A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Trade & economy

Ports such as Motupalli and Machilipatnam, Golconda diamonds, tanks and farming, merchant guilds.

Two-page photograph of the head of the Eastern Delta main canal with country boats in the lock and people standing on the bank.
Two-page photograph of the head of the Eastern Delta main canal with country boats in the lock and people standing on the bank. · George T. Walch (opens in a new tab) · Public domain

For most of its history, the Telugu country lived from the land. Rice grew in the deltas of the Krishna and the Godavari.12 On the dry uplands of Telangana and Rayalaseema, farming depended on tanks, reservoirs made by damming streams.12

Two other things made the region known abroad.345 One was a long coast with ports that traded across the Bay of Bengal and beyond. The other was goods that the rest of the world wanted, above all fine cotton cloth and diamonds.345

About the sources. The evidence comes in layers. For the early centuries there are a Greek sailing guide, Buddhist donation records and coin finds. For the Kakatiya period there are inscriptions. For the Golconda kingdom there are the reports of European merchants and a French jeweller. From about 1800 there are the statistics of British and Hyderabad officials. Each kind of writer saw what mattered to him: the merchants saw the coast, the jeweller the mines, and the officials revenue and exports. The page notes this where it matters.

The early coast and Rome

The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea is a guide written by a Greek-speaking merchant in the first century CE.3 It describes a region called Masalia “stretching a great way along the coast before the inland country”, where “a great quantity of muslins is made”.3

W. H. Schoff, its translator, identified Masalia with Ptolemy’s Maisolia, and with the later Machilipatnam (then Masulipatam).6 He thought it was then “the greatest market of the Andhra kingdom”.6 Robert Sewell summed up the classical writers. He noted that large numbers of Roman coins had been found in South India.7 He quoted Pliny’s complaint that India drained the Roman empire of 550 million sesterces a year.7

Some of that gold reached the Telugu coast. In 1786 or 1787 (the sources differ by a year), a farmer near Nellore found a small pot of Roman gold coins under the remains of a Hindu shrine.89 Most were of the emperors Trajan and Hadrian and of the empress Faustina. Many were melted down before about thirty were recovered.89 Gold coins of Hadrian were found again at Tangutur in 1903.8

A. H. Longhurst, who excavated Nagarjunakonda, saw Roman influence in some of its sculptures.10 This sea trade had brought “vast quantities of Roman gold” into South India.11 Longhurst suggested that its decline was one reason why the Buddhist centres of the lower Krishna declined.1011

Local trade has left its own traces. Among the lead coins of the Andhra kings found at Gudivada was a type showing a two-masted ship.12 The donors named in the inscriptions of the Amaravati stupa (relic mound) include merchants and their families:131415

  • the wife of a merchant named Nagatisa, giving with her sons, among them the goldsmith Budhi13
  • a dealer called Kuta14
  • Siridata, a dealer in perfumes and son of a merchant15

One slab was given by a donor described as “the Tamil Kanha”, with his brother and sister.16 At Bhattiprolu, one of the relic caskets lists the members of a negama. Georg Bühler translated this word as a guild or town corporation.17

The library has little on trade under the Ikshvakus, Vishnukundins and Eastern Chalukyas. This page passes over those centuries rather than guess.

Kakatiya markets and guilds

The Kakatiya inscriptions are much richer. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry studied them closely.18 He describes a countryside organised around the sthala, a group of villages with its own officers for accounts and tolls.18 Each had a weekly fair, the pemta or santa.1819

An inscription of 1310 at Koccherlakota shows how such a fair worked.1819 Traders rented thatched sheds by the week. They paid again to bring goods into the market yard, and paid a registration fee on everything they sold.1819 Sales taxes were farmed out (rented out) to toll-collectors. Even hawkers who carried goods in head-baskets paid a toll.19

A long inscription of Ganapatideva in Warangal Fort, dated about 1228, lays out the capital’s market.2021 It names groups of merchants and the goods each dealt in: cloth, indigo, areca nuts, betel leaves, vegetables and fruit, grain and oil, salt, metals, perfumes, pearls and beads, and yarn.2021

Parabrahma Sastry identifies this market, called Mathiya, with Mattewada.2223 Mattewada is still the business heart of Warangal.2223 He lists more than twenty other trade centres of the period.2223 They run from Panugal and Jadcherla in Telangana to Tripurantakam, Velpuru, Ghantasala and Nellore on the coastal side.23

Trade ran through guilds. Inscriptions name several kinds of merchants:2425

  • the nakaramu (town merchants)
  • the svadesi and paradesi (local and visiting merchants)
  • the ubhaya-nanadesi, a body of travelling traders2425

One guild of 1269 held a licence to trade in certain goods in certain districts.2425 Weavers, oil-pressers, smiths and potters formed craft guilds of their own. They sold at the nearest fair.25

In 1282, members of the great Ayyavole guild came to Tripurantakam on guild business.26 Among them were men with reddi, nayudu and setti names. Parabrahma Sastry reads their visit as buying a trading licence.26 Goods moved on carts, asses, horses and pack-oxen.2728 An inscription of 1245 at Tripurantakam excuses the tax on 300 hired pack-oxen belonging to the temple.2728

Most retail trade, and much wholesale trade, was in the hands of the Komati merchants, also called settis.2930 Parabrahma Sastry notes that the Sumati Satakam calls the Komati the life of a town.2930 Kings and chiefs had their own royal settis.2930

The coast gave the Kakatiyas their link to the sea. In 1244–45 Ganapatideva set up an edict at Motupalli.31 It promised sea traders that wrecked cargoes would no longer be seized.31 It fixed customs at one part in thirty, with special rates for sandal, camphor, pearls, ivory, metals, silks, pepper and areca nuts.31

E. Hultzsch, who edited the edict, concluded that Motupalli was the kingdom’s chief port.32 Parabrahma Sastry argued, against K. A. Nilakanta Sastri, that this trade was not left only to foreigners.33 See the Motupalli inscription.

Marco Polo described a kingdom he called “Mutfili”.34 His editor Henry Yule identified it as the Kakatiya kingdom, named after Motupalli.34 Polo praised its cloth, “the best and most delicate buckrams”, which “look like tissue of spider’s web”.535 He also repeated an old legend about diamonds.535 In it, people threw meat down into deep valleys, and eagles carried the diamonds up with the meat.35

Tanks and new villages

In Telangana, the farming that fed all this trade depended on tanks. The 1909 Imperial Gazetteer explained why.1 The sandy soils of Telingana could not hold water. So dams were built across valleys and gorges to store the rain.1 Parabrahma Sastry credits Kakatiya kings, queens and their chiefs with founding many new villages on cleared forest land. Each often had its own tank.36

Two great lakes of the period were still watering thousands of acres in the 1970s.37 The Pakhal tank was built in Ganapatideva’s time by Jagadalu Mummadi, son of the minister Bayyana Nayaka.37 The Ramappa lake was made in 1213 by the general Recherla Rudra.37 Inscriptions counted building a tank among the seven good works, the sapta-santanas.38

In 1909 Pakhal was still the largest man-made lake in Hyderabad State, with a dam over 2,000 yards long.39 By then the state had 370 large tanks and over 11,000 smaller ones (kuntas).2 Former rulers and ministers had built most of the large ones.2 See also the Kakatiya period.

Reddis, Golconda and the European companies

After the fall of Warangal, at least one coastal ruler renewed the promise to sea traders. In 1358 Somaya was minister of Anavota, the Reddi ruler of Kondavidu.4041 Somaya issued a proclamation at Motupalli giving assurances to merchants who came to the port. It excused some duties and promised to charge the rest at the old rates.4041

Under the Qutb Shahi kings of Golconda, Dutch and English merchants wrote the fullest accounts. W. H. Moreland edited them.42 He describes a kingdom that lived mainly by farming. It grew rice, millets and pulses.42 Indigo and chay-root were grown as dyes for the weavers, and tobacco, then a new crop, for export.42

According to Moreland, the chief exports were cotton cloth and high-quality iron and steel.42 The iron and steel were made inland and shipped from Machilipatnam.42 Diamond mining at Kollur became important during the period.42 Indigo went to Persia and cotton yarn to Burma.43 Spices, metals, camphor, porcelain and silk came in, and the balance was paid in gold and silver.43

The weavers worked in their own houses.44 But they depended on advance payments from buyers, who could dictate what they made.44 Fine muslins for export were known by the name of Warangal.44

The English merchant William Methwold describes the Komati merchants.45 Some travelled into the countryside to collect calicoes from the weavers, and sold them in bulk in the ports. Others worked as money-changers.45 He saw local ships of up to 600 tons, well built of timber and iron.46 They sailed to Mocha, Achin in Sumatra, Arakan, Pegu and Tenasserim, and along the coast to Ceylon.46

The Dutch merchant Antony Schorer reports that Muslims, Portuguese and Hindus built ships on the river at Narasapur.47 Timber and iron were at hand there, and wages were low.47 Tavernier mentions ships carrying goods and pilgrims from Machilipatnam to Mocha, on the way to Mecca.48 The Golconda chronicle boasted that under Ibrahim Qutb Shah, “Tulingana, like Egypt, became the mart of the whole world”.49

The European companies settled along this coast. The English ship Globe opened trade at Machilipatnam in 1611.50 The Dutch opened a factory (trading post) at Palakollu in the mid-17th century.515253 It had a branch at Narasapur with an iron foundry.515253 The English took the northern suburb of Narasapur in 1677. Their factory at Madapollam gave its name to a kind of cotton cloth.515253

The Dutch held Bheemunipatnam (then Bimlipatam) until 1825.54 See Machilipatnam.

Golconda diamonds

The diamond mines made Golconda famous in Europe. The French jeweller Jean-Baptiste Tavernier visited them in the 1640s.55 Kollur on the Krishna lay seven days east of Golconda.555657 He says the great diamond that Mir Jumla presented to the Mughal emperor was found there.555657

On his first visit, some 60,000 men, women and children worked at Kollur.555657 The men dug, and the women and children carried earth.555657 His editor, Valentine Ball, corrected two details. The stone was given to Shah Jahan, not Aurangzeb.56 It weighed 900 ratis (an Indian unit of weight), not carats.56 Another mine, at Ramallakota south of Kurnool, then lay in the territory of the king of Bijapur.58

Tavernier describes how the business worked. Merchants rented a patch of ground and hired fifty or a hundred miners.59 They paid the king a daily fee, and two per cent on all purchases.59 The miners themselves earned only about three pagodas (gold coins) a year. Watchmen were posted to stop them swallowing stones.59

At the mines he watched the merchants’ sons, aged ten to sixteen, sitting under a tree each morning.60 They bought and graded stones, and then divided the profit among themselves.60 Tavernier was a gem dealer writing for buyers, and his figures should be read with that in mind. Ball also warned that his dates for the discovery of the mines were of “no value”.61

Company rule, the Nizam’s state and the railway

The weavers of the coast lost their export markets in the early 19th century.62 The Godavari gazetteer records that the East India Company used to buy some seven lakhs of rupees’ worth of local cloth a year, and in some years over ten.62 When that trade ended, the district’s cloth exports fell sharply.62 Their value was over fourteen lakhs in 1825–26, but under two lakhs in 1842–43.62

The Kistna manual says Machilipatnam had once sent chintzes and coloured cloth worth fifty lakhs a year to the Persian Gulf alone.63 By 1883 the trade was worth about half a lakh.63 The old shipyards declined too.64 At Tallarevu on the Coringa river, a hundred ships were said to have been built each year two generations before 1907. But none were built in 1905.64

Irrigation changed the deltas. Arthur Cotton’s dam across the Godavari was begun in 1847.65 It watered 662,000 acres by 1903–04.65 The irrigation engineer G. T. Walch printed figures on the district’s exports.66 They show exports rising from about nine lakhs of rupees in the year before the dam to nearly forty-eight lakhs in 1863–64.66 These are an official account of an official project.66

Credit stayed in the hands of local lenders.67 Under the jatti system, a cultivator borrowed against his crop.67 He agreed to sell the crop to the lender below the market price.67 In Visakhapatnam (then Vizagapatam) district, the ports of Bheemunipatnam and Visakhapatnam exported gingelly, jaggery, hides and manganese ore.6869 The ore was mined from 1892 and shipped to Europe and America.6869

In Hyderabad State, all the broad-gauge railways were built before 1891.70 Among them was the Nizam’s Guaranteed State Railway.70 It ran east from Hyderabad to Warangal and on to Vijayawada (then Bezwada), with a branch to the Singareni coalfield.70 The coalfield was worked from 1886. Its output rose from about 3,000 tons in 1887 to over 400,000 tons by 1901.71 The first spinning and weaving mill near Hyderabad opened in 1877.72

The state exported grain, cotton, oilseeds, indigo, hides and coal.73 It imported mill cloth, yarn, salt, sugar and metals.73 The gazetteer names the Komatis as the trading caste of Telingana, with Marwari traders in all the large villages.73 The village bania was grain-dealer, cloth-seller and banker, and lent money to the cultivator.73 The cast-steel cakes of Nirmal, Jagtial and Warangal had once been exported to distant parts.74

After 1947

The library’s papers for the years after independence deal with the economy mainly as part of an argument about the shape of the new states. In 1951, for example, a shortage of yarn drove about 2,000 weavers from Venkatagiri to Nellore.75

The States Reorganisation Commission of 1955 set out both sides on joining Telangana to Andhra.7677 For Vishalandhra, it cited unified control of the Krishna and Godavari projects and the trade links between the two regions.7677 Against it, it reported the fears of some Telangana leaders.7677

These leaders feared that union would exchange Telangana’s settled revenues for the money troubles of the Andhra State.7677 Telangana had a much higher land revenue and excise, of about five crores a year.7677 They also feared that Telangana would lose its own rights over the Krishna and Godavari waters planned for its Nandikonda and Kushtapuram projects.7677 What followed, including the 1969 inquiry into Telangana’s surplus revenues, is told on the page Andhra State & Andhra Pradesh. The library does not yet hold sources on the farming, industry or ports of the state after 1956.

Footnotes

  1. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Hyderabad State (1909), pp. 33–34 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  2. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 34 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  3. Wilfred H. Schoff (tr.), The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea (1912), § 62, p. 47 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  4. Jean-Baptiste Tavernier, tr. V. Ball, Travels in India, Vol. II (1889), pp. 72–74 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  5. Henry Yule and Henri Cordier, The Book of Ser Marco Polo, Vol. II (1903), p. 361 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  6. Schoff, Periplus (1912), p. 252 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  7. Robert Sewell, The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (1932), p. 9 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  8. Imperial Gazetteer of India: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 345 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  9. John A. C. Boswell, A Manual of the Nellore District (1873), pp. 688–689, citing the Madras Road Book of 1839 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  10. A. H. Longhurst, The Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda (1938), p. 15 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  11. Longhurst, Nagarjunakonda (1938), p. 6 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  12. Alexander Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities (1894), p. 20 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  13. James Burgess, The Buddhist Stupas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 82, inscription No. 28 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  14. Burgess, Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 86, inscription No. 47 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  15. Burgess, Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 105 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  16. Burgess, Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta (1887), p. 104, inscription No. 41 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  17. G. Bühler, “The Bhattiprolu Inscriptions”, Epigraphia Indica II (1894), pp. 327–328 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  18. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 248. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  19. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 248–249. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  20. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 242–243. ↩ ↩2

  21. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 247. ↩ ↩2

  22. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 252. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  23. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 253. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  24. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 242. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  25. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 243. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  26. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 245–246. ↩ ↩2

  27. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 250. ↩ ↩2

  28. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 251–252. ↩ ↩2

  29. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 244. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  30. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 244–245. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  31. E. Hultzsch, “Motupalli Pillar-Inscription of Ganapatideva”, Epigraphia Indica XII (1914), pp. 196–197 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  32. Hultzsch, “Motupalli Pillar-Inscription” (1914), p. 190 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  33. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 256. ↩

  34. Henry Yule and Henri Cordier, The Book of Ser Marco Polo, Vol. II (1903), p. 362, note 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  35. Yule and Cordier, Marco Polo, Vol. II (1903), pp. 360–361 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  36. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 198–199. ↩

  37. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), pp. 204–205. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  38. P. Sreenivasachar, A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts, Part I (1942), p. 30 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)); Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal (1978), p. 203. ↩

  39. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), pp. 90–91 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  40. J. Ramayya Pantulu (ed.), South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. X (1948), p. 304, No. 556 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  41. Sewell, Historical Inscriptions (1932), pp. 195, 199 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  42. W. H. Moreland (ed.), Relations of Golconda in the Early Seventeenth Century (1931), p. xviii (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  43. Moreland, Relations of Golconda (1931), pp. xix–xx (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  44. Moreland, Relations of Golconda (1931), pp. xviii–xix (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  45. Methwold’s Relation, in Moreland, Relations of Golconda (1931), p. 16 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  46. Methwold’s Relation, in Moreland, Relations of Golconda (1931), pp. 36–37 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  47. Schorer’s Relation, in Moreland, Relations of Golconda (1931), p. 63 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  48. Tavernier, Travels in India, Vol. I (1889), p. 162 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  49. Golconda chronicle, in Muhammad Qasim Ferishta, tr. John Briggs, History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India, Vol. III (1829), p. 446 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  50. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), pp. 324–325 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  51. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 327 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  52. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 326 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  53. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 323 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  54. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 261 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  55. Tavernier, Travels in India, Vol. II (1889), p. 72 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  56. Tavernier, Travels in India, Vol. II (1889), p. 74, with Ball’s notes (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  57. Tavernier, Travels in India, Vol. II (1889), p. 75 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  58. Tavernier, Travels in India, Vol. II (1889), p. 55 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  59. Tavernier, Travels in India, Vol. II (1889), pp. 59–60 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  60. Tavernier, Travels in India, Vol. II (1889), pp. 61–62 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  61. Ball’s note in Tavernier, Travels in India, Vol. II (1889), p. 72 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  62. F. R. Hemingway, Madras District Gazetteers: Godavari, Vol. I (1907), p. 103 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  63. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District (1883), pp. 118, 368 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  64. Hemingway, Godavari (1907), p. 110 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  65. Imperial Gazetteer: Madras, Vol. I (1908), p. 165 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  66. George T. Walch, The Engineering Works of the Godavari Delta (1896), appendix, p. v (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  67. Hemingway, Godavari (1907), p. 112 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  68. W. Francis, Madras District Gazetteers: Vizagapatam, Vol. I (1907), p. 129 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  69. Francis, Vizagapatam (1907), pp. 125–126 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  70. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 45 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  71. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 39 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  72. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 42 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  73. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 43 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  74. Imperial Gazetteer: Hyderabad (1909), p. 40 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  75. Census of India, 1951, Vol. III: Madras and Coorg, Part I: Report (1953), p. 19 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  76. Report of the States Reorganisation Commission (1955), p. 104 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  77. Report of the States Reorganisation Commission (1955), pp. 105–106 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

Photos

Show all (85)

References

Sources (25)
  1. Wilfred H. Schoff (tr.), The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea: Travel and Trade in the Indian Ocean by a Merchant of the First Century (opens in a new tab), Longmans, Green & Co., New York, 1912, pp. 47, 252. [Public domain]
  2. Robert Sewell (ed. S. Krishnaswami Aiyangar), The Historical Inscriptions of Southern India (Collected till 1923) and Outlines of Political History (opens in a new tab), University of Madras, 1932, pp. 9, 195, 199. [Public domain in India]
  3. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Madras, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1908, pp. 64–65, 165, 261, 323–327, 345. [Public domain]
  4. John A. C. Boswell, A Manual of the Nellore District in the Presidency of Madras (opens in a new tab), Government of Madras, 1873, pp. 688–689. [Public domain]
  5. A. H. Longhurst, The Buddhist Antiquities of Nagarjunakonda, Madras Presidency (Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India No. 54) (opens in a new tab), Manager of Publications, Delhi, 1938, pp. 6, 15. [Public domain in India]
  6. Alexander Rea, South Indian Buddhist Antiquities, including the Stupas of Bhattiprolu, Gudivada and Ghantasala and other Ancient Sites in the Krishna District (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras (Archaeological Survey of India), 1894, pp. 20. [Public domain]
  7. James Burgess, The Buddhist Stupas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta in the Krishna District, Madras Presidency, Surveyed in 1882 (opens in a new tab), Trübner & Co. for the Archaeological Survey of Southern India, 1887, pp. 82, 86, 104–105. [Public domain]
  8. Jas. Burgess (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. II (1894) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1894, pp. 327–328. [Public domain]
  9. P. V. Parabrahma Sastry, The Kakatiyas of Warangal, Government of Andhra Pradesh, 1978, pp. 198–199, 203–205, 242–257. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  10. Sten Konow (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XII (1913–14) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1914, pp. 190, 196–197. E. Hultzsch, 'Motupalli Pillar-Inscription of Ganapatideva'. [Public domain]
  11. Henry Yule and Henri Cordier (eds.), The Book of Ser Marco Polo the Venetian, Vol. II (3rd ed.) (opens in a new tab), John Murray, London, 1903, pp. 360–361. [Public domain]
  12. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions, Part I (Hyderabad Archaeological Series No. 13) (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1942, pp. 30. [Public domain in India]
  13. J. Ramayya Pantulu (ed.), South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. X: Telugu Inscriptions from the Madras Presidency (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India (Manager of Publications, Delhi), 1948, pp. 304 (No. 556). [Public domain in India]
  14. W. H. Moreland (ed.), Relations of Golconda in the Early Seventeenth Century (Hakluyt Society, 2nd ser., No. 66) (opens in a new tab), Hakluyt Society, London, 1931, xviii–xx, 16, 36–37, 63. Cite-only; paraphrased. Published 1931; the Dutch and English writers saw mainly the coast. [Public domain in India]
  15. Jean-Baptiste Tavernier (tr. V. Ball), Travels in India, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Macmillan & Co., London, 1889, pp. 162. [Public domain]
  16. Jean-Baptiste Tavernier (tr. V. Ball), Travels in India, Vol. II (opens in a new tab), Macmillan & Co., London, 1889, pp. 55, 59, 61–62, 72–75. [Public domain]
  17. Muhammad Qasim Ferishta (tr. John Briggs), History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India till the Year A.D. 1612, Vol. III (opens in a new tab), Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London, 1829, pp. 446. [Public domain]
  18. F. R. Hemingway, Madras District Gazetteers: Godavari, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1907, pp. 103, 110, 112. [Public domain]
  19. Gordon Mackenzie, A Manual of the Kistna District in the Presidency of Madras (opens in a new tab), Government of Madras (Lawrence Asylum Press), 1883, pp. 118, 205–206, 368. [Public domain]
  20. George T. Walch, The Engineering Works of the Godavari Delta: A Descriptive and Historical Account (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1896, appendix, p. v. [Public domain]
  21. W. Francis, Madras District Gazetteers: Vizagapatam, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1907, pp. 124–126, 129. [Public domain]
  22. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Hyderabad State (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1909, pp. 33–34, 39–40, 42–43, 45, 90–91. [Public domain]
  23. Raghbir Sahai (H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, Department of Commerce and Industries), Report on the Survey of the Hand Loom Weaving and Dyeing Industries in H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1933, pp. 2, 8. [Public domain]
  24. S. Venkateswaran, Census of India, 1951, Vol. III: Madras and Coorg, Part I - Report (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1953, pp. 19. [Public domain in India]
  25. States Reorganisation Commission (S. Fazl Ali, H. N. Kunzru, K. M. Panikkar), Report of the States Reorganisation Commission (opens in a new tab), Government of India (Manager of Publications, Delhi), 1955, pp. 104–106. [Public domain in India]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: