Bottu-Beta (Chalukya of Mudigonda)

Bottu-Beta was a Mudigonda Chalukya chief, the father of Kusumaditya and Nagati in the Kukkunur plates. A Telugu inscription at Gudur says that the Viriyala chief Erra killed his enemy and set him up as ruler of the Koravi country while he was still a boy. Bh. Lakshminarayana took the two Bottu-Betas to be one man, a contemporary of the Kakatiya Beta II, and placed him about 1110–1140. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry held that the Bottu-Beta of Gudur was an earlier chief of about 1000.

Bottu-Beta was a chief of the Chalukyas of Mudigonda, whose family ruled the Koravi (Kuravi) country.1 He is named in the Kukkunur plates of his son Kusumaditya.1 A Telugu inscription at Gudur tells how a neighbouring chief put him on his throne, but scholars disagree about whether the two records mean the same man.23

Family

According to the Kukkunur plates, Bottu-Beta was the son of a Kusumayudha who had the title Mutt-anegalla.1 By his queen Mahadevi he had two sons, Kusumaditya and Nagati.1 P. V. Parabrahma Sastry gave the queen’s name as Abhinava-gauri in his table of the family.4

Bottu was the family’s name, not part of his own name, in Parabrahma Sastry’s view.53 He thought the family moved its capital from Koravi to a place called Bottu, which has not been identified, and then took that name.5

The Gudur inscription

P. Sreenivasachar published the Gudur inscription of Kamasani in 1942.6 Its Telugu verses praise Erra of the Viriyala family, born in the Durjaya line.67 In Sreenivasachar’s translation, Erra “took up the cause of Bottu-Beta, killed his enemy violently”, and established him in the Koravi country.7 The verse adds that Erra was then ruling some villages “in the name of that boy”, so Bottu-Beta was still young.7

The next verse turns to the Kakatiyas. Erra and his wife Kamasani helped the young Kakatiya chief Beta and won him the emperor’s favour.7 The record does not name Bottu-Beta’s enemy.7 See the Gudur inscriptions and Gudur.

One Bottu-Beta or two?

Bh. Lakshminarayana, who edited the Kukkunur plates in 1974, held that the Bottu-Beta of Gudur was Kusumaditya’s father.2 Some earlier writers, among them Vedam Venkataraya Sastri, had taken Bottu-Beta to be the Kakatiya Beta II himself. Lakshminarayana rejected this, because the Kukkunur plates show the Mudigonda line going on after Kusumayudha IV.2 In his view Bottu-Beta and the Kakatiya Beta were two men who lived at the same time, under the Chalukya king Vikramaditya VI.2 Counting twenty-five years a reign, he placed Bottu-Beta about 1110–1140.8

Parabrahma Sastry disagreed.93 The Gudur record is dated 1124, but its donor Malla was the great-grandson of Erra.9 So the verse tells of events about four generations earlier.9 Parabrahma Sastry made its Kakatiya Beta the chief Beta I, who lived until about 1052.3 He concluded that the Bottu-Beta of Gudur was an earlier chief of the same name, left out of the Kukkunur list, and dated his restoration to about 1000 or a little before.310 He suggested that this chief’s father may have been driven out of Koravi by the Kakatiya Gunda IV.511

Where the sources disagree

  • Which Bottu-Beta Erra helped. Lakshminarayana said the father of Kusumaditya.2 Parabrahma Sastry said an earlier chief of the same name.3
  • Which Kakatiya Beta lived at the same time. Lakshminarayana said Beta II, under Vikramaditya VI.2 Parabrahma Sastry said Beta I.3
  • His dates. Lakshminarayana placed Kusumaditya’s father about 1110–1140.8 Parabrahma Sastry placed the Gudur events about 1000.10

Footnotes

  1. Gajjala Vasanta Lakshmi (ed.), Epigraphia Telanganica I: Pre-Kakatiya Telangana (2023), p. 353, reprinting Bh. Lakshminarayana, “Kukkunuru Plates of Kusumadya”, Epigraphia Andhrica II (1974), pp. 39–49. Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  2. Epigraphia Telanganica I (2023), p. 354, reprinting Lakshminarayana (1974). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  3. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 55. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  4. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 53, genealogical table. ↩

  5. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 41. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  6. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of H.E.H. the Nizam’s Dominions, Part II (1942), p. 78, No. 23, “Gudur Inscription of Kamasani” (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  7. Sreenivasachar, Corpus, Part II (1942), p. 79, translation, verses 3–4 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  8. Epigraphia Telanganica I (2023), p. 355, reprinting Lakshminarayana (1974). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2

  9. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 54. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  10. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 56. ↩ ↩2

  11. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 42. ↩

References

Sources (3)
  1. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions, Part II: Texts and Translations (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1940, pp. 78–79. Gudur inscription of Kamasani. [Public domain in India]
  2. Gajjala Vasanta Lakshmi (ed.); Gautam Pingle (gen. ed.), Epigraphia Telanganica, Vol. 1: Pre-Kakatiya Telangana, Dr MCR Human Resource Development Institute, Government of Telangana, 2023, pp. 353–355. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  3. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal, Government of Andhra Pradesh, 1978, pp. 41–42, 53–56. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: