Nachana Somana
Telugu poet at the court of Bukka I of Vijayanagara in the 14th century and author of the Uttara Harivamsamu, a retelling of the later life of Krishna. Critics ranked him with the three poets of the Telugu Mahabharata, and N. Venkataramanayya pointed to him as the only poet in a spoken language known to have been patronised by Bukka.
Nachana Somana was a Telugu poet of the 14th century at the court of Bukka I, one of the founders of Vijayanagara.12 His known poem is the Uttara Harivamsamu (the later Harivamsa), on the later life of Krishna.1 Critics have ranked it with the work of the three poets of the Telugu Mahabharata.1 Historians have used his career as evidence about the origins of the Vijayanagara kings.2
The court poet of Bukka
P. Chenchiah and Raja M. Bhujanga Rao, in their history of Telugu literature (1928), date Nachana Soma to 1355–77.1 They call him “a court poet of Bukka Raya, an ancestor of Krishnadevaraya”.1 P. T. Raju, in 1944, also places the poet at Bukka’s court.3
N. Venkataramanayya wrote about the founders of Vijayanagara in 1929.2 He wrote that “Bukka I was the patron of the Telugu poet Nachana Soma”.2 The poem is dedicated to “Hariharanatha”.2 Venkataramanayya noted that this “is taken to be a covert allusion to Harihara I”.2 See Harihara I. He also found that the poet and the king held the same views on the quarrels between religious sects.2 From this he judged that the two men were very close.2
He made one more point. “It is significant”, he wrote, “that the only vernacular poet whom Bukka ever patronised was a Telugu poet”.2 He used this, with other evidence, to argue that the Sangama kings were of Telugu origin.2
The Uttara Harivamsamu
Errapragada had already put the Harivamsa into Telugu.1 Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao thought Nachana Soma was “probably dissatisfied with Errapragada’s achievement”.1 So he wrote the story again, in a style he thought worthy of it.1 They reported that “competent critics” judged it equal to the work of the Kavitraya (the three poets of the Telugu Mahabharata), and in parts better.1
Not everything in the poem pleased them. They found its prose passages too ornate, full of double meanings and word-play.4 They counted him among the poets whose fame has come down to us “without transmitting much of their work”.1
K. Sitaramaiya, writing in Hyderabad in 1943, saw him as a forerunner of the later long story-poems.5 In his view Nachana Somanatha, Pillalamarri Pinaveerabhadrudu and Srinatha laid the foundations for the prabandha (long narrative poem).5
Learning in Kannada
C. R. Reddy wrote the foreword to Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao’s book.6 He named Nachana Soma among the Telugu poets who were “celebrated for their attainments in Kanarese”.6 With Nannechoda and others, he took this as a sign of the early closeness of Telugu and Kannada.6
Footnotes
-
Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (1928), p. 59 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10
-
N. Venkataramanayya, Kampili and Vijayanagara (1929), p. 26, note 3 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10
-
P. T. Raju, Telugu Literature (1944), p. 29 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩
-
Chenchiah and Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (1928), p. 93 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩
-
K. Sitaramaiya, A Hand Book of Telugu Literature (1943), p. 33 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2
-
C. R. Reddy, foreword to P. Chenchiah and Raja M. Bhujanga Rao, A History of Telugu Literature (1928), p. 6 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3
References
Notes (0)
Sources (4)
Spotted an error on this page? Tell us
Last updated: