntur, Kadapa and Madras, he sifted about two thousand stanzas.55

Brown recorded that Vemana was a kapu (farmer) by birth.56 He guessed that Vemana had become a Jangam (Virashaiva priest).56 He wrote that Vemana was believed to have lived “about the beginning of the seventeenth century”.56 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao preferred the early 15th century. But they admitted that no date could be fixed even roughly.56

Much popular poetry was meant to be sung. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao single out the kirtanas (devotional songs) of Tyagaraja.57 They also single out the love-songs called javalis, looked down on because public women sang them.57 K. Sitaramaiya names Kshetrayya, who lived at the time of Vijayaraghava Nayak of Thanjavur (then Tanjore).58 His Telugu padams were still widely sung.58 These songs belong as much to music as to literature, and are treated on the page Music & dance.

Other traditions entered Telugu verse too. Pingali Ellanarya wrote a poem on the life of St Thomas.59 It was drawn from an account his patron’s family had received from a teacher.59 About 1750 Mangalagiri Anandakavi wrote the Vedanta Rasayana, a life of Christ.59 By contrast, Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao found no Muslim writers of Telugu before modern times.60 They named only Ummar Ali Shah and a sataka poet, Ganganapalli Hussain.60

Colonial scholarship and print

In the early 19th century, European scholars began to describe the language. H. H. Wilson published the catalogue of Colin Mackenzie’s manuscripts in 1828.61 It quotes the views of Mr Babington and the late Mr Ellis: “Neither the Tamul, the Telugu nor any of their cognate dialects are derivations from the Sanscrit.”61

Telugu, Wilson concluded, “is not a mere derivative from Sanscrit, but has an independant origin”.62 But its literature was “largely indebted” to Sanskrit.62 His dating shows how little was then known. He thought no Telugu work was older than the end of the 12th century.63 He put Nannaya late in the 13th.63

Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao took the opposite line a century later. They held, with the Telugu grammarians, that the language was formed by changing Sanskrit and Prakrit.64 Dr Caldwell’s Dravidian theory, they allowed, might fit its origins, but not its later form.64

Charles Philip Brown published A Dictionary, Telugu and English in 1852. It explained both “the colloquial style used in business and the poetical dialect”.65 He noted that every southern language had “a poetical and a vernacular dialect”.65 He complained that some pandits wanted a “pedantic style; which is admired because conceited and far from clear”.66

Printing among the Telugus, Brown wrote, began about 1806, but made little progress until 1830.67 He also paid for a corrected edition of Pothana’s Bhagavata in 1827.68 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao credited the Brown and Mackenzie collections, and the Government Oriental Manuscripts Library at Madras, with saving many texts.69 In 1929 the Madras government refused to hand that library’s Telugu manuscripts over to the new Andhra University.70

Veeresalingam, the novel and the language question

In Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao’s account, modern Telugu prose and the Telugu novel begin with Kandukuri Veeresalingam of Rajahmundry.71 His Rajasekhara Charitra was adapted from Goldsmith’s Vicar of Wakefield.71 His biographer D. Anjaneyulu notes earlier claims to the title of first Telugu novel.72 But he calls it the first social novel in the language.72

Veeresalingam also wrote farces and translated Lamb’s Tales from Shakespeare.73 His Andhra Kavula Charitra (lives of the Telugu poets) remained a standard reference.73

The sharpest dispute of the early 20th century was over language.74 Should books be written in the classical literary style (grandhika), or in the language people spoke? Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao describe it as “an acrimonious battle of words”.74

K. Sitaramaiya wrote in Hyderabad in 1943.75 He names Gidugu Ramamurti as the leader of the spoken-Telugu movement, with Gurajada Apparao.75 A book in the spoken style was prescribed as a textbook. In reply, he writes, the orthodox founded the Andhra Sahitya Parishat.75 In the end, the universities came to accept the spoken (vyavaharika) style.75 Gidugu also learned the language of the Savaras of the Visakhapatnam hills and made an alphabet for it.76

Gurajada wrote the social play Kanyasulkam.77 Its 1909 preface said it was written partly to disprove the idea that Telugu was unsuited to the stage.77 A “new poetry” of lyric and nature verse followed. In both accounts, Rayaprolu Subba Rao led the way.78 Newspapers and magazines took over the patronage once held by courts and zamindars (landholders).79 Among them were the Andhra Patrika, Bharati and the Andhra Parishad Patrika.79

Telugu in Hyderabad State

In the Nizam’s dominions, Telugu was the largest language, but not the language of government. The 1931 census found that Telugu covered “nearly half the area of these Dominions”.80 It also recorded the founding of Osmania University in 1918, teaching in Urdu.81 Urdu was defended as “the cultural and official language of the State”.81 Sitaramaiya notes that Rayaprolu Subba Rao was invited to hold Osmania’s newly created Telugu chair in 1918–19.82

Telugu public life in Telangana grew around libraries.83 The Sri Krishnadevaraya Andhra Bhasha Nilayam opened in Hyderabad in 1901.83 Libraries followed at Warangal (1904) and Secunderabad (1905).83 The Vignana Chandrika Mandali of Komarraju Lakshmana Rao published books.83 It ran prize competitions in history, science and novel-writing, and began a Telugu encyclopaedia.83

In November 1921, a delegate tried to move a resolution in Telugu at a conference in Hyderabad.84 He was shouted down.84 That night, Sarojini Regani relates, a dozen Telugu members founded the Andhra Jana Sangham.84 The story of these movements is told on the page Reform, freedom & people’s movements.

By 1951 Telugu was the mother tongue of 47.8 per cent of Hyderabad State.85 It was the majority language in all eight eastern (Telangana) districts.85 Urdu, at 11.6 per cent of the state, was concentrated in the towns.85 In the Madras Presidency, the 1901 census had counted over fourteen million Telugu speakers.86 The Telugu-speaking states formed in 1953 and 1956 are described on the page Andhra State & Andhra Pradesh.

What this page does not cover

About the sources. The library behind this site is strong on inscriptions and on the classical poets, and thin elsewhere. It has no source used here on Telugu literature after about 1950: the poets, novelists and journalists of independent Andhra Pradesh are not covered. The Tallapaka poets are treated only on the page on Annamacharya, and the Telugu court of Tanjore only on the pages on its poets, such as Raghunatha Nayaka. Dakhni Urdu literature, the tribal languages of the Godavari and Visakhapatnam (then Vizagapatam) hills, and the Telugu literature of the courts at Madurai and Mysore appear only in passing or not at all.

Footnotes

  1. P. Chenchiah and Raja M. Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (1928), preface, PDF p. 17 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)), and p. 13 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  2. D. C. Sircar, “Erragudi Edicts of Asoka”, Epigraphia Indica XXXII (1959), p. 4 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  3. G. Bühler, “The Bhattiprolu Inscriptions”, Epigraphia Indica II (1894), p. 323 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  4. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 16 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  5. J. Ph. Vogel, “Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist Site at Nagarjunikonda”, Epigraphia Indica XX (1933), p. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  6. F. Kielhorn, “Chikkulla Plates of Vikramendravarman II”, Epigraphia Indica IV (1897), p. 194 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  7. R. Subba Rao, “Pedavegi Copper-plates of Nandivarman II”, Journal of the Andhra Historical Research Society I, pt. 2 (1926), p. 96 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  8. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao, History of Telugu Literature (1928), pp. 20–21 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  9. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 37 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  10. K. V. Lakshmana Rao, “The Addanki Stone Inscription of Pandaranga”, Epigraphia Indica XIX (1928), p. 273 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  11. K. A. Nilakanta Sastri and M. Venkataramayya, “Telugu Chola Records from Anantapur and Cuddapah”, Epigraphia Indica XXVII (1956), p. 220 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  12. Nilakanta Sastri and Venkataramayya, “Telugu Chola Records” (1956), p. 221 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  13. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 22, 42 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  14. F. R. Hemingway, Madras District Gazetteers: Godavari (1907), p. 243 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); see also p. 21 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  15. E. Hultzsch, editorial note in F. Kielhorn, “Nandamapundi Grant of Rajaraja I”, Epigraphia Indica IV (1897), p. 303 n. 3 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  16. Kielhorn, “Nandamapundi Grant” (1897), p. 302 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 43–44 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  17. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 42, 46, 48 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  18. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 43 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  19. Journal of the Andhra Historical Research Society, Vol. I (1926), p. 4, PDF p. 15 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  20. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 37–39 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  21. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 40 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  22. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts, Part I (1942), pp. 7–8 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  23. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 23–24, 51–52 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  24. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 46 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  25. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 54–55 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  26. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 56 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  27. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 55 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  28. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 23–24 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); Sreenivasachar, Corpus, Part I (1942), p. 7 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  29. Charles Philip Brown, A Dictionary, Telugu and English (1852), p. viii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 51 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  30. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 24, 48 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  31. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District (1883), pp. 10–11 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  32. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 25, 59–60 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  33. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 60 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  34. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 64 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  35. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 25, 63–64 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  36. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 66 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  37. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 69–70 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  38. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 70–71 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  39. Brown, Dictionary (1852), p. vii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  40. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 26, 72 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  41. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 72, 74 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); S. Kuppuswami Sastri, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Telugu Manuscripts in the Government Oriental Manuscripts Library, Madras, Vol. II (1927), contents, Nos. 619–640, PDF p. 6 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  42. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 77, 103 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  43. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 83 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  44. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 86 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  45. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 93–94 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  46. Hirananda Sastri, Shitab Khan of Warangal (1932), p. 12 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  47. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 84 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  48. Syed Ali Asgar Bilgrami, Landmarks of the Deccan (1927), p. 132 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  49. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), pp. 61–62 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  50. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), p. 153 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  51. Brown, Dictionary (1852), p. iii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  52. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 98–99 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  53. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 56–57, 99 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  54. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 99–100 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  55. Charles Philip Brown (tr.), The Verses of Vemana (1829; reprint 1911), preface, PDF p. 5 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  56. Brown, Verses of Vemana, preface, PDF p. 6 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 99 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  57. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 100 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  58. K. Sitaramaiya, A Hand Book of Telugu Literature (1943), p. 56 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  59. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 105–106 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  60. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 107 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  61. H. H. Wilson, The Mackenzie Collection (1828), Vol. I, p. xxix (PDF p. 32) (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  62. Wilson, Mackenzie Collection (1828), pp. xxxvii–xxxviii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  63. Wilson, Mackenzie Collection (1828), p. xxxviii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  64. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 15–16 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  65. Brown, Dictionary (1852), title page and p. iv (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  66. Brown, Dictionary (1852), preface, PDF p. 10 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  67. Brown, Dictionary (1852), p. iv (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  68. Brown, Dictionary (1852), p. viii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  69. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 110 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  70. Madras Legislative Council: Questions and Answers, 29 January 1929, pp. 207–208 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  71. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 116–117 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  72. D. Anjaneyulu, Kandukuri Veeresalingam (1976), p. 88 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  73. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), pp. 110, 113, 115 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  74. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 109 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  75. Sitaramaiya, Hand Book of Telugu Literature (1943), pp. 79–80, 86–89 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  76. Sitaramaiya (1943), p. 88 n. 2 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  77. Sitaramaiya (1943), p. 90 and n. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  78. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 117 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); Sitaramaiya (1943), pp. 90–91 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  79. Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao (1928), p. 119 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  80. Census of India 1931, Vol. XXIII: H.E.H. the Nizam’s Dominions, Part I: Report (1933), p. 222 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  81. Census of India 1931, Vol. XXIII, Part I (1933), pp. 216–217 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  82. Sitaramaiya (1943), p. 91 n. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  83. The Freedom Struggle in Hyderabad, Vol. III (1957), pp. 151–152 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  84. Sarojini Regani, Highlights of the Freedom Movement in Andhra Pradesh (1956), pp. 177–178 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  85. Census of India, 1951, Vol. IX: Hyderabad, Part I-A: Report (1953), pp. 404–406 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  86. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 29 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

Photos

Show all (16)

References

Sources (26)
  1. Not Available, The Andhra Historical Research Society, Rajahmundry, Vol.1,pt.2 (opens in a new tab), 1926, pp. 96. R. Subba Rao, Pedavegi Copper-plates of Nandivarman II (JAHRS I, 1926). [Public domain]
  2. P. Chenchiah and Raja M. Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (The Heritage of India Series) (opens in a new tab), Association Press (Y.M.C.A.), Calcutta / Oxford University Press, London, 1928, preface, 15–16, 20–27, 37–40, 42–44, 46, 48, 50–52, 54–56, 59–60, 63–64, 66, 69–74, 77, 83–84, 86, 93–94, 98–100, 103, 105–107, 109–110, 113–117, 119. [Public domain]
  3. Jas. Burgess (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. II (1894) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1894, pp. 323. G. Bühler, The Bhattiprolu Inscriptions. [Public domain]
  4. F. Kielhorn (articles); E. Hultzsch (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. IV (1896–97) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1897, pp. 194, 302–303. F. Kielhorn, Chikkulla Plates of Vikramendravarman II; Nandamapundi Grant of Rajaraja I. [Public domain]
  5. Hirananda Sastri (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XIX (1927–28) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1928, pp. 273. K. V. Lakshmana Rao, The Addanki Stone Inscription of Pandaranga. [Public domain]
  6. Hirananda Sastri (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XX (1929–30) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1933, pp. 1. J. Ph. Vogel, Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist Site at Nagarjunikonda. [Public domain]
  7. B. Ch. Chhabra and N. Lakshminarayan Rao (eds.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXVII (1947–48) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1956, pp. 220–221. K. A. Nilakanta Sastri and M. Venkataramayya, Telugu Chola Records from Anantapur and Cuddapah. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  8. D. C. Sircar and B. Ch. Chhabra (eds.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXXII (1957–58) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1959, pp. 4. D. C. Sircar, Erragudi Edicts of Asoka. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  9. F. R. Hemingway, Madras District Gazetteers: Godavari, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1907, pp. 21, 243. [Public domain]
  10. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions, Part I (Hyderabad Archaeological Series No. 13) (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1942, pp. 7–8. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  11. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District in the Presidency of Madras (opens in a new tab), Government of Madras (Lawrence Asylum Press), 1883, pp. 10–11. [Public domain]
  12. Hirananda Sastri, Shitab Khan of Warangal (Hyderabad Archaeological Series No. 9) (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1932, pp. 12. [Public domain]
  13. Syed Ali Asgar Bilgrami, Landmarks of the Deccan: A Comprehensive Guide to the Archaeological Remains of the City and Suburbs of Hyderabad (opens in a new tab), Government Central Press, Hyderabad-Deccan, 1927, pp. 61–62, 132, 153. [Public domain]
  14. H. H. Wilson, The Mackenzie Collection: A Descriptive Catalogue of the Oriental Manuscripts of the South of India, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Asiatic Press, Calcutta, 1828, xxix, xxxvii–xxxviii. [Public domain]
  15. Charles Philip Brown, A Dictionary, Telugu and English, Explaining the Colloquial Style Used in Business and the Poetical Dialect (opens in a new tab), Christian Knowledge Society's Press, Madras, 1852, iii–v, vii–viii. [Public domain]
  16. Charles Philip Brown (tr.), The Verses of Vemana: Moral, Religious and Satirical (opens in a new tab), V. Ramaswamy Sastrulu & Sons, Madras, 1911, preface (PDF pp. 5–6). Reprint of Brown's 1829 translation and preface. [Public domain]
  17. ఎస్ కుప్పుస్వామిశాస్త్రి(సం.), తెలుగు రాతప్రతుల వివరణాత్మక కేటలాగ్-ప్రభుత్వ ప్రాచ్య వ్రాతప్రతుల గ్రంథాలయము 2వ సంపుటము ప్రబంధములు శృంగార ప్రబంధములు(రెండవ భాగము) (A Descriptive Catalogue Of The Telugu Manuscripts Vol II) (opens in a new tab), 1927, contents (PDF p. 6). [Public domain]
  18. Tamil Nadu Legislative Council, Presentation of the Telugu manuscripts in the Oriental Manuscripts Library to the Andhra University (opens in a new tab), 1929, pp. 207–208. [Public domain]
  19. Not Available, The Andhra Historical Research Society, Rajahmundry, Vol.1,pt.2 (opens in a new tab), 1926, PDF p. 15. [Public domain]
  20. D. Anjaneyulu, Kandukuri Veeresalingam (opens in a new tab), Publications Division, Government of India, 1976, pp. 88. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  21. K. Sitaramaiya, A Hand Book of Telugu Literature (opens in a new tab), Hyderabad Telugu Academy, Hyderabad (Deccan), 1943, preface, 56, 79–80, 86–91. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  22. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Madras, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1908, pp. 29. [Public domain]
  23. Khan, Gulam Ahmad, Census of India 1931 vol.23 H.E.H. the Nizamʼs dominions (Hyderabad State); pt.1- Report (opens in a new tab), 1933, pp. 216–217, 222. [Public domain]
  24. Hyderabad State Committee Appointed for the Compilation of a History of the Freedom Movement, The Freedom Struggle in Hyderabad: A Connected Account, Vol. III (1885-1920) (opens in a new tab), Hyderabad State Committee, Hyderabad, 1957, pp. 151–152. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  25. Sarojini Regani, Highlights of the Freedom Movement in Andhra Pradesh (opens in a new tab), Ministry of Cultural Affairs, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, 1956, pp. 177–178. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  26. C. K. Murthy, Census of India, 1951, Vol. IX: Hyderabad, Part I-A - Report (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Hyderabad-Dn., 1953, pp. 404–406. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: