A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Temples & architecture

Stupas, rock-cut caves, temples, mosques, tombs and palaces, and how they were built.

Ramappa (Rudreswara) Temple at Palampet, a sandstone Kakatiya temple on a raised platform with a tall stepped tower, under a pale sky.
Ramappa (Rudreswara) Temple at Palampet, a sandstone Kakatiya temple on a raised platform with a tall stepped tower, under a pale sky. · Rangan Datta (opens in a new tab) · CC BY-SA 4.0 (opens in a new tab)

The Telugu country has buildings from more than two thousand years of history. The oldest are Buddhist stupas and monasteries, cut into rock or built of brick and limestone along the Krishna.123 Later came the temples of the Eastern Chalukya, Kakatiya and Vijayanagara periods.456 Then came the forts, mosques, tombs and palaces of Golconda and Hyderabad.78910 This page follows that order, with special attention to materials and methods: what was built of brick, earth, limestone, granite, sandstone or lime, and how. Individual monuments have their own pages, linked below. For the stone-built graves of the megalithic period, see Prehistory.

Stupas of the Krishna valley

A stupa is a solid dome raised over relics. The great stupa at Amaravati has almost disappeared.1 But James Burgess, who surveyed the site in 1881–82, worked out how it had probably been built.1 In his view its core, like that of the smaller stupa at Jaggayyapeta, was made of layers of earth a few feet thick.1 Each layer was levelled and covered with a floor of large, closely jointed bricks.1

The floors kept rainwater from swelling the earth, and prevented “any great lateral thrust”.1 Outside was a casing of brickwork, faced with slabs of “a beautiful greyish white limestone or marble”.1 Burgess thought the stone came from quarries on the bank of the Krishna, just south of Jaggayyapeta.11

The upright slabs of the outer rail stood about ten feet above the paved path.12 They were joined by three lens-shaped cross-bars set into holes cut in the slabs.12 Colin Mackenzie’s draughtsmen saw the slabs in 1816. They noted that “all the carvings appear originally to have been painted red and varnished”.13

Other stupas show other solutions. At Bhattiprolu, Alexander Rea found a solid brick dome 132 feet across.1415 Around its central well, the bricks were laid in a pattern that he thought looked like a lotus flower, perhaps on purpose.1415 At Ghantasala, the foundations formed a solid brick cube inside round walls.16 Walls running out from the centre divided the inside into thirty-two chambers packed with black mud.16

At Nagarjunakonda, A. H. Longhurst described the Great Stupa as “built in the form of a wheel”.17 Brick walls ran out like spokes from a central hub, and the spaces between them were filled with earth.17

Longhurst found that the stupas, monasteries and temples of the valley were built of large bricks laid in mud mortar.2 They were plastered, decorated in stucco and whitewashed.2 The pillars, floors and main sculptures were of white or grey limestone, the only stone used.2 Apsidal shrines (long halls with one rounded end) had barrel-vaulted brick roofs.18

Opposite each gateway of the lower Krishna stupas, a platform carried a row of five tall pillars.19 The inscriptions call them ayaka-khambha.19 J. Ph. Vogel noted that they carried emblems and dedication inscriptions, but did not hold anything up.19 The same tradition of white limestone carving reached Goli, in Palnad taluk. There, parts of a stupa were dug out of a small mound in 1926.20

Rock-cut monasteries and cave temples

Rock-cut architecture is rarer in the Telugu country than in western India. The 1910 edition of James Fergusson’s History of Indian and Eastern Architecture, revised by James Burgess, explains this by geology.3 The flat beds of trap rock in the Bombay Presidency were easy to cut.3 Its list of cave groups in the Madras Presidency names only Mamallapuram, Vijayawada (then Bezwada) and Guntupalle.3

Guntupalle is about 20 miles north of Eluru (then Ellore).2122 In 1887 Rea surveyed a dozen buried stupas and caves there, at five or six places.2122 The monks’ cells have vaulted verandahs, and arched “chaitya windows” over the doors.2122 A round cave 18 feet across holds a rock-cut stupa, now worshipped as a Shiva linga (stone emblem).2122 Its domed roof is carved with sixteen curved ribs and rings of rafters, copying timber work.2122

Fergusson’s book compared these caves with those at Junnar, and assigned them to about 200 BCE.23 A free-standing chaitya hall (Buddhist shrine hall) at Guntupalle, 53½ feet long, survived only as a few feet of wall.24

The caves near Vijayawada are later and Brahmanical. The best known is the four-storeyed rock-cut temple at Undavalli.25 On its third storey is a huge reclining figure of Vishnu.25 In 1870 J. A. C. Boswell thought the caves were Buddhist in origin.25 The 1883 Kistna district manual called them “undoubtedly of Brahmanical origin”.25 It reported Robert Sewell’s date for them, the 7th to 10th centuries. But it noted that no inscription that early had been read there.25

Sewell’s 1882 list credits the Eastern Chalukyas with “hewing out of durable temples from the solid rock”, including Undavalli.26 It says that after them, the Cholas built free-standing temples, not rock-cut ones.26 At Mogalrajapuram, two miles east of Vijayawada, Sewell recorded many rock-cut shrines and cells.27 They had pieces of inscriptions of about the 7th or 8th century.27

Temples of the Vengi kingdom

Royal temple building in the coastal delta is known mostly from inscriptions. A genealogy of 1202 credits the 9th-century king Narendra (Vijayaditya II) with founding 108 temples on the sites of 108 battles.428 It says that Chalukya-Bhima I founded the Shiva temple of Chalukya-Bhimeshvara at Bhimavaram, near Kakinada (then Cocanada).428 E. Hultzsch noted that this temple was still standing.428 An inscription of 958 records that Vijayaditya II had built the Umamaheshvara temple at Vijayawada.29 See Vengi.

The Bhimeshvara temple at Draksharamam is one of the “five aramas”.3031 These are shrines whose lingas are said to be pieces of a single linga.30 The 1907 Godavari gazetteer names the others as Bhimavaram, Palakollu and Amaravati.30 The temple’s linga is fourteen or fifteen feet high.3031 Its walls carry 271 inscriptions, copied in 1893 and dated from 1055 to 1447.3031

A Mackenzie manuscript describes Bikkavolu as an early Eastern Chalukya capital.32 It was said to have “extensive ruins and some deserted temples”.32

In Telangana, Henry Cousens’s 1900 list quotes an earlier account of Alampur, near where the Krishna and Tungabhadra meet.33 It describes temples of cut stone “profusely ornamented with sculpture”.33 Their unusual spire is described as “the frustrum of a square pyramid surmounted by a large and very compressed spheroid”.33

Kakatiya temples

Fergusson grouped the medieval temples of the Deccan under a “Chalukyan style”.5 The 1910 edition admitted that the Nizam’s territory was “almost a terra incognita” (unknown land) for architecture.5

The best-known example he did describe was the triple temple at Hanamkonda.3435 It has shrines to Shiva, Vishnu and Surya around a central hall.3435 Before it stood a granite porch on 132 free-standing pillars.3435 There was also a Nandi pavilion that had collapsed within the previous twenty-five years.3435 The temple, 102 by about 84 feet on a raised platform, had never been finished.3435

Fergusson’s text names its builder as “Pratapa Rudra” in 1162.34 But J. F. Fleet’s edition of the inscription, which Fergusson cites, gives Rudradeva and Saka 1084 (1162–63; Saka is an Indian way of counting years).3436 See Thousand Pillar Temple.

P. V. Parabrahma Sastry describes the Kakatiyas as taking over the Chalukya style while showing more local character.37 Their builders used local granite and sandstone up to the base of the tower, and brick and lime above it.37 Black granite was kept for pillars, door posts, lintels and images.37 He quotes an inscription from Kondaparti about a temple wall.37 Its black stones were joined so closely that it seemed cut from a single rock.37

Parabrahma Sastry also suggests that a workshop of sculptors at Orugallu supplied carved pieces to temples across the kingdom.38 Patrons were not only Shaiva. An inscription of 1117 beside the Padmakshi shrine at Hanamkonda records that the wife of a Kakatiya minister built a Jain basadi (temple).39

G. Yazdani’s 1922 study of the Ramappa temple at Palampet gives the clearest account of materials. The walls are of a pinkish sandstone.40 The decoration of the main temple uses “black basalt (hornblende)”, a much harder stone, highly polished.40

The tower over the shrine is built of “light spongy bricks”.41 Yazdani thought stone was avoided on purpose, to reduce the weight on the building.41 The enclosure wall is faced with huge stones, fitted without mortar around an earth core.42 Over the centuries, water washed the earth away. The facing stones then fell “like a house of cards”.42

Yazdani accepted that the temple stood for “the full development of the Medieval Deccan style” that Fergusson had called Chalukyan.43 He also noted objections to the label. He suggested “Dekhani” as the only other fitting name.43

In Warangal Fort, four carved stone gateways once framed a great temple.44 They stand 480 feet apart north to south, and 433 feet east to west.44 Fergusson’s History saw them as distant descendants of the gateways at Sanchi, whose form had begun in wood.44 He described the smaller temples in the fort as built without mortar, with joints “by no means well fitted”.44

After the Kakatiyas

The inscription over the gateway of the main mosque at Rajahmundry dates its building to 1324.45 The 1908 Imperial Gazetteer counted it among the earliest Muslim records in South India.45 The hill fortress of Kondavidu was a seat of the Reddi kings. Its walls of large stones run along the crests of a range of hills.46

Places of worship could be shared or fought over.47 At Draksharamam, the gazetteer records a revered mosque and the tomb of a saint, Saiyid Shah Bhaji Aulia.47 A local legend told how a Shaiva monastery there became his mosque.47

Vijayanagara temples in Rayalaseema

In Anantapur district, the Vijayanagara period left some of the finest temple work in the region.6 At Tadpatri, the local governor Ramalinga Nayudu began the Ramesvara temple on the Penner. He served under Krishna Deva Raya (1509–30).6 His son Timma Nayudu began the Chintala Tiruvenkatasvami temple.6

The gopuram (gateway tower) of the Chintala temple was “of stone below and brick and plaster above”, the usual method.48 Fergusson’s History suggested that the two gopurams of the Ramesvara temple might be the dynasty’s masterpieces.49 Unusually, their lower storeys are covered “with the most elaborate sculpture”.49

According to an inscription inside its outer wall, Virupanna built the Virabhadra temple at Lepakshi in 1538.50 A local story tells that he was a treasurer at Penukonda who spent royal money on it, and was blinded as a punishment.50

The temple’s great hall stands on sixty-six sculptured pillars, carved with musicians and dancers.5152 Its ceiling is painted with scenes from the epics and Puranas.5152 Its brick-and-plaster gopuram collapsed in 1903.5152 A huge stone bull lies some two hundred yards away.5152

The same book described the enclosure at Srisailam, about 630 by 510 feet.53 Its gopurams were of stone below and brick above.53 Sculptures set into its walls looked like those of the Hazara Rama temple at Vijayanagara.53

At Ahobilam, the book noted, local tradition gave an unfinished hall to Prataparudra, around 1300.54 But its style suggested a date after 1565.54 The palace at Chandragiri had three storeys of pillared halls, with brick walls and stone brackets.55 It was a rare surviving example of southern non-religious architecture.55

Golconda and Hyderabad

According to the Golconda chronicle, Ibrahim Qutb Shah (1550–1580) decided “to rebuild the fort of Golconda with stone and mortar”.7 Bilgrami describes bastions 50 to 60 feet high.56 Their granite blocks weighed at least a ton each, and were cemented together, some bound with clamps.56 In the new city of Hyderabad, the Charminar was “composed of lime and stone” and “full of fine, stucco decorations”.57

The Badshahi Ashur Khana was built in 1593–96 for the Muharram ceremonies.5859 It is known for inscriptions on Persian enamelled tiles.5859 Outer halls on “huge wooden colonnades” were added under Nizam Ali Khan.5859608 Bilgrami called its wooden wall panelling typical of “the old Asafiya style”.608

Sources differ on dates. The Imperial Gazetteer dates the Purana Pul, a bridge of 23 arches across the Musi, to 1593.8 Bilgrami dates it to 1578, under Ibrahim, and records that it was rebuilt in 1820.61 The Mecca Masjid was built “entirely of stone”.8

Tavernier was told about a single rock used for the prayer niche of the great mosque.62 It took 500 or 600 men five years to quarry, and 1,400 oxen to haul.62 Bilgrami applies this story to the Mecca Masjid.63 Tavernier’s editor identified the mosque as the Jami Masjid.62 Bilgrami names the overseers of the Mecca Masjid as Mir Faizullah Beg and Chaudhri Rangaiyah, with nearly 8,000 masons and labourers.63

The Qutb Shahi tombs are domed buildings of granite on arched terraces.9 Their stone coffins are of black basalt or greenstone. Their enamelled tiles had been stolen by 1909.9 Muhammad Quli’s dome was built in his lifetime.64

Opinions of the group differ.65 Fergusson found the tombs “splendid”, but showing “evident signs of a decadence”.65 The preface to Bilgrami’s guide ranks the Charminar, the Mecca Masjid and the tombs “among greatest Architectural creations of the East”.66 Fergusson’s History gives 1617 for the death of Hayat Bakhsh Begam.67 But the inscription on her stone coffin, as Bilgrami reads it, gives AH 1077 (1666; AH is the Islamic way of counting years).68

Under the Nizams and the British

The Imperial Gazetteer of 1909 lists the newer buildings of Hyderabad:1069

  • The Purani Haveli was built by the first Nizam.
  • The Chaumahalla palace had three courtyards with water tanks at their centre.
  • The Falaknuma was built on a hilltop by Sir Vikar-ul-Umara, and bought by the Nizam in 1897. It was judged unequalled in the city “in point of architecture or design”.1069

The British Residency was begun in 1800 under Russell of the Madras Engineers, and finished about 1807.69 Its Darbar Hall measured 60 by 33 feet, and was 50 feet high.69

French engineers in the Nizam’s service built the dam of the Mir Alam tank.70 They built it as a series of 21 half-round retaining walls.70 Well-to-do houses were of stone and brick. The mud houses of ordinary people were being replaced with brick.70

Reuse, ruin and conservation

Buildings were often taken apart for their materials. Slabs from Amaravati went into “various buildings, both public and private”.71 Those used in mosques were first rubbed smooth.71 At Ghantasala, Rea found Buddhist slabs re-carved with Hindu deities, and others broken up.72

At Goli, a slab carved with a seven-headed serpent was found in the mound in 1882.20 Villagers were worshipping it as “Nagamayya”.20 Cousens’s source says a mosque at Alampur was built on the ruins of temples.33 At Tadpatri, Aurangzeb’s troops damaged the hall of the Chintala temple. Morari Rao’s men later repaired it.6 Burgess complained that the clearing of Amaravati in 1880 was done without proper supervision.73

Conservation came late. The Hyderabad Archaeological Department wrote its own history.74 It says large sums were spent under Salar Jang I, but care was irregular until the department was set up in 1914.74 Yazdani was its first director.74

By 1936 the department had repaired the Hanamkonda temple and saved the roof and bracket figures at Palampet.75 It had also worked on the Pangal temple and laid out courts around the Qutb Shahi tombs.75

What this page does not cover

About the sources. The library’s sources say little about village shrines, wooden temple cars and halls, ordinary houses, churches and mission buildings, the public buildings of the coastal towns under British rule, or architecture after 1948. Engineering works such as the Godavari and Krishna anicuts (dams) are described on the Nizams and the British page.

Footnotes

  1. James Burgess, The Buddhist Stupas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 21 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  2. A. H. Longhurst, The Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), p. 7 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  3. James Fergusson, History of Indian and Eastern Architecture, rev. ed., Vol. I (1910), p. 129 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  4. E. Hultzsch, “Pithapuram Pillar Inscription of Mallapadeva”, Epigraphia Indica IV (1897), p. 226 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); translation, p. 239 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  5. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), p. 422 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  6. W. Francis, Madras District Gazetteers: Anantapur (1905), p. 199 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  7. Golconda chronicle, in Muhammad Qasim Ferishta, tr. John Briggs, History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India, Vol. III (1829), p. 409 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  8. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Hyderabad State (1909), p. 116 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  9. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 114 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  10. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 116 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  11. Burgess, Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 107 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  12. Burgess, Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 24 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  13. Burgess, Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 16, quoting Mackenzie’s 1816–17 survey (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  14. Alexander Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities (1894), p. 15 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  15. Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities (1894), p. 9 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  16. Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities (1894), p. 32 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  17. A. H. Longhurst, “Excavations at Nagarjunikonda”, Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India 1928–29 (1933), p. 101 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  18. Longhurst, Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), p. 8 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  19. J. Ph. Vogel, “Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist Site at Nagarjunikonda”, Epigraphia Indica XX (1933), p. 2 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  20. T. N. Ramachandran, Buddhist Sculptures from a Stupa near Goli Village, Guntur District (1929), p. 5 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  21. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), pp. 167–168 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  22. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), p. 168 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  23. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), p. 169 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  24. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), p. 128 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  25. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District (1883), p. 178 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  26. Robert Sewell, Lists of the Antiquarian Remains in the Presidency of Madras, Vol. I (1882), p. 42 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  27. Sewell, Lists of Antiquarian Remains, Vol. I (1882), p. 50 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  28. Hultzsch, Epigraphia Indica IV (1897), p. 227 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  29. Robert Sewell, The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (1932), p. 49 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  30. F. R. Hemingway, Madras District Gazetteers: Godavari, Vol. I (1907), p. 250 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  31. Hemingway, Godavari (1907), p. 251 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  32. Hemingway, Godavari (1907), p. 249 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  33. Henry Cousens, Lists of Antiquarian Remains in His Highness the Nizam’s Territories (1900), p. 35, quoting the Historical and Descriptive Sketch of His Highness the Nizam’s Dominions (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  34. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), p. 432 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  35. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), pp. 433–434 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  36. J. F. Fleet, “Sanskrit and Old-Canarese Inscriptions, No. CXVIII”, Indian Antiquary XI (1882), p. 9 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  37. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 299–300. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  38. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 303–304. ↩

  39. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 74. ↩

  40. G. Yazdani, The Temples at Palampet (1922), p. 179 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  41. Yazdani, Temples at Palampet (1922), p. 176 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  42. Yazdani, Temples at Palampet (1922), p. 175 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  43. Yazdani, Temples at Palampet (1922), p. 177 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  44. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), p. 435 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  45. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 296 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); see also p. 273 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  46. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 336 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  47. Hemingway, Godavari (1907), p. 251 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  48. Francis, Anantapur (1905), p. 200 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  49. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), pp. 403–404 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  50. Francis, Anantapur (1905), p. 172 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  51. Francis, Anantapur (1905), p. 173 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  52. Francis, Anantapur (1905), p. 174 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  53. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), p. 409 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  54. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), p. 404 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  55. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), pp. 417–418 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  56. Syed Ali Asgar Bilgrami, Landmarks of the Deccan (1927), p. 109 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  57. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), p. 18 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  58. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), p. 21 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  59. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), p. 24 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  60. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), p. 25 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  61. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), pp. 10–11 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  62. Jean-Baptiste Tavernier, tr. V. Ball, Travels in India, Vol. I (1889), p. 153 and note (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  63. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), pp. 39–41 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  64. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), p. 181 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  65. James Fergusson, History of Indian and Eastern Architecture, rev. ed., Vol. II (1910), p. 189 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  66. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), Preface to the Urdu edition, PDF p. 18 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  67. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. II (1910), p. 280 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  68. Bilgrami, Landmarks (1927), p. 169 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  69. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 117 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  70. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 118 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  71. Burgess, Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 15, quoting Mackenzie’s 1816–17 survey (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  72. Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities (1894), p. 38 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  73. Burgess, Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 19 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  74. The Story of the Archaeological Department, Hyderabad Deccan, 1914–1936 (1936), pp. 1–2 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  75. Story of the Archaeological Department (1936), p. 7 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

Photos

Show all (279)

References

Sources (24)
  1. James Burgess, The Buddhist Stupas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta in the Krishna District, Madras Presidency, Surveyed in 1882 (opens in a new tab), Trübner & Co. for the Archaeological Survey of Southern India, 1887, pp. 15–16, 19, 21, 24, 107–108. [Public domain]
  2. Alexander Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities, including the Stupas of Bhattiprolu, Gudivada and Ghantasala and other Ancient Sites in the Krishna District (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras (Archaeological Survey of India), 1894, pp. 9, 15, 32, 38. [Public domain]
  3. A. H. Longhurst, The Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda, Madras Presidency (Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India No. 54) (opens in a new tab), Manager of Publications, Delhi, 1938, pp. 7–8. [Public domain in India]
  4. H. Hargreaves (ed.), Annual Report of the Archaeological Survey of India, 1928-29 (opens in a new tab), Government of India, 1933, pp. 101. A. H. Longhurst, Excavations at Nagarjunikonda (season 1928–29). [Public domain]
  5. Hirananda Sastri (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XX (1929–30) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1933, pp. 2. J. Ph. Vogel, Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist Site at Nagarjunikonda. [Public domain]
  6. T. N. Ramachandran, Buddhist Sculptures from a Stupa near Goli Village, Guntur District (Bulletin of the Madras Government Museum, New Series, General Section, Vol. I, Pt. 1) (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1929, pp. 5. [Public domain]
  7. James Fergusson (rev. James Burgess), History of Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (revised ed.) (opens in a new tab), John Murray, London, 1910, pp. 128–129, 167–169, 403–404, 408–409, 417–418, 422, 432–435. [Public domain]
  8. James Fergusson (rev. James Burgess and R. Phené Spiers), History of Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. II (revised ed.) (opens in a new tab), John Murray, London, 1910, pp. 189, 280. [Public domain]
  9. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District in the Presidency of Madras (opens in a new tab), Government of Madras (Lawrence Asylum Press), 1883, pp. 178. [Public domain]
  10. Robert Sewell, Lists of the Antiquarian Remains in the Presidency of Madras, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1882, pp. 42, 50. [Public domain]
  11. F. Kielhorn (articles); E. Hultzsch (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. IV (1896–97) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1897, pp. 226–227, 239. E. Hultzsch, Pithapuram Pillar Inscription of Mallapadeva. [Public domain]
  12. Robert Sewell (ed. S. Krishnaswami Aiyangar), The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (Collected till 1923) and Outlines of Political History (opens in a new tab), University of Madras, 1932, pp. 49. [Public domain in India]
  13. F. R. Hemingway, Madras District Gazetteers: Godavari, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1907, pp. 249–251. [Public domain]
  14. Henry Cousens, Lists of Antiquarian Remains in His Highness the Nizam's Territories (Archaeological Survey of India, New Imperial Series XXXI) (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1900, pp. 35. [Public domain]
  15. J. F. Fleet, Sanskrit and Old-Canarese Inscriptions, No. CXVIII (Kakatya inscription of Rudradeva at Anamkond, Saka 1084), Indian Antiquary, Vol. XI (opens in a new tab), Indian Antiquary (ed. Jas. Burgess), Bombay, 1882, pp. 9. [Public domain]
  16. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal, Government of Andhra Pradesh, 1978, pp. 74, 299–300, 303–304. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  17. G. Yazdani, The Temples at Palampet (Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India, No. 6) (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, India, 1922, pp. 175–177, 179. [Public domain]
  18. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Madras, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1908, pp. 273, 296, 336. [Public domain]
  19. W. Francis, Madras District Gazetteers: Anantapur (opens in a new tab), Government of Madras (Addison & Co.), 1905, pp. 172–174, 199–200. [Public domain]
  20. Muhammad Qasim Ferishta (tr. John Briggs), History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India till the Year A.D. 1612, Vol. III (opens in a new tab), Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London, 1829, pp. 409. [Public domain]
  21. Syed Ali Asgar Bilgrami, Landmarks of the Deccan: A Comprehensive Guide to the Archaeological Remains of the City and Suburbs of Hyderabad (opens in a new tab), Government Central Press, Hyderabad-Deccan, 1927, Preface; 10–11, 18, 21, 24–25, 39–41, 108–109, 169, 181. [Public domain]
  22. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Hyderabad State (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1909, pp. 114–118. [Public domain]
  23. Jean-Baptiste Tavernier (tr. V. Ball), Travels in India, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Macmillan & Co., London, 1889, pp. 153. [Public domain]
  24. The story of the archaeological department Hyderabad deccan (opens in a new tab), 1936, pp. 1–2, 7. Public domain in India; paraphrased. [Public domain in India]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: