A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Inscriptions & sources

How we know: inscriptions, coins, travellers' accounts, the Mackenzie kaifiyats and archives.

Part of the long inscription cut on the rock of the Bommala Gutta: rows of closely spaced Telugu-Kannada letters on a rock surface painted red.
Part of the long inscription cut on the rock of the Bommala Gutta: rows of closely spaced Telugu-Kannada letters on a rock surface painted red. · P. Madhusudan (Wikimedia Commons) (opens in a new tab) · CC0 (opens in a new tab)

About the sources. Almost everything on this site rests on a few kinds of evidence. These are words cut in stone or copper, coins, the reports of visitors from abroad, chronicles and local histories written down long after the events, and the records of modern governments. This page describes each kind, how it came to be collected, and what it can and cannot tell us. The individual records have their own pages in the inscriptions section, and every work cited on the site is listed under sources.

Inscriptions

Inscriptions are the backbone of the early and medieval history of the Telugu country.1 Most were found by chance. The Erragudi edicts of Asoka were noticed at the end of 1928 by a geologist looking for minerals in Kurnool district.2 He recognised the words Devanam… Piyadasi, a title of Asoka.2

The Chikkulla plates of the Vishnukundin king Vikramendravarman II were dug up at a village tank.3 The finder’s wife offered them for sale. The village accountant got them for the Collector.3

The Kotagiri plates of Rudramadevi’s reign were found by a fisherman in a tank in Bodhan taluk.4 The police handed them in as unclaimed property, and so they reached the Nizam’s archaeologists.4

Prakrit records of the Buddhist age

The earliest writing in the region is in Prakrit, in the Brahmi script. Besides Erragudi, a second copy of Asoka’s Minor Rock Edicts survives at Rajula-Mandagiri.5 A hand-copy of it lay in Colin Mackenzie’s manuscripts for well over a century. The stone itself was found again only in 1953.5

The short donors’ inscriptions on the Bhattiprolu relic caskets carry no date.6 G. Bühler dated them by comparing their letters with Asoka’s.6 He concluded that they “cannot be placed later than 200 B.C.”.6 He also warned that evidence of this kind “may mislead”.6

Buddhist gift records also keep the names of kings and queens. A Prakrit inscription from the Amaravati stupa (relic mound) is dated in a regnal year of the Satavahana king Vasishthiputra Pulumavi.7 But the number of the year has been lost at a break in the stone.7

At Nagarjunakonda, pillars noticed in 1926 led to excavations.8 These recovered more than twenty inscriptions of the Ikshvaku period.8 Hirananda Sastri pointed out that not one of them recorded a gift by a male member of the royal house. The gifts recorded were made by its women.9 See Nagarjunakonda inscriptions of Chamtisiri.

The first Telugu records

Telugu appears first as words in Sanskrit and Prakrit records, and then as the language of whole inscriptions.10 The damaged pillar at Kalamalla in Kadapa district is dated by its letter forms to about 575.10 Its editors described it as one of the earliest records written entirely in Telugu.10 When it was first printed, in South Indian Inscriptions X (1948), its editors could make out little more than two names.11

The Addanki inscription of the mid-9th century opens with a Telugu verse.12 Its editor saw in it evidence that Telugu poetry was being written in the mid-9th century.12 That is long before Nannaya’s Mahabharata of the 11th century.12

Copper-plate charters

Kings also recorded gifts of land on sets of copper plates, often with a royal seal.13 These charters give family histories and dates, but they need careful reading. The Nandamapundi grant of 1053 names its verse-writer as Nanniyabhatta, perhaps the poet Nannaya.14 Its editor, F. Kielhorn, found that the first three plates had been beaten flat and re-cut from an older grant.13 So the verses on them cannot safely be credited to the named author.13

Kakatiya temple and pillar inscriptions

Under the Kakatiyas, long Sanskrit and Telugu inscriptions on temple pillars record gifts, family histories and wars. They were not always read correctly at first. The Thousand Pillar Temple inscription at Hanamkonda was first printed in a version that read its date as Saka 1054 (Saka is an Indian way of counting years).15 Another scholar read Saka 1064.15 J. F. Fleet’s edition of 1882 established Saka 1084 (1162–63).15

The Palampet inscription dates the founding of the Ramappa temple to 1213.16 It was published only in 1919, from impressions taken by G. Yazdani in 1916.16 The Motupalli pillar of 1244–45 is an edict addressed to sea traders.17 In it, Ganapatideva promised that the cargo of ships “wrecked, and thrown on shore” would no longer be seized.17

A single short record can overturn a chronology. Robert Sewell’s list of inscriptions, collected up to 1923, still had Rudramadevi reigning in 1289.18 It suggested that she died in 1291.18 P. V. Parabrahma Sastry published and discussed the Chandupatla inscription.19 It records a gift made in November 1289 for the merit of the queen, who had already died.19

Persian and Arabic inscriptions

The Bahmani and Qutb Shahi rulers left inscriptions in Persian and Arabic on mosques, tombs and gates.20 These too can correct the chronicles. Ferishta’s history says that Sultan Quli did not declare his independence until AH 918 (1512; AH is the Islamic way of counting years).21 Yet the inscription of his mosque in Golconda fort is dated AH 924 (1518).20 It says that Sultan Quli, “entitled Qutbul Mulk”, built it “during the reign of the great King… Mahmood Shah son of Muhammad Shah Bahmani”.20

These inscriptions were also valued as art.22 G. Yazdani called the door inscription of the Jami Masjid of Hyderabad “the finest example of the Nasta’liq script in the Deccan”.22 Different editors read the same Persian verses differently.23 T. W. Haig’s first edition of 1909 missed parts of two lines.23

Dating: eras, cycles and reigns

Inscriptions are dated in several ways. Turning their dates into the modern calendar is itself a piece of research. Many count years in the Saka era, and also give the name of the year in the sixty-year cycle.24 C. P. Brown explained the system in 1863.24 He noted that “the Hindus know their years by titles, dispensing with numerals”, and that many documents give only the title.24

Other inscriptions count the years of a king’s reign.25 Kielhorn dated the Nandamapundi grant to 28 November 1053.25 He did this by finding the only lunar eclipse that fell in the 32nd year of Rajaraja’s reign.25 Persian inscriptions use the Hijri (AH) era.26 Sometimes the year is hidden in a chronogram, a phrase whose letters add up to the year. The Jami Masjid inscription of Hyderabad has one.26

Coins

Coins survive in large numbers, but many have been lost. Walter Elliot wrote that gold and silver pieces were “speedily converted into jewels”.27 Copper ones were sold as old metal.27 He looked forward to what might be learned “when more have been rescued from the goldsmith’s crucible and the brazier’s melting-pot”.27

Elliot formed his collection between 1825 and 1850.28 He noted that his earliest class of coins, of lead, copper and mixed metal, came especially from the deltas of the Godavari and Krishna.28 He wrote that “the characteristic of the Andhrian coinage was the employment of lead”.28

At Gudivada, Robert Sewell collected lead coins.29 On them Alexander Cunningham read the names of Satavahana kings, among them Yajna Sri and Sri Chanda.29 One type showed a two-masted ship.29 Alexander Rea later described seventy-two lead coins from the same site. They were the best of the 120 he obtained.30

At Bhattiprolu, twenty-four small silver coins were found inside a relic casket.31 They bore symbols such as footprints, tridents and lotuses. They were laid out in the shape of a svastika.31

For later periods the evidence is thinner. Elliot saw few coins that he could assign to the Kakatiyas.32 He described a lying bull on their seals and on a gold coin.32 He also described a copper coin whose partial legend seemed to name Prataparudra. That coin had since been lost.32

After the fall of Warangal, gold coins of Muhammad bin Tughluq were struck at the mint of “Sultanpur”.33 This was the new name given to the city.33 The coins are dated AH 729.33 In 1635 Golconda accepted a farman (decree) from the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan. After this, it had coins struck in the emperor’s name.34

Travellers and foreign chroniclers

Visitors from abroad describe things that inscriptions rarely mention, such as ports, diamond mines and the look of cities. Marco Polo described a kingdom he called “Mutfili”.35 He praised its queen as “a lover of justice, of equity, and of peace”.35 His editor Henry Yule identified Mutfili as the Kakatiya kingdom, named after the port of Motupalli.35

But Polo made the queen the widow of the last king.35 Henry Yule’s notes of 1903 still called her Ganapati’s widow.35 The Kotagiri plates, published in 1925, confirmed that Rudramadevi was Ganapatideva’s daughter.36

The same is true of the Persian chronicles and European accounts of the 16th and 17th centuries. Brown thought the Muslim historians of India “precise in their dates, but not always veracious”.37 Robert Sewell’s A Forgotten Empire (1900) translated two Portuguese accounts of Vijayanagara, from copies in Paris.38 They were by Domingo Paes (about 1520) and Fernao Nuniz (about 1536–37).38

V. Ball translated Jean-Baptiste Tavernier’s account of Golconda in 1889.39 Tavernier says that Bhagnagar (Hyderabad) was named after a wife of the king called “Nagar”. Ball’s note corrects her name to Bhagmati.39

W. H. Moreland edited three reports on Golconda by English and Dutch merchants at Machilipatnam (then Masulipatam) and Nizampatnam.40 They were written between about 1614 and the mid-1620s.40 The Dutch reports were written for their employers, not for the public. Moreland argued that they confirm the general accuracy of the English one.40

The Mackenzie collection and the kaifiyats

Colin Mackenzie (1754–1821) gathered a great body of material on the history of the Telugu country before 1800.5 He was a military surveyor who became the first Surveyor-General of India.5 He admitted that he did not know the local languages himself.41 He owed his start to a young Brahmin assistant, Boria, whose “happy genius” opened “a new avenue to Hindoo knowledge”.41 After Boria’s early death, his younger brother and others carried on the work.41

Mackenzie claimed to have collected “upwards of 3,000 authentic inscriptions” since 1800.42 His assistants copied inscriptions.43 From temple Brahmins and village record-keepers, they took down “copies of all records in their possession, or original statements of local traditions”.43

H. H. Wilson catalogued the collection in 1828. He called these local accounts “Local Tracts”.44 He described them as “short accounts… of particular places, remarkable buildings, local traditions, and peculiar usages”, most still untranslated.44 He thought the copies of inscriptions “the most laborious, and probably the most valuable portion of the whole”.44

The Telugu local accounts are known as kaifiyats.45 The collection went to the Government Oriental Manuscripts Library at Madras.45 It also kept drawings. Mackenzie visited the Amaravati stupa in 1797, when its stones were being carried off for a local temple.46 He returned in 1816 with assistants, who made a large series of drawings of its sculptures.46

C. P. Brown later translated one Telugu history from the collection, the Wars of the Rajas.47 It is a history of Anantapur written between about 1750 and 1810.47

Scholars used this material with caution. Wilson observed that Telugu local histories mix “much exaggeration and fiction” with “materials for history”.48 Walter Elliot suspected that the dates in Mackenzie’s copies of Kakatiya inscriptions had been “incorrectly copied”.49 He declined to quote local-language histories that “rest on no sufficient evidence”.49

Wilson himself, relying on the collection, placed Nannaya’s patron at the close of the 13th century.50 In the light of grants edited later, this was two centuries too late.50 Brown, in turn, had to correct a date in his manuscript that could not match its cyclic year.51

Writing in 1932, Hirananda Sastri used the Kimmuru kaifiyat and others to trace Shitab Khan.45 Shitab Khan was the chief of Warangal who fought the first Qutb Shahi king. Sastri warned that “tradition may not be taken as genuine history” unless other evidence supports it.45 He found that the accounts mixed up two different men of the same name.45

Collecting and publishing

Systematic work began in the late 19th century. The Imperial Gazetteer records what happened in the Madras Presidency.1 The first list of antiquities was published in 1882, and an Archaeological Survey was set up.1 Then “a few years later a Government Epigraphist was appointed”.1 He was “systematically translating and publishing the countless inscriptions on the thousands of temples”.1

District collections followed.52 In 1905 Alan Butterworth and V. Venugopaul Chetty published about 903 inscriptions of Nellore district.52 They frankly judged that most were “grants to tanks and temples” that told “nothing” of the condition of the people.52 They also noted that inscribed stones had been built into the Collector’s own office at Nellore.52

In Hyderabad State, an Archaeological Department was organised in 1914 under G. Yazdani.53 Its duties included collecting inscriptions, manuscripts and coins.53 By 1936 it reported several hundred newly discovered inscriptions.53

Its Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts (1942) gathered fifty-six Telugu inscriptions dated between 1079 and 1357.54 The government’s resolution thanked a research society, the Parisodhaka Mandali.54 The Mandali had published a collection of Kakatiya and other Telangana inscriptions in 1935.54

Telugu public bodies took up the work too. The Andhra Jana Sangham was founded in Hyderabad in 1921.55 It made the collection of inscriptions and historical books part of its programme (see Madapati Hanumantha Rao).55

The Andhra Historical Research Society at Rajahmundry began its journal in 1926.56 Its first editorial said the region’s temples still had “innumerable inscriptions” that scholars had not touched.56 It complained that the country had “suffered much on account of exploitation by persons from outside who carried away” its manuscripts.56

Manuscripts are a further archive. The Government Oriental Manuscripts Library at Madras also kept the Mackenzie papers.57 It published descriptive catalogues of its Telugu manuscripts. These give the length, condition, and opening and closing lines of each work.57

In 1929 the Madras government told the Legislative Council that it did not intend to hand these Telugu manuscripts over to the Andhra University.58 It said it had seen newspaper articles protesting against such a transfer.58 For the modern period, census reports add regular counts of population and language. In Hyderabad State they ran every ten years from 1881.59

Limits of the evidence

The sources are uneven. Inscriptions record what kings, chiefs and donors wished to be remembered, mostly gifts to temples.52 They say little about ordinary lives.52 Many are undated or dated only by reign. So their dates depend on letter forms or on disputed king-lists.610

Copies and early editions contain errors.1549 The scans used for this site are often read through imperfect machine OCR, so readings need checking against the page images. Travellers and chroniclers wrote from outside or from a court, and the kaifiyats mix fact and tradition.3745

About the sources. Some sources are only touched on here. Ibn Battuta’s account of the Deccan is available to this site only in a modern copyrighted translation and is not used here. The Andhra Pradesh and Telangana state archives, and the epigraphy department’s annual reports, have not been consulted page by page. Oral epics and songs, another way the past was remembered, are discussed under Folk songs & oral traditions.

Footnotes

  1. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Madras, Vol. I (1908), pp. 23–24 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  2. D. C. Sircar, “Erragudi Edicts of Asoka”, Epigraphia Indica XXXII (1959), p. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  3. F. Kielhorn, “Chikkulla Plates of Vikramendravarman II”, Epigraphia Indica IV (1897), p. 193 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  4. S. Hanumant Rao and Lakshmi Kanta Sastri, The Kotagiri Plates of the Reign of the Kakatiya Queen Rudramamba (1925), p. v (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  5. D. C. Sircar, “Rajula-Mandagiri Inscription of Asoka”, Epigraphia Indica XXXI (1960), p. 211 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  6. G. Bühler, “The Bhattiprolu Inscriptions”, Epigraphia Indica II (1894), p. 325 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  7. James Burgess, The Buddhist Stupas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 100 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  8. J. Ph. Vogel, “Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist Site at Nagarjunikonda”, Epigraphia Indica XX (1933), p. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  9. A. H. Longhurst, “Excavations at Nagarjunikonda”, Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India 1927–28 (1931), p. 119 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  10. K. A. Nilakanta Sastri and M. Venkataramayya, “Telugu Chola Records from Anantapur and Cuddapah”, Epigraphia Indica XXVII (1956), p. 221 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  11. J. Ramayya Pantulu (ed.), South Indian Inscriptions X (1948), No. 607, PDF p. 340 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  12. K. V. Lakshmana Rao, “The Addanki Stone Inscription of Pandaranga”, Epigraphia Indica XIX (1928), p. 273 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  13. Kielhorn, “Nandamapundi Grant” (1897), p. 301 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  14. F. Kielhorn, “Nandamapundi Grant of Rajaraja I”, Epigraphia Indica IV (1897), p. 303 and n. 3 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  15. J. F. Fleet, “Sanskrit and Old-Canarese Inscriptions, No. CXVIII”, Indian Antiquary XI (1882), p. 9 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  16. L. D. Barnett (ed.), Inscriptions at Palampet and Uparpalli (1919), p. v (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  17. E. Hultzsch, “Motupalli Pillar-Inscription of Ganapatideva”, Epigraphia Indica XII (1914), p. 196 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  18. Robert Sewell, The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (1932), p. 166 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)), p. 169 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  19. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 125–126. ↩ ↩2

  20. Syed Ali Asgar Bilgrami, Landmarks of the Deccan (1927), p. 111 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  21. Muhammad Qasim Ferishta, tr. John Briggs, History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India, Vol. III (1829), pp. 322–323 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  22. G. Yazdani, “Inscriptions of the Qutb Shahi Kings in Hyderabad City and Suburbs”, Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica 1917–18 (1921), p. 43 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  23. Yazdani, Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica 1917–18 (1921), p. 44, notes (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); T. W. Haig, “Inscriptions in Hyderabad and Golconda”, Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica 1907–08 (1909), p. 29 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  24. Charles Philip Brown, Carnatic Chronology (1863), Preface, PDF p. 8 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  25. Kielhorn, “Nandamapundi Grant” (1897), p. 303 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  26. Yazdani, Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica 1917–18 (1921), p. 44, note (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  27. Walter Elliot, Coins of Southern India (1886), pp. 7–8 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  28. Elliot, Coins of Southern India (1886), p. 8 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)), p. 22 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  29. Alexander Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities (1894), p. 20, quoting Robert Sewell (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  30. Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities (1894), p. 21 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  31. Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities (1894), p. 12 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  32. Elliot, Coins of Southern India (1886), p. 85 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  33. Elliot, Coins of Southern India (1886), p. 84 and n. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  34. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Hyderabad State (1909), p. 14 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  35. Henry Yule and Henri Cordier, The Book of Ser Marco Polo, Vol. II (1903), pp. 359–360 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); Yule’s note, p. 362 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  36. Hanumant Rao and Lakshmi Kanta Sastri, The Kotagiri Plates (1925), p. v (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  37. Brown, Carnatic Chronology (1863), Preface, PDF p. 8 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  38. Robert Sewell, A Forgotten Empire (Vijayanagar) (1900), Preface (Gutenberg (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  39. Jean-Baptiste Tavernier, Travels in India, tr. V. Ball, Vol. I (1889), p. 151 and n. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  40. W. H. Moreland (ed.), Relations of Golconda in the Early Seventeenth Century (1931), pp. xxv–xxvii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  41. Colin Mackenzie, letter printed in H. H. Wilson, The Mackenzie Collection, Vol. I (1828), Introduction, PDF pp. 8–9 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  42. Mackenzie, in Wilson, The Mackenzie Collection (1828), Introduction, PDF p. 17 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  43. Wilson, The Mackenzie Collection (1828), pp. xvi–xvii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  44. Wilson, The Mackenzie Collection (1828), pp. xx–xxi (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  45. Hirananda Sastri, Shitab Khan of Warangal (1932), PDF pp. 12–13 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  46. Burgess, Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 2 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)), pp. 13–14 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  47. Charles Philip Brown (tr.), The Wars of the Rajas, Being the History of Anantapuram (1853), title page and Preface, PDF pp. 5, 7 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  48. Wilson, The Mackenzie Collection (1828), Introduction, PDF p. 43 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  49. Elliot, Coins of Southern India (1886), p. 83 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)), p. 85 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  50. Wilson, The Mackenzie Collection (1828), Introduction, PDF p. 42 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); Kielhorn, “Nandamapundi Grant” (1897), p. 302 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  51. Brown, The Wars of the Rajas (1853), p. 3, note (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  52. Alan Butterworth and V. Venugopaul Chetty, Nellore District Inscriptions, Part I (1905), Preface, pp. v, viii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  53. The Story of the Archaeological Department, Hyderabad Deccan, 1914–1936 (1936), pp. 2, 8 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  54. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts, Part I (1942), Resolution, pp. v–vi (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  55. Sarojini Regani, Highlights of the Freedom Movement in Andhra Pradesh (1956), pp. 177–178 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  56. Journal of the Andhra Historical Research Society, Vol. I (1926), editorial, PDF pp. 12–14 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  57. S. Kuppuswami Sastri (ed.), A Descriptive Catalogue of the Telugu Manuscripts in the Government Oriental Manuscripts Library, Madras, Vol. II, Part 2 (1927), p. 797 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  58. Madras Legislative Council: Questions and Answers, 29 January 1929, pp. 207–208 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  59. Census of India 1931, Vol. XXIII: H.E.H. the Nizam’s Dominions, Part I: Report (1933), Introduction, PDF p. 12 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)), p. 222 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

Photos

Show all (574)

References

Sources (40)
  1. Jas. Burgess (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. II (1894) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1894, pp. 325. G. Bühler on the Bhattiprolu caskets. [Public domain]
  2. F. Kielhorn (articles); E. Hultzsch (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. IV (1896–97) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1897, pp. 193, 301, 303. Kielhorn on the Chikkulla plates and the Nandamapundi grant. [Public domain]
  3. Sten Konow (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XII (1913–14) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1914, pp. 190, 196. Hultzsch on the Motupalli pillar. [Public domain]
  4. Hirananda Sastri (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XIX (1927–28) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1928, pp. 273. [Public domain]
  5. Hirananda Sastri (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XX (1929–30) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1933, pp. 1. [Public domain]
  6. B. Ch. Chhabra and N. Lakshminarayan Rao (eds.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXVII (1947–48) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1956, pp. 221. [Public domain in India]
  7. N. Lakshminarayan Rao and D. C. Sircar (eds.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXXI (1955–56) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1960, pp. 211. [Public domain in India]
  8. D. C. Sircar and B. Ch. Chhabra (eds.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXXII (1957–58) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1959, pp. 1–2. [Public domain in India]
  9. J. F. Fleet, Sanskrit and Old-Canarese Inscriptions, No. CXVIII (Kakatya inscription of Rudradeva at Anamkond, Saka 1084), Indian Antiquary, Vol. XI (opens in a new tab), Indian Antiquary (ed. Jas. Burgess), Bombay, 1882, pp. 9. [Public domain]
  10. H. Hargreaves (ed.), Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India, 1927-28 (opens in a new tab), Government of India, Central Publication Branch, Calcutta, 1931, pp. 119. [Public domain]
  11. L. D. Barnett (ed.), Inscriptions at Palampet and Uparpalli (Hyderabad Archaeological Series, No. 3) (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1919, v. [Public domain]
  12. Archaeological Department, H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions, The Kotagiri Plates of the Reign of the Kakatiya Queen Rudramamba, A.D. 1273 (Hyderabad Archaeological Series No. 6) (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1925, v. [Public domain]
  13. James Burgess, The Buddhist Stupas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta in the Krishna District, Madras Presidency, Surveyed in 1882 (opens in a new tab), Trübner & Co. for the Archaeological Survey of Southern India, 1887, pp. 2, 13–14, 100. [Public domain]
  14. Alexander Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities, including the Stupas of Bhattiprolu, Gudivada and Ghantasala and other Ancient Sites in the Krishna District (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras (Archaeological Survey of India), 1894, pp. 12, 20–21. [Public domain]
  15. Walter Elliot, Coins of Southern India (International Numismata Orientalia, Vol. III, Part 2) (opens in a new tab), Trübner & Co., London, 1886, pp. 7–8, 22, 83–85. [Public domain]
  16. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Hyderabad State (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1909, pp. 14. [Public domain]
  17. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Madras, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1908, pp. 23–24. [Public domain]
  18. T. W. Haig; E. Denison Ross (ed.), Inscriptions in Hyderabad and Golconda, Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica 1907–08 (opens in a new tab), Government of India, 1909, pp. 29. [Public domain]
  19. G. Yazdani, Inscriptions of the Qutb Shahi Kings in Hyderabad City and Suburbs, Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica 1917–18 (opens in a new tab), Government of India, 1921, pp. 43–44. [Public domain]
  20. Syed Ali Asgar Bilgrami, Landmarks of the Deccan: A Comprehensive Guide to the Archaeological Remains of the City and Suburbs of Hyderabad (opens in a new tab), Government Central Press, Hyderabad-Deccan, 1927, pp. 111. [Public domain]
  21. Muhammad Qasim Ferishta (tr. John Briggs), History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India till the Year A.D. 1612, Vol. III (opens in a new tab), Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London, 1829, pp. 322–323. [Public domain]
  22. Henry Yule and Henri Cordier (eds.), The Book of Ser Marco Polo the Venetian, Vol. II (3rd ed.) (opens in a new tab), John Murray, London, 1903, pp. 359–362. [Public domain]
  23. Robert Sewell, A Forgotten Empire (Vijayanagar): A Contribution to the History of India (opens in a new tab), Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1900, Preface. [Public domain]
  24. Robert Sewell (ed. S. Krishnaswami Aiyangar), The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (Collected till 1923) and Outlines of Political History (opens in a new tab), University of Madras, 1932, pp. 166, 169. [Public domain in India]
  25. Jean-Baptiste Tavernier (tr. V. Ball), Travels in India, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Macmillan & Co., London, 1889, pp. 151. [Public domain]
  26. W. H. Moreland (ed.), Relations of Golconda in the Early Seventeenth Century (Hakluyt Society, 2nd ser., No. 66) (opens in a new tab), Hakluyt Society, London, 1931, xxv–xxvii. Public domain in India; paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  27. H. H. Wilson, The Mackenzie Collection: A Descriptive Catalogue of the Oriental Manuscripts of the South of India, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Asiatic Press, Calcutta, 1828, Introduction (PDF pp. 8–9, 17, 21–22, 25–26, 42–43). [Public domain]
  28. Charles Philip Brown (tr.), The Wars of the Rajas, Being the History of Anantapuram (opens in a new tab), Christian Knowledge Society's Press, Madras, 1853, Preface, 2–3. [Public domain]
  29. Charles Philip Brown, Carnatic Chronology: The Hindu and Mahomedan Methods of Reckoning Time Explained (opens in a new tab), Bernard Quaritch, London, 1863, Preface. [Public domain]
  30. Hirananda Sastri, Shitab Khan of Warangal (Hyderabad Archaeological Series No. 9) (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1932, PDF pp. 12–13. [Public domain]
  31. Alan Butterworth and V. Venugopaul Chetty, A Collection of the Inscriptions on Copper-Plates and Stones in the Nellore District, Part I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1905, v–viii. [Public domain]
  32. J. Ramayya Pantulu (ed.), South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. X: Telugu Inscriptions from the Madras Presidency (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India (Manager of Publications, Delhi), 1948, No. 607. [Public domain in India]
  33. The story of the archaeological department Hyderabad deccan (opens in a new tab), 1936, pp. 2, 8. Public domain in India; paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  34. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions, Part I (Hyderabad Archaeological Series No. 13) (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1942, v–vi. Public domain in India; paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  35. Sarojini Regani, Highlights of the Freedom Movement in Andhra Pradesh (opens in a new tab), Ministry of Cultural Affairs, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, 1956, pp. 177–178. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  36. Not Available, The Andhra Historical Research Society, Rajahmundry, Vol.1,pt.2 (opens in a new tab), 1926, PDF pp. 12–14. [Public domain]
  37. ఎస్ కుప్పుస్వామిశాస్త్రి(సం.), తెలుగు రాతప్రతుల వివరణాత్మక కేటలాగ్-ప్రభుత్వ ప్రాచ్య వ్రాతప్రతుల గ్రంథాలయము 2వ సంపుటము ప్రబంధములు శృంగార ప్రబంధములు(రెండవ భాగము) (A Descriptive Catalogue Of The Telugu Manuscripts Vol II) (opens in a new tab), 1927, pp. 797. [Public domain]
  38. Tamil Nadu Legislative Council, Presentation of the Telugu manuscripts in the Oriental Manuscripts Library to the Andhra University (opens in a new tab), 1929, pp. 207–208. [Public domain]
  39. Khan, Gulam Ahmad, Census of India 1931 vol.23 H.E.H. the Nizamʼs dominions (Hyderabad State); pt.1- Report (opens in a new tab), 1933, Introduction, 222. [Public domain]
  40. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal, Government of Andhra Pradesh, 1978, pp. 125–126. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: