A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Bhongir

Town at the foot of a great isolated granite rock about thirty miles east of Hyderabad, crowned by a fort. The Warangal kings are said to have built the fort, and the Muslim rulers rebuilt it. The first Bahmani sultan took it in a year-long campaign in Telangana, and it became the eastern limit of his kingdom. Ahmad Shah I later gave it to his commander in Telangana as an estate.

A pointed-arch gateway in a high battlemented wall of dressed stone, reached by stone steps, with a person standing in the passage.
A pointed-arch gateway in a high battlemented wall of dressed stone, reached by stone steps, with a person standing in the passage. · Archaeological Department, H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions (G. Yazdani, Director) (opens in a new tab) · Public domain

The rock and the fort

The Imperial Gazetteer of 1909 describes Bhongir as the headquarters of a taluk of the Nalgonda district, “situated at the foot of a fortified rock”.1 It says the fort stands on an isolated rock whose eastern and southern sides “are quite unscalable” (impossible to climb).12

A citadel on top commands a view for long distances.12 Henry Cousens, listing the antiquities of the Nizam’s territories in 1900, called it “the famous old fort of Bhongir” and suggested that the name came from Bhavanagiri. The defences are in two parts: an upper fort on the summit, and a lower fort running west along a spur towards the village. A deep cleft between them has been dammed by cross walls into a descending chain of tanks, fed by channels cut in the rock. On the upper fort he found an old Muhammadan palace in ruins and a small bastion carrying two guns.3

A photographic survey of the Nizam’s dominions in 1898 counted nine tanks in the chain.4 It said that on a clear morning Golconda fort could be seen from the palace.4

Hindu walls and Muslim rebuilding

Cousens found what was “most interesting” about the fort. It was “a Muhammadan re-construction of a very ancient one said to have been built by the Warangal Kings”, one of the outworks of that city. Parts of the old walls and gates remained, of cyclopean masonry (huge stones), “while the latter is the poorest rubble”. A mutilated Nandi and temple pillars showed that a temple had once stood there.3

The Nizam’s Archaeological Department repaired the bastions, walls, gateways and the hilltop pavilion (baradari) in 1925–26.56 Its report says that the fort “is one of the earliest in the Deccan”.56 Like Warangal, it was once protected by an outer mud wall.56

The report separates the unmortared walls of huge blocks, “the work of early Hindu builders”, from walls of the Muslim period in coursed ashlar (cut stone).56 The first gateway is reached after a climb of about 125 feet.56 It is “of Muslim style”, with a barbican (outer defence) in front of it.56

G. Yazdani later grouped the walls of Bhongir with those of Warangal and Golconda as cyclopean work of Hindu kings.7 T. W. Haig wrote in 1907 that the people of Warangal would tell visitors that Bhongir was merely a bastion of the outermost of the seven walls of their old city.8 He worked out that such a wall would have run for 373 miles.8

The Bahmani frontier

The Burhan-i Ma’asir says that late in his reign the first Bahmani sultan, Ala-ud-din Bahman Shah, spent nearly a year in Telingana.9 He took “the district of Bhonngir”, overthrew its temples, and built mosques and schools in their place.9 His dominions then reached “from the east side of Daulatabad to Bhonagir and the river Godavari”.9

Haig says that the sultan subdued the country between Bhongir and Kohir.10 At the end of the reign the province of Bidar extended east “as far as Bhongir”.10 In his earlier book Haig called Bhongir “the frontier post of the Bahmani kingdom”.11 He thought it had been allowed to fall back into Hindu hands, perhaps in exchange for Kaulas, because the towns listed in the province of Bidar did not include it.11

In the reign of Ahmad Shah I, Telugu chiefs had retaken much of Telingana.12 The Burhan-i Ma’asir says that the king made Ibrahim Sanjar Khan commander of the army in Telingana.12 He gave him “as a jagir the fort of Bhonagir and several districts”.12

The Imperial Gazetteer adds that in 1709 a freebooter called Pap Rai plundered Warangal and Bhongir.12 He was later captured and executed.12

Footnotes

  1. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Hyderabad State (1909), p. 159 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  2. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 160 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  3. Henry Cousens, Lists of Antiquarian Remains in His Highness the Nizam’s Territories (1900), p. 51 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  4. A. Claude Campbell, Glimpses of the Nizam’s Dominions (1898), p. 495 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  5. Annual Report of the Archaeological Department of H.E.H. the Nizam’s Dominions, 1925–26 (1928), p. 9 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  6. Annual Report … 1925–26 (1928), p. 10 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  7. G. Yazdani, Bidar: Its History and Monuments (1947), p. 82, note (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  8. T. W. Haig, Historic Landmarks of the Deccan (1907), p. 69 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  9. J. S. King, The History of the Bahmani Dynasty, founded on the Burhan-i Ma’asir (1900), p. 21 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  10. Wolseley Haig (ed.), The Cambridge History of India, Vol. III (1928), p. 375 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  11. Haig, Historic Landmarks of the Deccan (1907), p. 73 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  12. King, History of the Bahmani Dynasty (1900), p. 62 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

Photos

References

Sources (8)
  1. Henry Cousens, Lists of Antiquarian Remains in His Highness the Nizam's Territories (Archaeological Survey of India, New Imperial Series XXXI) (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1900, pp. 51. [Public domain]
  2. A. Claude Campbell, Glimpses of the Nizam's Dominions, Being an Exhaustive Photographic History of the Hyderabad State, Deccan, India (opens in a new tab), C. B. Burrows, Bombay, 1898, pp. 495–496. [Public domain]
  3. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Hyderabad State (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1909, pp. 159–160. [Public domain]
  4. Archaeological Department, H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions, Annual Report of the Archaeological Department of H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions, 1925-26 (opens in a new tab), Baptist Mission Press, Calcutta, 1928, pp. 9–10; pls. XI–XIII. [Public domain]
  5. T. W. Haig, Historic Landmarks of the Deccan (opens in a new tab), Pioneer Press, Allahabad, 1907, pp. 69, 73. [Public domain]
  6. J. S. King, The History of the Bahmani Dynasty, founded on the Burhan-i Ma'asir (opens in a new tab), Luzac and Co., London, 1900, pp. 21, 62. [Public domain]
  7. Wolseley Haig (ed.), The Cambridge History of India, Vol. III: Turks and Afghans (opens in a new tab), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1928, pp. 375. [Public domain]
  8. G. Yazdani, Bidar: Its History and Monuments (opens in a new tab), Oxford University Press (for H.E.H. the Nizam's Government), London, 1947, pp. 82, note. Cite-only; paraphrased. [Cited, not reproduced]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: