A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Nagarjunakonda

Hill and enclosed valley on the right bank of the Krishna in Palnad taluk, Guntur district. It is the site of Vijayapuri, capital of the Ikshvakus in the 3rd and early 4th centuries CE. A. H. Longhurst excavated its Buddhist monuments in 1927–31. The Archaeological Survey excavated the whole valley in 1954–60, before the Nagarjunasagar dam was to submerge it.

The rebuilt Bodhisri chaitya at Nagarjunakonda, a small domed stupa inside a brick apsidal shrine.
The rebuilt Bodhisri chaitya at Nagarjunakonda, a small domed stupa inside a brick apsidal shrine. · Ayan Mukherjee (opens in a new tab) · CC BY 3.0 (opens in a new tab)

Nagarjunakonda (“Nagarjuna’s hill”) is a flat-topped rocky hill of about 200 acres.12 It overhangs the right bank of the Krishna in the Palnad taluk of Guntur district, on the old border with the Nizam’s Dominions.12 Beside it lies a valley about three miles wide, shut in by hills on three sides and by the river on the fourth.12 In the 1920s the only way in was a footpath over the hills from Nagulavaram, or by the river.1

Before 1926

Nineteenth-century accounts knew the place only as an old hill fort. The Kistna district manual of 1883 records a tradition that the Reddi kings of Kondavidu built “the fortress of Nagarjuna Konda” in the 14th century.34 It lists it among the forts that Pulaya Vema Reddi took.34 Its compiler had not visited this “very remote corner of the District”.5

The Buddhist city

In March 1926 an assistant of the Madras epigraphy office found Buddhist sculpture, brick mounds and inscribed limestone pillars in the valley.67 J. Ph. Vogel, who edited the inscriptions, called it “next to Amaravati, the most important Buddhist site hitherto found in Southern India”.67 M. Hamid Kuraishi began trial excavations at the Great Stupa in 1926–27.8

A. H. Longhurst excavated the site between 1927 and February 1931.910 He uncovered stupas (relic mounds), monasteries, apsidal (round-ended) temples, a probable palace site and coins.910 He also found over four hundred carved reliefs in the Amaravati style.910 The principal monument was the Great Stupa or Mahachaitya.

One of the inscriptions names the city that stood in the valley as Vijayapuri.1112 It places a monastery on the “Siripavata” (Sriparvata) to its east.1112

Vogel noted the Tibetan tradition that the Buddhist philosopher Nagarjuna spent his last years on a Sriparvata, which might explain the hill’s modern name.1112 The records belong to the Ikshvaku kings (see Ikshvakus of Vijayapuri). Vogel knew three of these kings, and he placed them in the 3rd century CE.13 Later finds added a fourth king, Rudrapurushadatta.14

D. C. Sircar dated two inscriptions, written in the cyclic year Vijaya, to 273–74 and 333–34.15 He concluded that the dynasty lasted until about the middle of the 4th century.15

Longhurst thought that the building stone had come down the river. He took a pillared building about 250 feet long on the river front for a stone wharf where it was landed.1617 The excavators of 1956–57 identified the same building as a temple of Karttikeya.18 Inscriptions on its pillars name Chanda-Sakti-kumara, probably its founder.18

The excavations of 1954–60

In the 1950s the valley was due to be flooded by the reservoir of the Nandikonda (Nagarjunasagar) dam. So the Archaeological Survey set out to excavate and save as much as it could before the water rose.1920 Its Nagarjunakonda Excavation Project was formed in 1954 under R. Subrahmanyam.2122 By 1958–59 it had extended the work to about 1,800 acres.2122 Across the river, the Andhra Pradesh archaeology department excavated Yelleswaram, which faced the same fate.20

The excavators uncovered the citadel of Vijayapuri beside the river.23 It was a trapezoid of about 3,000 by 2,000 feet.23 A brick wall, built over an earlier earthen rampart, enclosed it, and a ditch surrounded it, with barracks near its eastern gate.23

Between the citadel and Nagarjuna’s hill they found a sunken brick arena, 309 by 259 feet, with steps for spectators, which they called a stadium.2324 East of the citadel lay a planned township, with a main street, lanes and walled house compounds.25 They also found a neolithic settlement and a megalithic burial in the valley.18 Some of the structures were a century or so older than the Ikshvakus, and some at least two centuries later.26

Brahmanical shrines

The new finds changed the picture of the city’s religion. Chhabra observed that the earlier excavations had found almost only Buddhist remains, while the recent digging had brought many Brahmanical ones to light.19 Brahmanical shrines clustered along the northern river front and within the fortified zone. Buddhist monasteries filled the rest of the valley.18

The shrines included:272818

  • a temple of Shiva as Pushpabhadrasvamin, built by an Ikshvaku prince in the 16th year of King Ehuvula Chamtamula272818
  • a Shiva temple built by the noble Elisri in the same king’s 11th year28
  • temples of Karttikeya18

An inscription found at the river’s edge is dated in the 30th year of the Abhira king Vasushena.2930 It records the installation of a form of Vishnu.2930 Sircar dated it about 278.3132 He suggested that the Abhiras, from the Nasik region, briefly held the Ikshvaku kingdom.3132 See also Religion.

Later history

On the hill itself Longhurst found brick fortifications, using bricks of the same size as the Buddhist buildings.133 He also found later stone walls, which he attributed to local chiefs of the Vijayanagara period, and two small Hindu temples, but no Buddhist monuments.133

Longhurst reported a local tradition without endorsing it.34 It credited the destruction of the Buddhist buildings to followers of Shankaracharya.34 The valley’s cultivated land was held as a religious grant by the head of Shankaracharya’s followers, who lived at Pushpagiri.34

In 1959 D. C. Sircar suggested that the Pallava king Simhavarman, whose inscription was found nearby, may have destroyed the city at the end of the 3rd century.35 After reading the two Vijaya-year dates, he placed the Pallava conquest about the middle of the 4th century instead.15

The valley was not abandoned at once.36 A temple of the goddess Hariti, found in 1954–55, was dated by its sculpture to the 4th or 5th century.36 In the 1920s the valley’s only settlement was the hamlet of Pullareddigudem.33

Footnotes

  1. A. H. Longhurst, The Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), p. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  2. A. H. Longhurst, “Excavations at Nagarjunikonda”, Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India 1927–28 (1931), p. 113 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  3. Mackenzie, Manual of the Kistna District (1883), p. 151 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  4. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District (1883), p. 10 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  5. Mackenzie, Manual of the Kistna District (1883), p. 160 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  6. J. Ph. Vogel, Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist Site at Nagarjunikonda, Epigraphia Indica XX (1933), p. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  7. Vogel, Prakrit Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda (1933), p. 2 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  8. M. Hamid Kuraishi, “Trial Excavations at Alluru, Gummadidurru and Nagarjunikonda”, Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India 1926–27 (1930), p. 157 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  9. Longhurst, Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), p. 4 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  10. Longhurst, Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), p. 11 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  11. Vogel, Prakrit Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda (1933), p. 9 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  12. Vogel, Prakrit Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda (1933), p. 23 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  13. Vogel, Prakrit Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda (1933), p. 6 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  14. Sircar and Krishnan, “Two Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda” (1963), p. 20 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  15. D. C. Sircar, “More Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda”, Epigraphia Indica XXXV (1963–64), p. 6 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  16. Longhurst, Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), pp. 7–8 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  17. A. H. Longhurst, “Excavations at Nagarjunikonda”, Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India 1929–30 (1935), p. 148 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  18. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1956–57: A Review (1957), p. 36 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  19. B. Ch. Chhabra, “Nagarjunakonda Inscription of Ehavalasri’s time, Year 11”, Epigraphia Indica XXXIII (1959–60, publ. 1963), p. 147 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  20. Indian Archaeology 1957–58: A Review (1958), p. 9 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  21. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1955–56: A Review (1956), p. 23 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  22. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1958–59: A Review (1959), p. 5 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  23. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1957–58: A Review (1958), p. 5 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  24. Indian Archaeology 1957–58: A Review (1958), p. 6 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  25. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1959–60: A Review (1960), p. 9 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  26. Indian Archaeology 1955–56: A Review (1956), p. 24 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  27. D. C. Sircar and K. G. Krishnan, “Two Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda”, Epigraphia Indica XXXIV (1961–62, publ. 1963), p. 18 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  28. Chhabra, “Nagarjunakonda Inscription of Ehavalasri’s time” (1963), p. 148 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  29. D. C. Sircar, “Nagarjunikonda Inscription of the time of Abhira Vasushena, Year 30”, Epigraphia Indica XXXIV (1963), p. 197 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  30. Sircar, “Inscription of Abhira Vasushena” (1963), p. 198 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  31. Sircar, “Inscription of Abhira Vasushena” (1963), p. 201 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  32. Sircar, “Inscription of Abhira Vasushena” (1963), p. 202 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  33. Longhurst, Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), p. 2 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  34. Longhurst, Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), p. 6 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  35. D. C. Sircar, “Two Inscriptions from Guntur District”, Epigraphia Indica XXXII (1959), p. 89 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  36. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1954–55: A Review (1955), p. 23 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

Photos

Show all (47)

References

Sources (16)
  1. A. H. Longhurst, The Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda, Madras Presidency (Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India No. 54) (opens in a new tab), Manager of Publications, Delhi, 1938, pp. 1–4, 6–8, 10–11. [Public domain in India]
  2. Hirananda Sastri (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XX (1929–30) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1933, pp. 1–2, 6, 9, 23. J. Ph. Vogel, Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist Site at Nagarjunikonda. [Public domain]
  3. John Marshall (ed.), Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India, 1926-27 (opens in a new tab), Government of India, Central Publication Branch, Calcutta, 1930, pp. 157. M. Hamid Kuraishi, Trial Excavations at Alluru, Gummadidurru and Nagarjunikonda (season 1926–27). [Public domain]
  4. H. Hargreaves (ed.), Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India, 1927-28 (opens in a new tab), Government of India, Central Publication Branch, Calcutta, 1931, pp. 113–116, 118. [Public domain]
  5. Daya Ram Sahni (ed.), Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India, 1929-30 (opens in a new tab), Manager of Publications, Delhi, 1935, pp. 148. [Public domain]
  6. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District in the Presidency of Madras (opens in a new tab), Government of Madras (Lawrence Asylum Press), 1883, pp. 10, 151, 160. [Public domain]
  7. D. C. Sircar and B. Ch. Chhabra (eds.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXXII (1957–58) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1959, pp. 89. D. C. Sircar, Two Inscriptions from Guntur District (No. 8). [Public domain in India]
  8. D. C. Sircar (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXXIII (1959–60) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1963, pp. 147–148. B. Ch. Chhabra, Nagarjunakonda Inscription of Ehavalasri's time, Year 11 (No. 27); paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  9. D. C. Sircar (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXXIV (1961–62) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1963, pp. 18, 20, 197–198, 201–202. D. C. Sircar and K. G. Krishnan, Two Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda (No. 4); D. C. Sircar, Nagarjunikonda Inscription of the time of Abhira Vasushena, Year 30 (No. 30); paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  10. D. C. Sircar and G. S. Gai (eds.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXXV (1963–64) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1964, pp. 6. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  11. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1954–55: A Review (opens in a new tab), Department of Archaeology, Government of India, 1955, pp. 23. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  12. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1955–56: A Review (opens in a new tab), Department of Archaeology, Government of India, 1956, pp. 23–24. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  13. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1956–57: A Review (opens in a new tab), Department of Archaeology, Government of India, 1957, pp. 36. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  14. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1957–58: A Review (opens in a new tab), Department of Archaeology, Government of India, 1958, pp. 5–6, 9. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  15. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1958–59: A Review (opens in a new tab), Department of Archaeology, Government of India, 1959, pp. 5. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  16. A. Ghosh (ed.), Indian Archaeology 1959–60: A Review (opens in a new tab), Department of Archaeology, Government of India, 1960, pp. 9. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: