Nagarjunakonda inscription of Pushpabhadrasvamin
A Sanskrit inscription on a four-faced flagstaff pillar from a temple at the foot of Nagarjuna's hill, dated in the 16th year of the Ikshvaku king Ehuvula Chamtamula. It records that his son, the prince Virapurushadatta, built a shrine of the god Shiva as Pushpabhadrasvamin and gave it a village. It is the first direct evidence of Shaiva worship in the Ikshvaku royal house.
This inscription records the earliest dated temple to Shiva known from Nagarjunakonda, the capital of the Ikshvakus. It was built by a prince of the royal house.12
Where it was found, and what it looks like
The pillar was among the discoveries of the 1956–57 season.3 Sircar and Krishnan describe it as a four-faced pillar from the site of the temple whose god it names.1 The inscription has eleven lines across the faces, covering about 27 by 21½ inches.14 It is neatly engraved and well preserved.14 A further line seems to have been added a little later by a different hand.14
The next season’s excavators placed the Pushpabhadrasvamin temple at the foot of Nagarjuna’s hill.5 They found a large stadium between it and the north-western corner of the citadel.5
The script is the usual Brahmi of the Ikshvaku records.1 The language is Sanskrit, but with Prakrit spellings, and the king’s name is left in its Prakrit form.1
Content
The inscription opens with a salutation to the god Mahadeva Pushpabhadrasvamin.6 It is dated on the 5th day of the second fortnight of summer, in the 16th year of King Vasishthiputra Ehavala Chamtamula.62 It then introduces the donor, the maharajakumara (prince) and mahasenapati (army chief) Haritiputra Virapurushadatta.63 He built a shrine (devakula) for the god.63 He set up a flagstaff (dhvaja-stambha), which the excavators took to be the inscribed pillar itself.63 He gave the village of Pudokedam as a lasting endowment for the temple.63
The prince’s ancestors are given on both sides.6 On his father’s side the record praises his great-grandfather, King Vasishthiputra Chamtamula, for his gifts of gold, cattle and land.6 It also praises him for the Agnishtoma, Vajapeya, Ashvamedha and Bahusuvarnaka sacrifices, and credits him with victories in battle won by his own courage.6 His grandfather, King Mathariputra Virapurushadatta, is barely mentioned.6 His father, King Ehuvula Chamtamula, is compared to Sagara, Dilipa, Ambarisha, Yudhishthira and Rama.6
On his mother’s side, the queen Kupanasri (Kupanasiri) was the granddaughter of the mahatalavara Skandagopa of the Pushyakandiya family.6 She was the daughter of the mahatalavara Khamdahala.6 The temple is described as the fruit of the merit of both mother and son.64 Sircar and Krishnan took this to mean that the queen shared in the work.64 The added last line seems to name two priests of the temple, Kankaphala and Kankachandra.64
Significance
Sircar and Krishnan observed that the royal women of the Ikshvakus were known to have favoured Buddhism.2 The religion of the second and third kings, however, had been unknown.2 They took this record as the first direct proof of the family’s Shaiva leanings (a leaning to the worship of Shiva).2 An inscription of Ehuvula’s 11th year also records a Shiva temple, built by a noble rather than a member of the royal house.2
The prince was apparently named after his grandfather.6 His metronymic (name from his mother) Haritiputra shows that his mother’s family belonged to the Harita clan.6 The excavators described him as a new, fifth member of the dynasty.36 They thought him a cousin of King Rudrapurushadatta.36 Sircar and Krishnan made Rudrapurushadatta a son of Ehuvula Chamtamula by another queen.36 The village of Pudokedam has not been identified.2
Footnotes
-
D. C. Sircar and K. G. Krishnan, “Two Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda”, Epigraphia Indica XXXIV (1961–62, publ. 1963), p. 17 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7
-
Sircar and Krishnan, “Two Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda” (1963), p. 19, with text (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7
-
A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1956–57: A Review (1957), p. 36 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8
-
Sircar and Krishnan, “Two Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda” (1963), p. 20, text line 12 and note (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6
-
A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1957–58: A Review (1958), p. 5 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2
-
Sircar and Krishnan, “Two Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda” (1963), p. 18 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12 ↩13 ↩14 ↩15 ↩16 ↩17 ↩18 ↩19 ↩20 ↩21
References
Notes (0)
Sources (3)
Spotted an error on this page? Tell us
Last updated: