A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Forts & warfare

Hill forts, city walls, armies and the battles that changed who ruled the region.

Golconda Fort's granite walls and a gate climbing toward the hilltop citadel.
Golconda Fort's granite walls and a gate climbing toward the hilltop citadel. · Bernard Gagnon (opens in a new tab) · CC BY-SA 3.0 (opens in a new tab)

The Telugu country is full of forts. Warangal, the Kakatiya capital, had a fort of mud and a fort of stone.12 Bhongir and Gooty were hill forts on great masses of bare rock.34 On the coast, the zamindars lived in mud forts.5 Many turning points in the region’s history were sieges of these places. This page follows how forts and armies changed, from the first walled towns to the end of the Nizam’s army in 1948.67 For the two best-documented forts, see Warangal Fort and Golconda Fort.

About the sources. Most of what is known comes from the attackers. Court historians of the sultans tell of the Delhi campaigns. A chronicle written for the Qutb Shahi kings tells of the Golconda wars. British officers and historians tell of the 18th-century wars. Each describes its own side’s victories and the other side’s defeat, often in religious terms. Where they can be checked against inscriptions or each other, this page says so.

Walled towns and river citadels

The earliest description of the region’s military power comes from the Roman writer Pliny, in the 1st century CE.6 He wrote of a people he called the Andarae, whom James Burgess took to be the Andhras.6 He said their king had thirty towns fortified with walls and towers.6 He gave him an army of 100,000 infantry and 2,000 cavalry, and 1,000 elephants.6 His figures are a report from far away and cannot be checked.

The excavated capital of the Ikshvakus was Vijayapuri, at Nagarjunakonda. It shows what a fortified city of the 3rd century could look like.8 A. H. Longhurst, who dug there, described a valley closed in by hills on three sides and by the Krishna on the fourth.8

Nagarjuna’s Hill was a rock plateau with cliffs all round. It had been strengthened into a citadel with walls of brick and stone.8 Its bricks matched those of the Buddhist monuments in the valley below.8 A second fortified hill guarded the approach from the river. A line of ramparts with a gateway once joined the two hills.8

Longhurst thought the site must have been almost impossible to capture in early times.8 He dated the long stone walls on the northern slopes much later, to a local chief of about the 16th century.8 The Ikshvaku inscriptions name nobles with military titles such as mahasenapati, “great commander”.9 Their editor, J. Ph. Vogel, compared this title with the European title of duke.9

Warangal and the Delhi sieges

According to P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, the Kakatiya capital Orugallu (Warangal) had two rings of walls.10 The outer ring was a mud rampart with a moat. The inner ring was a stone wall with its own moat.10

The Delhi armies that besieged Warangal described the same two walls.1 Amir Khusrau was the poet who went with Malik Kafur in 1309–10.1 He wrote that the mud wall was “so strong that a spear of steel could not pierce it”. He gave its circuit as 12,546 yards.1

Khusrau tells how the attackers built a wooden stockade round their own camp.11 They battered the wall with stone-throwing engines and filled the ditch. Then the king agreed to pay tribute.11 The historian Barani adds that the defenders had gathered in the mud fort, which was stronger than the stone one.2

In the 1320s Prince Ulugh Khan, later Sultan Muhammad bin Tughluq, besieged Warangal twice.12 He took it on the second attempt.12 Barani dates the campaign to 1321.12 Parabrahma Sastry follows the historian Isami and places the fall in 1323.1213

The Kakatiya army itself is known mainly from inscriptions and from later Telugu chronicles.14 Parabrahma Sastry describes the nayamkara system. Under it, nayakas (military chiefs) held villages in return for keeping a fixed number of elephants, horses and foot soldiers for the king.14 In his reading, Rudramadevi brought it in and Prataparudra organised it.14

A later chronicle says Prataparudra gave the 77 bastions of Warangal to as many nayakas of the Velama community.14 A verse boasts of nine lakh archers.14 Parabrahma Sastry points out that the inscriptions name nayakas of other communities, Reddis among them. So the chronicle’s picture cannot be taken literally.14

Inscriptions point to garrison villages, where soldiers were kept from a special tax.15 Examples are Pedakonduru in Tenali taluk, Maktal in Mahbubnagar and Kopparam in Guntur. Hero stones stand near some of them.15 Kayastha chiefs commanded the cavalry.15 Ganapatideva brought one of them from the north to train his horsemen.15

Horses for these armies came largely from overseas. Ganapatideva’s edict of 1244–45 at Motupalli lists horses and elephants among the cargoes that wrecked ships had once lost to the king.16 More than a century later, the Bahmani sultan Muhammad I was told that a prince of Warangal had forced horse dealers to sell him their best horses cheaply.17 In Wolseley Haig’s account, this incident brought fresh war on Warangal.17

Hill forts after Warangal

After 1323, power in the Telugu country rested on hill forts. The first Bahmani sultan took the rock fortress of Bhongir and made it his frontier post.3 Wolseley Haig described Bhongir as one of the “strange mammiform masses of solid rock” of Telangana.3

The Bahmanis gained Golconda by treaty from Warangal.18 The Imperial Gazetteer dates this cession to 1364.18 In 1459 a Bahmani army was sent against the “revolted Telugu fortress” of Devarakonda. The Raja of Orissa defeated it.19

On the coast, the Reddis ruled from the hill fortress of Kondavidu.20 Its stone walls ran along the crests of a small range for many miles.20 The same family built Kondapalli, above the Krishna, about 1360.21 Its later history shows how often such places changed hands:21

  • the Bahmanis took it in 1471, and again from a garrison in revolt in 1477
  • Krishnadeva Raya of Vijayanagara took it about 1515
  • Sultan Quli of Golconda took it in 1531
  • the Mughals took it in 1687
  • a British force took it in 176621

In Rayalaseema, Gooty was a ring of rocky hills enclosed by a stone rampart with round bastions.4 Its citadel stood on a great rock about 1,000 feet above the plain. It was watered by cisterns cut into the rock.4 Western Chalukya inscriptions of 1121–22 on the summit show it was already important.22

A Sanskrit verse at Gooty praises “Gutti-durga” as “the king of forts”.22 It calls the fort the centre of the wheel of Bukka’s rule.22 E. Hultzsch assigned the verse to the Vijayanagara king Bukka I (1343–79).22

At Gandikota, on the gorge of the Penner, a temple chronicle credits the fort to a “Kaka Maharaju” in about 1290.23 The Cuddapah gazetteer of 1915 suggested that this was a Kakatiya king or his viceroy.23 Under Vijayanagara, Gandikota was the seat of a district.23

Golconda and the age of gunpowder

Sultan Quli founded the Qutb Shahi kingdom. The Golconda chronicle quotes him as claiming between sixty and seventy forts in Telangana and on the coast.24 Among them were Rajakonda, Devarakonda, Bhongir, Warangal, Khammam, Kondapalli and Eluru (then Ellore).24 The chronicle presents these wars as a campaign against “infidels”.24

One of his opponents was Sitapati of Khammam.25 He held Khammam, Bellamkonda and Warangal with 12,000 infantry, described as good marksmen.25

Golconda’s own forts were guarded by Hindu infantry.26 The chronicle calls them Naigwaries (nayakwaris).26 Briggs, its translator, noted that in his day the name was used only for Hindu infantry garrisons.26 Their loyalty mattered.27 The Naigwaries of Kondapalli rebelled for four months under Sultan Quli.27 In the struggle over the throne in 1550, the Naigwary garrisons of Kovilkonda and Golconda changed sides.27

An invasion reached the outskirts of Golconda.28 After it, Ibrahim Qutb Shah rebuilt Golconda itself in stone.28 The Imperial Gazetteer describes the finished fort as a wall with battlements, more than three miles round.29 It had 87 bastions, some still carrying large guns.29

Artillery decided the battle of Talikota on 23 January 1565.30 The Anantapur gazetteer follows the Persian histories.30 It describes the allied sultans’ 600 guns, drawn up in three lines in front of Rama Raya’s centre.30 His troops rallied for a charge. Then heavy guns loaded with bags of copper coin were fired into them at close range.30

Rama Raya was captured and beheaded.31 The surviving Vijayanagara court fled to the hill fort of Penukonda, which became its capital.31

Fourteen years later, Golconda’s general besieged Kondavidu.32 He first failed to take it by climbing the walls with ladders.32 Then he dragged his guns up the hill and broke through one face of the wall.32 He took the fort in April 1579, when elephants forced open one side of the gate.32

The last great siege was of Golconda itself. In 1687 Aurangzeb’s army spent more than eight months before the fort.33 J. D. B. Gribble follows the historian Khafi Khan, who saw the siege.33 He describes trenches pushed up to the moat, and 50,000 cotton bags of earth thrown into it.33 The Mughals dug mines under the walls, and the defender Abdur Razzak Lari dug against them.33 The fort fell only when another commander, Abdullah Khan Pani, opened a gate at night.33

A Mughal gun called Azhdaha Paikar still lies on the Musa Burj bastion.34 Syed Ali Asgar Bilgrami counted it among the guns used in this siege.34

Poligars, zamindars and mud forts

After Talikota, much of Rayalaseema was held by poligars.35 These were local chiefs who paid tribute to the sultans but were “virtually in independent power”.35 Gooty passed through many hands. The Maratha soldier Morari Rao made it his home in 1754 and repaired its walls.36 A pavilion on the citadel was still called Morari Rao’s seat in 1908.3637

The East India Company took over the Ceded Districts in 1800.38 Its officers found a land of armed villages.38 William Thackeray, one of Thomas Munro’s assistants, wrote in 1807 that “every village was a garrison”.38 He wrote that village headmen and accountants had become “captains of banditti garrisoning independent castles”.38 His account justified the Company’s takeover and should be read with that in mind.38

Munro’s first step, the Imperial Gazetteer says, was to end the power of “the eighty or more poligars” of the Ceded Districts.39 Some ruined buildings at Gooty served as his prisons for those who resisted.37

On the coast, the zamindars (landholders) of the Northern Circars lived in mud forts and kept bodies of local troops.5 In 1754 the French commander Bussy required them to keep a militia of 12,000 men.40

The most famous siege of such a fort was at Bobbili in January 1757.41 Bussy attacked the chief Ranga Rao at the urging of his rival, the Raja of Vizianagaram.41 The Vizagapatam gazetteer quotes the British historian Robert Orme’s description of the fort:41

  • a square of clay walls about 200 yards across, with round towers at the corners
  • firing holes made from clay pipes, and a thatched roof over the rampart
  • a belt of thick forest several miles deep, crossed by a single winding path41

After a day of attacks, Orme wrote, the defenders killed their own wives and children rather than let them be captured.42 Then they died on the walls. Ranga Rao was shot in the final attack.42 Three nights later, two of his men stabbed the Raja of Vizianagaram to death in his tent.42 For the Bobbili ballad, see Folk songs & oral traditions.

The Anglo-French war decided the fate of the coast.43 In December 1758 a British force under Colonel Forde, with the troops of Vizianagaram, defeated the French at Condore near Pithapuram.43 In April 1759 it stormed Machilipatnam (then Masulipatam) after a month’s siege.43

The Company’s armies and the Nizam’s forces

From 1766 the Nizams paid for their alliance with the Company in troops and land.44 The treaty that gave up the Northern Circars promised the Nizam a British force in time of war.44 In 1798 he accepted a permanent subsidiary force of 6,000 sepoys with guns.44 In 1800 he gave up the Ceded Districts to pay for making it larger.44

In 1853 the Hyderabad Contingent became an extra force kept by the British for the Nizam’s use.45 It was paid for by assigning Berar and other districts to the British.45 Kondapalli kept a small British garrison until 1859.21

In 1901 the Nizam’s own army numbered 24,012 men.46 Of these, 6,481 were regulars and the rest were irregular troops.46 British forces in the state in 1903 numbered 2,988 European and 5,549 Indian soldiers.46 They were stationed mainly at Secunderabad and Bolarum.46

Indian troops entered the state on 13 September 1948, in the operation officially called a “police action”.7 The Nizam ordered a ceasefire on 17 September.7 The Nizam’s army came to an end after this.7 The 1951 census lists the disbanding of the Hyderabad army among the changes that disturbed Muslim life in the state after 1948.47 Muslims had held most of the posts in that army.47 The events of 1947–48 are told on Reform, freedom & people’s movements.

Footnotes

  1. H. M. Elliot and John Dowson, The History of India as Told by Its Own Historians, vol. III (1871), pp. 80–81 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  2. Elliot and Dowson, History of India, vol. III (1871), p. 202 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  3. Haig, Historic Landmarks of the Deccan (1907), p. 73 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  4. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 489 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  5. F. R. Hemingway, Madras District Gazetteers: Godavari, Vol. I (1907), p. 161 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  6. James Burgess, The Buddhist Stupas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 3, quoting Pliny (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); Robert Sewell, The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (1932), p. 14 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  7. Sarojini Regani, Highlights of the Freedom Movement in Andhra Pradesh (1956), pp. 232–234 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  8. A. H. Longhurst, The Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), pp. 1–3 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  9. J. Ph. Vogel, “Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist Site at Nagarjunikonda”, Epigraphia Indica XX (1933), pp. 5–6 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  10. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 174. ↩ ↩2

  11. Elliot and Dowson, History of India, vol. III (1871), pp. 81–84 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  12. Elliot and Dowson, History of India, vol. III (1871), pp. 231–233 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  13. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 136–139. ↩

  14. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 195. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  15. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 195–196. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  16. E. Hultzsch, “Motupalli Pillar-Inscription of Ganapatideva”, Epigraphia Indica XII (1914), p. 196 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  17. T. Wolseley Haig, Historic Landmarks of the Deccan (1907), pp. 74–75 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  18. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Hyderabad State (1909), pp. 113–114 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  19. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District (1883), p. 17 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  20. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 336 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  21. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 323 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  22. W. Francis, Madras District Gazetteers: Anantapur (1905), pp. 155–156 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  23. C. F. Brackenbury, Madras District Gazetteers: Cuddapah, Vol. I (1915), pp. 191–192 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  24. Golconda chronicle, in Muhammad Qasim Ferishta, tr. John Briggs, History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India, Vol. III (1829), pp. 352–353 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  25. Briggs, Rise of the Mahomedan Power, Vol. III (1829), p. 360 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  26. Briggs, Rise of the Mahomedan Power, Vol. III (1829), p. 384 and note (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  27. Briggs, Rise of the Mahomedan Power, Vol. III (1829), pp. 368, 392–393 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  28. Briggs, Rise of the Mahomedan Power, Vol. III (1829), p. 409 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  29. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), pp. 113–114 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  30. Francis, Anantapur (1905), p. 19 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  31. Francis, Anantapur (1905), p. 20 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  32. Briggs, Rise of the Mahomedan Power, Vol. III (1829), pp. 437–438 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  33. J. D. B. Gribble, A History of the Deccan, Vol. I (1896), pp. 304–307 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  34. Syed Ali Asgar Bilgrami, Landmarks of the Deccan (1927), pp. 109, 180 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  35. Francis, Anantapur (1905), p. 22 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  36. Francis, Anantapur (1905), p. 157 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  37. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 490 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  38. Francis, Anantapur (1905), pp. 105–106, quoting Thackeray’s report of 8 September 1807 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  39. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 443 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  40. Hemingway, Godavari (1907), p. 30 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  41. W. Francis, Madras District Gazetteers: Vizagapatam, Vol. I (1907), pp. 237–238, quoting Robert Orme (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  42. Francis, Vizagapatam (1907), pp. 239–240, quoting Orme (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  43. Hemingway, Godavari (1907), pp. 31–32 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  44. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 16 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  45. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 17 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  46. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), pp. 69–70 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  47. Census of India, 1951, Vol. IX: Hyderabad, Part I-A: Report (1953), pp. 111–112 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

Photos

Show all (80)

References

Sources (20)
  1. James Burgess, The Buddhist Stupas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta in the Krishna District, Madras Presidency, Surveyed in 1882 (opens in a new tab), Trübner & Co. for the Archaeological Survey of Southern India, 1887, pp. 3. [Public domain]
  2. Robert Sewell (ed. S. Krishnaswami Aiyangar), The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (Collected till 1923) and Outlines of Political History (opens in a new tab), University of Madras, 1932, pp. 14. [Public domain in India]
  3. A. H. Longhurst, The Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda, Madras Presidency (Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India No. 54) (opens in a new tab), Manager of Publications, Delhi, 1938, pp. 1–3. [Public domain in India]
  4. Hirananda Sastri (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XX (1929–30) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1933, pp. 5–6. J. Ph. Vogel, Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist Site at Nagarjunikonda. [Public domain]
  5. H. M. Elliot and John Dowson (eds.), The History of India as Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period, Vol. III (opens in a new tab), Trübner and Co., London, 1871, pp. 80–84, 202, 231–233. [Public domain]
  6. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal, Government of Andhra Pradesh, 1978, pp. 136–139, 174, 195–196. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  7. Sten Konow (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XII (1913–14) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1914, pp. 196. E. Hultzsch, Motupalli Pillar-Inscription of Ganapatideva. [Public domain]
  8. T. W. Haig, Historic Landmarks of the Deccan (opens in a new tab), Pioneer Press, Allahabad, 1907, pp. 73–75. [Public domain]
  9. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Hyderabad State (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1909, pp. 16–17, 69–70, 113–114. [Public domain]
  10. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Madras, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1908, pp. 323, 336, 443, 489–490. [Public domain]
  11. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District in the Presidency of Madras (opens in a new tab), Government of Madras (Lawrence Asylum Press), 1883, pp. 17. [Public domain]
  12. W. Francis, Madras District Gazetteers: Anantapur (opens in a new tab), Government of Madras (Addison & Co.), 1905, pp. 19–20, 22, 105–106, 155–157. [Public domain]
  13. C. F. Brackenbury, Madras District Gazetteers: Cuddapah, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1915, pp. 191–192. [Public domain]
  14. Muhammad Qasim Ferishta (tr. John Briggs), History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India till the Year A.D. 1612, Vol. III (opens in a new tab), Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London, 1829, pp. 352–353, 360, 368, 384, 392–393, 409, 437–438. [Public domain]
  15. J. D. B. Gribble, A History of the Deccan, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Luzac & Co., London, 1896, pp. 304–307. [Public domain]
  16. Syed Ali Asgar Bilgrami, Landmarks of the Deccan: A Comprehensive Guide to the Archaeological Remains of the City and Suburbs of Hyderabad (opens in a new tab), Government Central Press, Hyderabad-Deccan, 1927, pp. 109, 180. [Public domain]
  17. F. R. Hemingway, Madras District Gazetteers: Godavari, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1907, pp. 30–32, 161. [Public domain]
  18. W. Francis, Madras District Gazetteers: Vizagapatam, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1907, pp. 237–240. Quotes Robert Orme's history of the British military transactions in India on Bobbili. [Public domain]
  19. Sarojini Regani, Highlights of the Freedom Movement in Andhra Pradesh (opens in a new tab), Ministry of Cultural Affairs, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, 1956, pp. 232–234. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  20. C. K. Murthy, Census of India, 1951, Vol. IX: Hyderabad, Part I-A - Report (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Hyderabad-Dn., 1953, pp. 111–112. [Public domain in India]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: