A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Tirupati and Tirumala

Pilgrim town at the foot of the Tirumala hills in the old North Arcot (later Chittoor) district, and the hill town of Tirumala above it. Tirumala has the temple of Venkatesvara, which James Fergusson's revisers called the most sacred in the Madras Presidency. Krishnadeva Raya visited it after his eastern wars, gave it jewels and set up copper statues of himself and his queens. The later Aravidu kings made their grants before its god and lived at Chandragiri, in sight of the hill.

High-contrast halftone of a standing stone figure of a king with a tall crown, hands joined, on a base. Printed sideways.
High-contrast halftone of a standing stone figure of a king with a tall crown, hands joined, on a base. Printed sideways. · H. Krishna Sastri, Archaeological Survey of India, Annual Report 1911-12 (Government of India, 1915); photograph taken for the purpose (p. 189, note 3) (opens in a new tab) · Public domain

The North Arcot manual of 1894 describes “Tirupati: Sometimes called Lower Tirupati to distinguish it from Upper Tirupati or Tirumala, the sacred hill of pilgrimage”.12 It says that the lower town “is irregularly built, with narrow and dirty streets”.12 The manual adds that “were it not for the sanctity of the temple on the hills, the place would soon sink into insignificance”.12 This is because “it is from the pilgrims that the residents derive their livelihood”.12

The town has fifteen temples.12 The chief are those of Govindarajasvami and Ramasvami, and of these “the former has an imposing gopuram” (gateway tower).12

Tirumala, “or the holy hill”, stands on top of the range 6 miles away.34 The manual found the town “a most disappointing sight”.34 It said that “the only structure really deserving notice is the thousand-pillared mantapam on the skirts of the town”.34 It judged this hall later than the temple.34 See the Tirumala temple and Chandragiri.

The hill temple

James Fergusson’s revisers wrote in 1910 that the hill temple “was reputed to be the richest, the most magnificent, as it was certainly the most sacred of all those in the Presidency”.56 It was so sacred “that no unbelieving foreigner had ever been allowed to climb the holy hill”.56

J. D. B. Gribble entered it in 1870 with a party pursuing a murderer.56 He exclaimed, “Another of the illusions of my youth destroyed”.56 The revisers judged it “a fair specimen of a Dravidian temple of the second class, but in a sad state of dilapidation and disrepair”.56

Vijayanagara at Tirumala

The Tirumala temple keeps records of Krishnadeva Raya of 1514 in Telugu, Kannada and Tamil.78 In V. Rangacharya’s summary, one of them mentions “Krishnaraya’s attack on Prataparudra Gajapati”.78 Two records of 1512–13 record gifts by his queens.78

The Telugu Rayavachakamu says that at Tirupati the king performed the sixteen great gifts and presented jewels and gold.9 It says that he set up copper statues of himself and his queens Tirumala Devi and Chinna Devi before the god.9 H. Krishna Sastri published a photograph of the statues in 1915.10

The Kondavidu pillar inscription of 1520 levies customs for the god Raghunayaka.11 They were collected “at roads frequented (by people), such as (those to) the Tirumala hills”.11 See the Tirumala inscriptions and Krishnadeva Raya.

Krishna Sastri noted that the copper-plate grants of Venkatapati all bear the signature sri Venkatesa.10 They were made “in the presence of the god Venkatesa on the hill at Tirumala”.10 From this, a move of the capital from Penukonda to Chandragiri, “a town close to Tirupati”, has been inferred.10 A labelled copper statue of Venkatapatiraya stands at the entrance of the temple.10 See Venkatapati II.

Footnotes

  1. Arthur F. Cox, rev. Harold A. Stuart, Madras District Manuals: North Arcot, Vol. II (1894), p. 326 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  2. Cox and Stuart, North Arcot Manual, Vol. II (1894), p. 327 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  3. Cox and Stuart, North Arcot Manual, Vol. II (1894), p. 328 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  4. Cox and Stuart, North Arcot Manual, Vol. II (1894), p. 331 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  5. James Fergusson, History of Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I, revised by James Burgess (1910), p. 404, note 2 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  6. Fergusson, Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (1910), p. 407, note continued (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  7. V. Rangacharya, A Topographical List of the Inscriptions of the Madras Presidency, Vol. I (1919), p. 472, Chittoor No. 9-A (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  8. Rangacharya, Topographical List, Vol. I (1919), p. 473, Chittoor Nos. 9-M and 9-N (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  9. S. Krishnaswami Aiyangar (ed.), Sources of Vijayanagar History (1919), p. 117, extract from the Rayavachakamu (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  10. H. Krishna Sastri, “The Third Vijayanagara Dynasty; its Viceroys and Ministers”, Archaeological Survey of India, Annual Report 1911–12 (1915), p. 189 and note 3 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  11. H. Luders and H. Krishna Sastri, “Kondavidu Inscription of Krishnaraya”, Epigraphia Indica VI (1900–01), p. 232 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

Photos

References

Sources (6)
  1. Arthur F. Cox (rev. Harold A. Stuart), Madras District Manuals: North Arcot, Vol. II (new edition) (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1894, pp. 326–331. [Public domain]
  2. V. Rangacharya, A Topographical List of the Inscriptions of the Madras Presidency (collected till 1915), with Notes and References, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1919, pp. 472–475. [Public domain]
  3. James Fergusson (rev. James Burgess), History of Indian and Eastern Architecture, Vol. I (revised ed.) (opens in a new tab), John Murray, London, 1910, pp. 404, 407. [Public domain]
  4. S. Krishnaswami Aiyangar, Sources of Vijayanagar History (opens in a new tab), University of Madras, 1919, pp. 117. [Public domain]
  5. Archaeological Survey of India (ed. J. H. Marshall), Archaeological Survey of India, Annual Report 1911-12 (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1915, pp. 189. H. Krishna Sastri. [Public domain]
  6. E. Hultzsch (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. VI (1900–01) (opens in a new tab), Government of India, Calcutta, 1901, pp. 232. [Public domain]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: