Paravastu Chinnaya Suri

Paravastu Chinnaya Suri (1807–1861) was a Telugu scholar and teacher at the Presidency College, Madras. His Bala Vyakaranamu (about 1855) became the standard grammar of literary Telugu, and his Niti Chandrika retold Panchatantra stories in a classical prose style. Later writers praise his grammar but some blame his heavy style for holding back modern Telugu prose.

Paravastu Chinnaya Suri was a Telugu scholar of the 19th century who taught Telugu at the Presidency College in Madras.1 His grammar, the Bala Vyakaranamu, became the standard rule book of literary Telugu.12 It was still the standard in 1943, nearly ninety years after he wrote it.2 See Telugu grammar.

A teacher at Madras

K. Purushotham gives his years as 1807–1861.3 Khandavalli Lakshmiranjanam and Khandavalli Balendusekharam describe him as a great scholar who became Telugu teacher at the Presidency College, Madras.1 They place his work in the time when the labours of C. P. Brown were stirring a new interest among Telugu scholars.1

The Bala Vyakaranamu

According to Lakshmiranjanam, Chinnaya Suri wrote the Bala Vyakaranamu (“grammar for the young”) about 1855.1 He based it on the Andhra Sabda Chintamani and other old grammars.1 Before his time, they add, people often wrote prose in the spoken language. From Chinnaya Suri onward, prose too had to follow the rules of the literary language, like poetry.1

In 1943 K. Sitaramaiya called it “the standard orthodox Telugu grammar to this day”.2 The British Museum catalogue of Telugu books (1912) also lists his Vibhakti-bodhini, tables of the endings of Telugu words.4

The Niti Chandrika

Chinnaya Suri also wrote prose. Sitaramaiya says his Niti Chandrika was written to show the rules of his grammar in use.2 The British Museum catalogue describes its first part as a retelling of the Mitra-labhamu and Mitra-bhedamu, the first two books of the Panchatantra, joined with the Hitopadesa.5 It was later set as a text for the Matriculation examination.5

He did not finish it. The catalogue lists continuations by Kokkonda Venkataratnam and Kandukuri Veeresalingam.5 D. Anjaneyulu says Veeresalingam wrote his parts, Vigraham and Sandhi, in Chinnaya Suri’s “florid and highflown” style, and nearly outdid him at it.6

In 1935 Andhra University set the Niti Chandrika for its students. It used a reprint of the first edition of 1857, with notes by G. V. Ramamurthi Pantulu of Parlakimedi.7

Other works

The British Museum catalogue lists other works by him:5

  • an edition of the Nala Charitramu (printed 1864)
  • a Telugu translation of T. L. Strange’s book on Hindu law, the Hindu Dharma Sastra Sangrahamu (1858)5

What later writers said

Sitaramaiya called him “a great name in the domain of Telugu literature”.2 Lakshmiranjanam wrote that the influence of the Bala Vyakaranamu on the later growth of the language was immense.1

K. Purushotham, writing on Telugu short stories in 2020, was harsh. He calls the Niti Chandrika pedantic, and hard for the less educated to read.3 He quotes the translator Ranga Rao, who thought Chinnaya Suri’s style set literary Telugu back by fifty years.3

Where the sources disagree

When the Niti Chandrika first appeared. Purushotham dates it to 1853.3 The Andhra University register of 1935–36 speaks of its “first edition of 1857”.7

His legacy. Sitaramaiya and Lakshmiranjanam treat his grammar as the lasting standard of Telugu.21 Purushotham, following Ranga Rao, sees his style as a burden that held Telugu prose back.3

Footnotes

  1. Khandavalli Lakshmiranjanam and Khandavalli Balendusekharam, Andhrula Charitra – Samskriti, 2nd ed. (1957), p. 414 (in Telugu) (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9

  2. K. Sitaramaiya, A Hand Book of Telugu Literature (1943), p. 62 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  3. K. Purushotham, “From Social Reform to Dandora: A Critical Perspective of Telugu Dalit Short Stories in Historical Outline”, Kakatiya Journal of Historical Studies, Vol. XV, No. 1 (2020), p. 2 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  4. Barnett, Catalogue of the Telugu Books in the British Museum (1912), cols. 51–52 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  5. L. D. Barnett, A Catalogue of the Telugu Books in the Library of the British Museum (1912), cols. 49–50, “Chinnaya Suri, Paravastu” (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  6. D. Anjaneyulu, Kandukuri Veeresalingam (1976), p. 100 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩

  7. Andhra University: The Annual Register 1935–36 (1935), p. 118 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2

References

Sources (6)
  1. Khandavalli Lakshmiranjanam and Khandavalli Balendusekharam, Andhrula Charitra - Samskriti (ఆంధ్రుల చరిత్ర - సంస్కృతి), 2nd ed. (opens in a new tab), Bala Saraswati Book Depot, Kurnool and Madras, 1957, pp. 414. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  2. K. Sitaramaiya, A Hand Book of Telugu Literature (opens in a new tab), Hyderabad Telugu Academy, Hyderabad (Deccan), 1943, pp. 62. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  3. D. Anjaneyulu, Kandukuri Veeresalingam (opens in a new tab), Publications Division, Government of India, 1976, pp. 100. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  4. Andhra University, Andhra University: The Annual Register 1935-36 (opens in a new tab), Vani Press, Bezwada, 1935, pp. 118. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  5. K. Purushotham (article); Thallapally Manohar (ed.), Kakatiya Journal of Historical Studies, Vol. XV, No. 1 (2020), incl. K. Purushotham, 'From Social Reform to Dandora: A Critical Perspective of Telugu Dalit Short Stories in Historical Outline', pp. 1-11 (opens in a new tab), 2020, pp. 2. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  6. L. D. Barnett, A Catalogue of the Telugu Books in the Library of the British Museum (opens in a new tab), British Museum, London, 1912, cols. 49–52. [Public domain]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: