A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Ramatirtham plates of Indravarman

Sanskrit copper-plate grant of the Vishnukundin king Indravarman (Indrabhattarakavarman), issued from Puranisangama in his 27th year. It gives the village of Peruvataka in the Plaki district to a Brahmin. A family of pandits at Ramatirtham near Vizianagaram held it. It was noticed in 1909, and E. Hultzsch edited it in 1914. Its short family line confirmed the line of the Chikkulla plates and the Vishnukundin marriage with the Vakatakas.

The Ramatirtham plates are the only known grant of the Vishnukundin king Indravarman.12 They were the second Vishnukundin record to be published, after the Chikkulla plates of his son.12 They confirmed the family line given in those plates.12

Discovery

The plates belonged to a learned family of pandits at Ramatirtham, near Vizianagaram.32 They came to the epigraphy office through the collection of Mr. Appa Rao Pantulu.32 H. Krishna Sastri described them in the epigraphical report for 1908–09.32 E. Hultzsch edited them in Epigraphia Indica XII from Krishna Sastri’s ink impressions.24

Description

There are three copper plates, each about 8¼ inches long and 2 inches wide.23 The first and third are inscribed on the inner side only.23 They hang on an oval copper ring, which had not been cut when the plates reached the office.23 Its ends are fixed in a mass of copper bearing an oval seal.23

Krishna Sastri described the seal as showing “an advancing lion or tiger with its left fore-paw raised”.3 Its “neck erect, mouth wide open and the tail swung over the back so as to end in a loop”.3 He compared it with the lion of the Chikkulla seal.3 With ring and seal the plates weigh 75 tolas.2

Script and language

The alphabet resembles that of the Chikkulla plates.2 But neither t nor n has the loop that marks them there.2 The grant writes the name of the Plaki district with the Dravidian letter ḷ.2 The language is Sanskrit prose, with four of the usual verses said to be by Vyasa and Manu.2

Hultzsch found the wording of the praise of the kings wrong in places.2 He thought the clerk who drafted it had copied or adapted an old office record “in a very careless manner”.2

Content

The grant opens “from (his) residence (or camp) at Puranisangama”.56 It praises the Maharaja Madhavavarman, who meditated on the feet of the lord of Sriparvata.56 He “had washed off the impurity of the world by bathing at the end of eleven horse-sacrifices”.56 His son, the king Vikramendra, “became an ornament of both families”.56

The donor is Vikramendra’s son, the king Indravarman.56 He is “victorious by encountering in hundred-thousands of battles numerous four-tusked (elephants)”.56 He is also “a fervent worshipper of Maheśvara (Śiva)”.56

He addresses the ryots (farmers) gathered at the village of Peruvadaka in the Plaki district (rashtra).6 He tells them that the village has been made a tax-free agrahara (Brahmin village) for Nagnasarman, a Taittiriya Brahmin of the Mandira gotra (clan).6 They are to give the Brahmin “the customary produce of it” and perform their duties, such as carrying messages.6 The king himself issued the command.6 The grant is dated on the seventh day of the bright fortnight of Jyaishtha in the 27th year of the reign.6

What the plates showed

Krishna Sastri and Hultzsch both saw from the family line that Indravarman was the Indrabhattarakavarman of the Chikkulla plates.32 He was the father of Vikramendravarman II.32 Hultzsch read the phrase “an ornament of both families” together with the Chikkulla plates.4 To him it showed that Vikramendravarman I’s mother must have belonged to the Vakataka family.4

Krishna Sastri argued in 1909 that the Vishnukundins were “distinctly a northern family”.3 In his view their early home lay in Visakhapatnam (then Vizagapatam) district, where he thought Sriparvata should be sought.3 Only later did they move south to Lendulura (Denduluru).3

The Plaki district

The Plaki district is also named in grants of the Eastern Chalukya king Vishnuvardhana I.2 Jouveau-Dubreuil wrongly gave the regnal year as 37.7 He took the grant as proof that Indravarman had won his war against a king of Kalinga and become master of Visakhapatnam district.7

D. C. Sircar doubted any lasting Vishnukundin hold on the Vizianagaram region, which had several local dynasties of its own.8910 He thought the grant was more probably made during a raid into the Plaki district.8910

Edition

  • E. Hultzsch, “Ramatirtham Plates of Indravarman”, Epigraphia Indica XII (1913–14), No. 17, pp. 133–136, with a plate.2

Footnotes

  1. Annual Report on Epigraphy, Madras, for 1913–14 (1914), Part II, para. 35, p. 102 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  2. E. Hultzsch, “Ramatirtham Plates of Indravarman”, Epigraphia Indica XII (1914), p. 133 and notes (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12 ↩13 ↩14 ↩15 ↩16 ↩17 ↩18 ↩19 ↩20 ↩21 ↩22

  3. H. Krishna Sastri, Annual Report on Epigraphy, Southern Circle, for 1908–09 (1909), Part II, para. 62, p. 109 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12 ↩13 ↩14 ↩15

  4. Hultzsch, “Ramatirtham Plates” (1914), p. 134 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  5. Hultzsch, “Ramatirtham Plates” (1914), p. 135, translation (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  6. Hultzsch, “Ramatirtham Plates” (1914), p. 136, translation (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12

  7. G. Jouveau-Dubreuil, Ancient History of the Deccan (1920), p. 91 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  8. D. C. Sircar, The Successors of the Satavahanas in Lower Deccan (1939), p. 120 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  9. Sircar, Successors of the Satavahanas (1939), p. 121 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  10. Sircar, Successors of the Satavahanas (1939), p. 138 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

References

Sources (6)
  1. Sten Konow (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XII (1913–14) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1914, pp. 133–136. No. 17, edited by E. Hultzsch from impressions supplied by H. Krishna Sastri. [Public domain]
  2. Madras Government (Assistant Archaeological Superintendent for Epigraphy), Annual Reports on Epigraphy, Southern Circle, for 1906-07 to 1909-10 (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1910, pp. 109. Annual Report on Epigraphy for 1908–09, Part II, para. 62 (H. Krishna Sastri). [Public domain]
  3. Madras Government (Assistant Archaeological Superintendent for Epigraphy), Annual Reports on Epigraphy, Southern Circle, for 1910-11 to 1914-15 (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1915, pp. 102. Annual Report on Epigraphy for 1913–14, Part II, para. 35. [Public domain]
  4. G. Jouveau-Dubreuil (tr. V. S. Swaminadha Dikshitar), The Pallavas (opens in a new tab), The author, Pondicherry, 1917, pp. 33. [Public domain]
  5. G. Jouveau-Dubreuil, Ancient History of the Deccan (opens in a new tab), The author, Pondicherry (translated by V. S. Swaminadha Dikshitar), 1920, pp. 91. [Public domain]
  6. D. C. Sircar, The Successors of the Satavahanas in Lower Deccan (opens in a new tab), University of Calcutta, 1939, pp. 97, 120–121, 137–138. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: