Polamuru
Village near Anaparti in the former Ramachandrapuram taluk of Godavari district. D. C. Sircar identified it with Puloburu, the village granted by the Vishnukundin king Madhavavarman Janashraya. The Eastern Chalukya Jayasimha I granted it again to the donee's son. Another scholar placed the village at a Polamuru in Bhimavaram taluk.
Polamuru is the modern form of the village named in two early copper-plate grants.12 They are the Polamuru plates of the Vishnukundin king Madhavavarman Janashraya, and a grant of the Eastern Chalukya king Jayasimha I.12 M. Somasekhara Sarma explained the old spelling Pulomburu as an early Telugu way of writing Polamuru.3 In it the nasal sound is written over the following letter.3
One village, two kings
The Vishnukundin grant gave the village, in the Guddavadi district, to a Brahmin named Shivasharman.41 Jayasimha I later gave the same village to Shivasharman’s son Rudrasharman, who is described as its former holder.52 D. C. Sircar thought the change of hands reflected fighting between the Chalukyas and the Vishnukundins in the district.6 R. S. Panchamukhi thought the son had lost the village, or had his title disputed, when power passed to the Chalukyas.7
The interval between the two grants is one of the main props of every Vishnukundin chronology; see the Vishnukundins page.18
Which Polamuru?
The sources disagree about which Polamuru is meant:
- Robert Sewell and S. Krishnaswami Aiyangar placed the Vishnukundin grant at Polamur in Godavari district, without further detail.9
- Sircar identified the village with Polamuru near Anaparti railway station and called it the findspot of both grants.210 He took the neighbouring Mahendravada to be the Mayindavataki of the Vishnukundin grant.210 He placed the Guddavadi district in the later Ramachandrapuram taluk.210
- V. Rangacharya edited Jayasimha’s grant in 1928, and he identified its Pulibumra with Polamuru in Bhimavaram taluk.5 Following E. Hultzsch, he took Guddavadi to be Gudivada in Krishna (then Kistna) district.5
The coordinates given here follow Sircar’s identification.2
Footnotes
-
D. C. Sircar, The Successors of the Satavahanas in Lower Deccan (1939), p. 107 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
-
Sircar, Successors of the Satavahanas (1939), p. 108 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7
-
M. Somasekhara Sarma, “Indrabhattaraka and the Ganga Era”, Journal of the Andhra Historical Research Society V, pt. 3 (1930–31), p. 183, note 14 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2
-
Annual Report on Epigraphy, Madras, for 1913–14 (1914), Part II, para. 35, p. 102 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩
-
V. Rangacharya, “The Pulibumra Plates of the Eastern Chalukya King Jayasimha I”, Epigraphia Indica XIX (1928), p. 255 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Sircar, Successors of the Satavahanas (1939), p. 109 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩
-
Panchamukhi, “Tandivada Grant” (1936), p. 94 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩
-
R. S. Panchamukhi, “Tandivada Grant of Prithivi-Maharaja: 46th Year”, Epigraphia Indica XXIII (1936), p. 93 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩
-
Robert Sewell and S. Krishnaswami Aiyangar, The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (1932), p. 21 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩
-
Sircar, Successors of the Satavahanas (1939), p. 131 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3
Photos
References
Notes (0)
Sources (6)
Spotted an error on this page? Tell us
Last updated:

