Vikramaditya V (Chalukya of Kalyani)
Vikramaditya V, called Tribhuvanamalla, was a king of the Western Chalukyas of Kalyani from about 1008 to 1014, a nephew of Satyasraya. A Jaina pillar inscription of his reign at Chilkur, near Hyderabad, dated 1012 by its editor, names his general Padmanabhayya as ruler of the Lombulike Seventy. It says that the king was camped on a stream with the aim of conquering the north and uprooting Bhoja of Malava. Another record of 1014, at Nandikandi in the Medak district, names his feudatory Pampa Permadi.
Download
Vikramaditya V was a king of the Chalukyas of Kalyani, who reigned for a few years from about 1008.12 J. F. Fleet found no history in the records of his reign that he knew.3 But a pillar inscription later found at Chilkur, near Hyderabad, shows his commander governing that country and the king at war with Malava.45
Who he was
Vikramaditya V was the eldest son of Dasavarman, a younger brother of Satyasraya.1 Dasavarman himself did not reign, so the throne passed from the uncle to the nephew.1 Fleet thought that Vikramaditya probably came to the throne in 1009, while Robert Sewell put it in 1008.12 His title was Tribhuvanamalla, “the wrestler of the three worlds”.1 His youngest brother, Jayasimha II, followed him.3
The Chilkur pillar
A square pillar with a long inscription was found at Chilkur, about twenty miles from Hyderabad on the road to Vikarabad.4 It was later kept in the Khazana Buildings at Golconda.4 C. T. M. Kotraiah edited it in Epigraphia Andhrica, as reprinted in Epigraphia Telanganica.4 It is a Jaina record of a gift to the Tirthankara Parsvanatha, in Kannada prose and Sanskrit verse.5
The record names the king only as Tribhuvanamalla, a title borne by both Vikramaditya V and Vikramaditya VI.4 Kotraiah assigned it to Vikramaditya V, because it makes the king a rival of Bhoja of Malava.4 He restored the damaged year as Saka 934, which fell on 25 September 1012.4
The inscription says that Tribhuvanamalla was then camped on the bank of a stream called Payani.5 He meant to conquer the north and to uproot Bhojadeva of Malava.5 The donor was the great commander Padmanabhayya, who governed the Lombulike Seventy division.5 Kotraiah thought that Chilkur was the headquarters of that division.5
Pampa Permadi
At Nandikandi, in the Medak district, a record of 23 December 1014 belongs to Vikramaditya’s reign.6 In it Pampa Permadi gave a village to the god Namesvara.6 The epigraphy report for 1961–62 noted that a Pampa-permanadi also appears under Somesvara I in 1050–51.7 If they were one man, the report said, he held office for fifty-five years.7
Where the sources disagree
- His accession. About 1009 (Fleet), or 1008 (Sewell).12
- Which Tribhuvanamalla? Kotraiah gave three reasons for Vikramaditya V: the rivalry with Bhoja, an inscription of Saka 934 at Kotavumachgi, and the name of the same commander in a record of Saka 933.4 A record of 1096, of Vikramaditya VI’s time, has another man, Kumara Jayasimhadeva, in charge of the Lombulike Seventy.4
Footnotes
-
J. F. Fleet, “Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts”, Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency I, pt. II (1896), p. 434 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
-
Robert Sewell, The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (1932), p. 58 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Fleet, “Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts” (1896), p. 435 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2
-
Epigraphia Telanganica I (2023), p. 107, No. 37, reprinting C. T. M. Kotraiah, “Chilkur Pillar-Inscription of Chalukya Vikramaditya V”, Epigraphia Andhrica II (1974), pp. 50–55. Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9
-
Epigraphia Telanganica I (2023), p. 108, reprinting Kotraiah, Epigraphia Andhrica II. Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
-
Gajjala Vasanta Lakshmi (ed.), Epigraphia Telanganica I: Pre-Kakatiya Telangana (2023), p. 105, Chalukyas of Kalyana No. 34, summarising Inscriptions of Andhra Pradesh, Medak District (2001), pp. 30–32. Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2
-
Epigraphia Telanganica I (2023), p. 106, No. 36, summarising the Annual Report on Indian Epigraphy for 1961–62, pp. 19 and 49. Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2
References
Notes (0)
Sources (3)
Spotted an error on this page? Tell us
Last updated: