A new site, built from published sources. Spotted a mistake? Please tell us

Musunuri Nayakas

A family of Telugu military chiefs (nayakas) who led the recovery of the Telugu country from the Delhi Sultanate after the fall of Warangal in 1323. Prolaya Nayaka, from his hill capital at Rekapalli on the Godavari, freed the coast and gave back the Brahmin villages seized by the Delhi officers. His cousin Kapaya Nayaka took Warangal in the later 1330s and ruled as 'lord of the Andhra country'. He helped the founders of the Bahmani kingdom against Delhi, then lost Kaulas and Golconda to the Bahmanis, giving up the turquoise throne in 1365. He was overthrown by the Recherla Velamas in about 1368.

Swipe sideways to see the whole chart; tap a bar for details.

Each bar is a ruling power in its region; time runs left to right. Dashed = approximate dates. Select a bar for details.

12501275130013251350137514001425Kakatiyas (1163–1323 CE)KakatiyasNayakas, Reddis & Bahmanis (1323–1518 CE)Nayakas, Reddis & BahmanisVijayanagara & the Qutb Shahis (1336–1687 CE)TelanganaKakatiyasMusunuri NayakasDelhi Sultanate (Tughluqs)Bahmani SultanateRecherla Velamas (Padmanayakas)Coastal AndhraEastern Gangas of KalingaHaihayas of Kona and PalnaduReddis of RajahmundryKotas of DharanikotaVijayanagara EmpireTelugu Chodas of Pottapi and NelloreReddis of KondaveeduCholas of TanjoreMusunuri NayakasKakatiyasPandyasRayalaseemaPandyasVijayanagara EmpireTelugu Chodas of Pottapi and NelloreReddis of KondaveeduHoysalasKakatiyas12501275130013251350137514001425
Show as a list

Kakatiyas 1163–1323 CE

Telangana
Kakatiyas (c. 1163–1323 CE)
Coastal Andhra
Eastern Gangas of Kalinga (c. 537–1434 CE) · Haihayas of Kona and Palnadu (c. 1073–1364 CE) · Kotas of Dharanikota (c. 1100–1276 CE) · Telugu Chodas of Pottapi and Nellore (c. 1106–1316 CE) · Cholas of Tanjore (c. 1135–1264 CE) · Kakatiyas (c. 1185–1323 CE) · Pandyas (c. 1260–1264 CE)
Rayalaseema
Cholas of Tanjore (c. 985–1268 CE) · Pandyas (1285–1293 CE) · Telugu Chodas of Pottapi and Nellore (c. 1120–1268 CE) · Hoysalas (c. 1178–1342 CE) · Kakatiyas (c. 1250–1323 CE)

Nayakas, Reddis & Bahmanis 1323–1518 CE

Telangana
Musunuri Nayakas (c. 1336–1368 CE) · Delhi Sultanate (Tughluqs) (c. 1323–1336 CE) · Bahmani Sultanate (c. 1347–1518 CE) · Recherla Velamas (Padmanayakas) (c. 1361–1475 CE)
Coastal Andhra
Eastern Gangas of Kalinga (c. 537–1434 CE) · Haihayas of Kona and Palnadu (c. 1073–1364 CE) · Reddis of Rajahmundry (c. 1386–1448 CE) · Delhi Sultanate (Tughluqs) (c. 1323–1326 CE) · Vijayanagara Empire (c. 1350–1579 CE) · Reddis of Kondaveedu (c. 1325–1424 CE) · Musunuri Nayakas (c. 1325–1346 CE)
Rayalaseema
Vijayanagara Empire (c. 1336–1646 CE) · Reddis of Kondaveedu (c. 1346–1386 CE) · Hoysalas (c. 1178–1342 CE)

Vijayanagara & the Qutb Shahis 1336–1687 CE

Telangana
Musunuri Nayakas (c. 1336–1368 CE) · Bahmani Sultanate (c. 1347–1518 CE) · Recherla Velamas (Padmanayakas) (c. 1361–1475 CE)
Coastal Andhra
Eastern Gangas of Kalinga (c. 537–1434 CE) · Haihayas of Kona and Palnadu (c. 1073–1364 CE) · Reddis of Rajahmundry (c. 1386–1448 CE) · Vijayanagara Empire (c. 1350–1579 CE) · Reddis of Kondaveedu (c. 1325–1424 CE) · Musunuri Nayakas (c. 1325–1346 CE)
Rayalaseema
Vijayanagara Empire (c. 1336–1646 CE) · Reddis of Kondaveedu (c. 1346–1386 CE) · Hoysalas (c. 1178–1342 CE)
Kingdoms and empires Sultanates Uncertain or debated dates Held another region first This page

Reigns

Each bar is one ruler’s reign; time runs left to right. c. = approximate date.

  1. Prolaya Nayakac. 1325–1336 CE · c. 11 yrs
  2. Kapaya Nayakac. 1336–1368 CE · c. 32 yrs
Reign · c. = approximate date

No record dates either chief's accession or death. Prolaya's Vilasa grant is undated; its editors placed it between 1325 and the later 1330s, probably about 1330. Kapaya's Guraja grant of February 1346 names Prolaya as his predecessor. Kapaya's capture of Warangal is dated about 1336–37 by modern historians and 1343–44 by Ferishta; his end is placed in about 1368, between the Akkalapundi grant (1368) and the Inavolu inscription of the Recherla chief Anapota (July 1369).

Family tree

The rulers and the relatives who explain the succession. Every line rests on a cited statement on a person page; the sources are listed below the tree. Select a card to open that page.

  • parent and child
  • marriage
  • adoption
  • the sources disagree (see below)
  • brother or sister
  • order of succession
Family tree: Musunuri NayakasPotaEarliest known member ofthe Musunuri familyPochaPochaya-nayaka, father ofProlayaDevaFather of KapayaKamaRajaProlaya Nayakac. 1325–1336 CE1ErapotaKapaya Nayakac. 1336–1368 CE2MummadisaImmadisaDevaAnavotaLord of Toyyeru (ToyyetiAnavota)Sister of KapayaName not recordedDaughter ofKapaya's sisterName not recordedMummadi-nayaka ofKorukondaManchikonda family
  1. Generation 1

    • PotaEarliest known member of the Musunuri family
  2. Generation 2

    • PochaPochaya-nayaka, father of ProlayaSon of Pota
    • DevaFather of KapayaSon of Pota
    • KamaSon of Pota
    • RajaSon of Pota
  3. Generation 3

    • 1Prolaya Nayakac. 1325–1336 CESon of Pocha
    • ErapotaSon of Pocha
    • 2Kapaya Nayakac. 1336–1368 CESon of DevaBrother of Sister of Kapaya
    • Sister of KapayaName not recordedSister of Kapaya Nayaka
    • MummadisaSon of Deva
    • ImmadisaSon of Kama
    • DevaSon of Kama
    • AnavotaLord of Toyyeru (Toyyeti Anavota)Son of Raja
  4. Generation 4

    • Mummadi-nayaka of KorukondaManchikonda familyHusband of Daughter of Kapaya's sister
    • Daughter of Kapaya's sisterName not recordedDaughter of Sister of KapayaWife of Mummadi-nayaka of Korukonda

Where the sources disagree

Brothers or cousins?

Younger brother of Prolaya (Vilasa grant)

  • The Vilasa grant calls Kapaya-nayaka one of Prolaya's younger brothers. →
    1. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, "Vilasa Grant" (1957–58), p. 242 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.

First cousin, son of Pocha's brother Deva (Guraja grant)

  • Kapaya was therefore the son of Deva and a first cousin of Prolaya Nayaka. →
    1. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, "Vilasa Grant" (1957–58), p. 250 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
    2. N. Venkataramanayya and M. Somasekhara Sarma, "Vilasa Grant of Prolaya-nayaka", Epigraphia Indica XXXII (1957–58), p. 242 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
Sources for every line of the tree
  • Pota → Pocha, Deva, Kama and Raja (parent and child)
    • The grant gives the donor's pedigree for three generations: Pota, the first of the line, had four sons, Pocha, Deva, Kama and Raja. →
      1. Annual Report on South-Indian Epigraphy for 1934–35 (1938), p. 74 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
  • Pocha → Prolaya Nayaka and Erapota (parent and child)
    • Pocha's sons were Prola and Erapota, Deva's were Kapa and Mummadisa, Kama's were Immadisa and Deva, and Raja's son was Anavota, lord of Toyyeru. →
      1. Annual Report on South-Indian Epigraphy for 1934–35 (1938), p. 74 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
    • Prolaya's father was Pochaya-nayaka, who is named in the Pentapadu grant of the Telugu Choda chief Bhaktiraja. →
      1. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, "Vilasa Grant" (1957–58), p. 253 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
      2. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, "Vilasa Grant" (1957–58), p. 254 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
  • Deva → Kapaya Nayaka and Mummadisa (parent and child)
    • Pocha's sons were Prola and Erapota, Deva's were Kapa and Mummadisa, Kama's were Immadisa and Deva, and Raja's son was Anavota, lord of Toyyeru. →
      1. Annual Report on South-Indian Epigraphy for 1934–35 (1938), p. 74 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
  • Kama → Immadisa and Deva (parent and child)
    • Pocha's sons were Prola and Erapota, Deva's were Kapa and Mummadisa, Kama's were Immadisa and Deva, and Raja's son was Anavota, lord of Toyyeru. →
      1. Annual Report on South-Indian Epigraphy for 1934–35 (1938), p. 74 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
  • Raja → Anavota (parent and child)
    • Pocha's sons were Prola and Erapota, Deva's were Kapa and Mummadisa, Kama's were Immadisa and Deva, and Raja's son was Anavota, lord of Toyyeru. →
      1. Annual Report on South-Indian Epigraphy for 1934–35 (1938), p. 74 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
  • Prolaya Nayaka · Kapaya Nayaka (brother or sister) · sources disagree
    • The Vilasa grant calls Kapaya-nayaka one of Prolaya's younger brothers. →
      1. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, "Vilasa Grant" (1957–58), p. 242 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased.
  • Kapaya Nayaka · Sister of Kapaya (brother or sister)
    • According to the Akkalapundi grant of 1368, Kapaya-nayaka, "the famous Suratrana" (sultan) of the Andhra country, gave his sister's daughter in marriage to Mummadi-nayaka of Korukonda. →
      1. Rama Sastri, "Akkalapundi Grant" (1916), p. 272, translation, verse 25 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)).
  • Sister of Kapaya → Daughter of Kapaya's sister (parent and child)
    • According to the Akkalapundi grant of 1368, Kapaya-nayaka, "the famous Suratrana" (sultan) of the Andhra country, gave his sister's daughter in marriage to Mummadi-nayaka of Korukonda. →
      1. Rama Sastri, "Akkalapundi Grant" (1916), p. 272, translation, verse 25 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)).
  • Mummadi-nayaka of Korukonda · Daughter of Kapaya's sister (marriage)
    • According to the Akkalapundi grant of 1368, Kapaya-nayaka, "the famous Suratrana" (sultan) of the Andhra country, gave his sister's daughter in marriage to Mummadi-nayaka of Korukonda. →
      1. Rama Sastri, "Akkalapundi Grant" (1916), p. 272, translation, verse 25 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)).

A line from one parent only means that the cited sources name no other parent.

The Musunuri Nayakas were a family of Telugu warrior chiefs.123 They led the recovery of the Telugu country from the Delhi Sultanate in the years after Warangal fell in 1323.123 Only two of them, Prolaya Nayaka and his cousin Kapaya Nayaka, are known from their own records.123

Their story was pieced together in the twentieth century from a handful of copper plates and stone inscriptions, and from the Persian histories of Delhi and the Deccan.123 The family was of the fourth caste, the Sudras.45 It bore the Telugu title nayaka (military chief), which the officers of the Kakatiya kings had held.45 The Kakatiya background and the Delhi conquest are told on the pages of the Kakatiyas and of the Delhi Sultanate in the Telugu country.

The sources

Five kinds of evidence are used:

  • The Vilasa grant of Prolaya Nayaka is a Sanskrit copper-plate charter of about 1330, published only in 1957–58.67 It is the one record issued by Prolaya himself.67
  • Kapaya’s Guraja grant of February 1346 gives the family’s pedigree.89
  • Stone inscriptions of his reign survive at Ganapesvaram (Saka 1268, that is 1346–47; Saka is an Indian way of counting years) and at Pillalamarri, where one of his servants set up a record in 1357.710
  • Copper plates of neighbouring families mention Kapaya or both chiefs. They are the Akkalapundi grant of 1368 and the Kaluvacheru grant of the Reddi queen Anitalli of 1423.112
  • The Persian historians Barani, Ferishta and the author of the Burhan-i Ma’asir describe a Hindu leader of Warangal under the names Kanya Naik, Krishna Naik and Kanabayand.121314 Modern historians identify this leader with Kapaya.7

Prolaya Nayaka and the coast

The Vilasa grant gives a vivid picture of the country after the Delhi conquest.415 It says that when Prataparudra died on the way to Delhi, the land was plunged into the “darkness” of the Turushkas (Turks).415 The rich were tortured for their wealth, and Brahmins were forced to give up their rites.415 Temples were desecrated, and the villages granted to scholars were seized.415

Then Prola of the Musunuri family took up the rule of the earth.415 The grant says that he was born as a portion of the god Vishnu.415 He drove out the Yavanas (foreigners) from their forts and gave back the Brahmins’ villages.415 He made his capital at Rekapalli, on the Godavari at the foot of the Malyavanta hill.157 He left the administration to his younger brothers, among them Kapaya-nayaka.157 See Rekapalli.

The editors of the grant drew on other records of the time to show that Prolaya headed a group of allied chiefs.16 The Pentapadu grant of the Telugu Choda Bhaktiraja says that the Yavanas had seized the Andhra country.16 Then Prolaya-nayaka, son of Pochaya-nayaka, and a chief named Venga retired to a forest fort among the hills.16 Together they won the country back, destroying the Turushka horsemen in battle.16

The editors took these chiefs to have been among his allies:171819

  • Prolaya Vema, the founder of the Reddi kingdom171819
  • Kolani Rudradeva171819
  • Anna-mantri of Bendapudi171819
  • the Recherla chief Singaya-nayaka171819

In their reconstruction the coastal plain had fallen to Delhi by September 1324, when Ulugh Khan’s officer built the great mosque at Rajahmundry.1816 A Reddi record of October 1325 marks the turn of the tide.1816 A record of 1326 marks the completion of the recovery of the coast.1816 See the Reddis of Kondavidu.

Kapaya Nayaka and Warangal

According to his own grant, Kapaya Nayaka was Prolaya’s cousin.92 He succeeded Prolaya and took Warangal from the Delhi governors.92 Barani’s history of the reign of Muhammad bin Tughluq records that “a revolt broke out among the Hindus at Arangal”.12 “Kanya Naik had gathered strength in the country. Malik Makbul, the naib-wazir, fled to Dehli, and the Hindus took possession of Arangal, which was thus entirely lost.”12

Ferishta tells the story differently.13 In AH 744 (1343–44; AH is the Islamic way of counting years), he says, “Krishn Naig, the son of Luddur Dew, who lived near Wurungole”, persuaded “Bilal Dew, Raja of the Carnatic” to join a rising of the Hindus.13 Robert Sewell names the Hoysala Ballala princes as Krishna’s allies in this rising.20 With an army lent by Bilal Dew, Krishn Naig “reduced Wurungole, and compelled Imad-ool-Moolk, the governor, to retreat to Dowlutabad”.13 Modern historians read the Persian names as forms of Kapaya’s.721 They place the capture of Warangal in about 1336–37.721 See Warangal.

Kapaya’s inscriptions call him “lord of the Andhra country” and lord of the city of Anumanamgallu.1022 The Pillalamarri inscription of 1357 records that his servant Era-Potu-lemka restored the image of the god Erakesvara.1022 “Sultan Alavadin” had damaged it in the disturbances of the time.1022

A neighbouring family boasted of its link with him.1123 According to the Akkalapundi grant of 1368, Mummadi-nayaka of Korukonda married Kapaya’s sister’s daughter.1123 The grant calls Kapaya the “Sultan of the Andhra country”.1123

The Bahmanis

When the officers of the Deccan rose against Muhammad bin Tughluq, the ruler of Telingana helped them.24 Ferishta says that Zafar Khan, the future first Bahmani sultan, defeated the royal army at Bidar after “being joined by fifteen thousand infantry, sent by the Raja of Tulingana”.24

The Burhan-i Ma’asir says that soon after Bahman Shah’s accession his general Sikandar Khan wrote to “Kanabayand, who was wali of Telingana”, asking for elephants.1425 Kanabayand submitted and met him.1425 He sent two elephants and other presents to the sultan.1425

Ferishta says that Bahman Shah took Kaulas from the Raja of Warangal and made an alliance with him.2627 The raja was treated with forbearance (patience) for his earlier help.2627 He agreed to pay the tribute he had paid to Delhi.2627 See Kaulas and the Bahmanis.

Under Bahman Shah’s son Muhammad Shah I the alliance broke down. In Ferishta’s account the rajas of Vijayanagara and Telingana demanded the return of the lands taken by the late sultan.28 The Raja of Telingana sent his son Vinaik Dew with an army to recover Kaulas.28 Bahadur Khan defeated it, and forced the raja to pay a large sum and twenty-five elephants.28

Then the sultan heard that Vinaik Dew had seized horses meant for him at Velumputtun.2930 He raided the town with four thousand horse and took the prince.2930 He had him thrown from a catapult into a fire.2930 The retreat cost him most of his men.31 Gribble calls the prince Nagdeo.32 Haig names him Venayek Deva, and the town Vailampallam, his fief “on the sea coast”.33

The war ended with the loss of Golconda. Muhammad Shah sent one army against Golconda and another against Warangal, and spent nearly two years in Telingana.3435 The raja retired to the woods.3435 At last he gave three hundred elephants, two hundred horses and thirty-three lakhs of rupees.3435 He also gave up “in perpetuity the hill-fort of Golconda, with its dependencies”.3435

The sultan then signed a treaty “fixing Golconda as the boundary between his kingdom and the Raja’s possessions”.353637 The raja’s envoys presented a jewelled throne, first made as a gift for Muhammad bin Tughluq.353637 The sultan named it the Takht-i-Feroza.353637 Briggs renders the name as the “cerulean throne”, and Haig as the “turquoise throne”.353637

Haig dates the sultan’s first sitting on this throne at Gulbarga to 21 March 1365.37 The Imperial Gazetteer dates the cession of Golconda to 1364.38 See Golconda.

The end

The Recherla Velamas challenged Kapaya’s power from within Telangana.3940 V. Yashoda Devi describes a first clash in which the Recherla chief Singama Nayaka defeated Kapaya.3940 In a final war, she says, Singama’s son Anapota Nayaka marched on Warangal and defeated and killed Kapaya in a battle at Bhimavaram.3940

She dates the battle to 1368.41421143 That is between the Akkalapundi grant, in which Kapaya is still the “Sultan of the Andhra country”, and the Inavolu inscription of July 1369.41421143 In the Inavolu inscription Anapota rules Orugallu, Tribhuvanagiri and Rajukonda.41421143 The Akkalapundi grant is dated Saka 1290 (1368–69), though she gives its date as 1366.41421143

The editors of the Vilasa grant summarised the Kaluvacheru grant of 1423.2 It says that after Kapaya’s death the seventy-five nayakas who had served him went to their own towns and ruled their own countries.2 See the Recherla Velamas and the Inavolu inscription.

Evidence and disagreements

  • Who freed the country. The Vilasa grant, and the Kaluvacheru grant as read by the editors of the Vilasa grant, give the credit to Prolaya.42 In 1916 K. Rama Sastri, following H. Krishna Sastri, cited a grant published in the Journal of the Telugu Academy, the Kaluvacheru grant.443 He cited it as saying that Kapaya “rescued the Andhra country from the ravages of the Muhammadans, immediately after the death of the Kakatiya king Prataparudra”.443 Barani and Ferishta name only the leader of the rising at Warangal.1213
  • Prolaya and Kapaya. The Vilasa grant makes them brothers.15 The pedigree of Kapaya’s Guraja grant, followed by the editors of the Vilasa grant, makes them first cousins.92 Krishna Sastri, as cited by Rama Sastri, made them father and son.44 M. Somasekhara Sarma in 1931 thought them possibly unrelated.45
  • Kapaya and the Persian names. Barani’s Kanya Naik, Ferishta’s Krishn Naig “son of Luddur Dew” and the Burhan-i Ma’asir’s Kanabayand were identified with Kapaya by Somasekhara Sarma (1931) and by the editors of the Vilasa grant.467 Haig (1928) took Krishna or Kanhayya Naik for “apparently a scion of the Kakatiyas”.47
  • The capture of Warangal. Yashoda Devi dates it about 1336–37, and the editors of the Vilasa grant before 1339.217 The epigraphist’s report of 1934–35 puts it after 1335.9 Ferishta gives AH 744, 1343–44.13 In 1931 Somasekhara Sarma put it in 1345–46.48
  • The Bahmani war. Briggs’s Ferishta dates the seizure of the horses to the end of AH 773 (1371), which would be after the cession of Golconda.28 Haig dates it to 1362.33 The terms also differ: thirty-three lakhs of rupees in Briggs, and 1,300,000 huns in Haig.3437
  • Kapaya’s end. Yashoda Devi, after the Velama chronicle, has him killed by Anapota at Bhimavaram about 1368.4041 No public-domain source read for this page describes his death.4041

Footnotes

  1. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant” (1957–58), p. 249 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  2. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant” (1957–58), p. 250 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11

  3. M. Somasekhara Sarma, “Kapaya Nayaka”, Journal of the Andhra Historical Research Society V (1931), pp. 217–218 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  4. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant” (1957–58), p. 241 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10

  5. Somasekhara Sarma, “Kapaya Nayaka” (1931), pp. 228–229 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2

  6. N. Venkataramanayya and M. Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant of Prolaya-nayaka”, Epigraphia Indica XXXII (1957–58), p. 239 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2

  7. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant” (1957–58), p. 256 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10

  8. Annual Report on South-Indian Epigraphy for the Year ending 31st March 1935 (1938), p. 73, para. 52 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩

  9. Annual Report on South-Indian Epigraphy for 1934–35 (1938), p. 74 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  10. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts, Part II (1940), p. 113, No. 40 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  11. K. Rama Sastri, “Akkalapundi Grant of Singaya-nayaka; Saka-Samvat 1290”, Epigraphia Indica XIII (1915–16), p. 260 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8

  12. H. M. Elliot and John Dowson, The History of India as Told by Its Own Historians, Vol. III (1871), p. 245, Barani’s Tarikh-i Firoz Shahi (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  13. Muhammad Qasim Ferishta, tr. John Briggs, History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India, Vol. I (1829), p. 427 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  14. J. S. King, The History of the Bahmani Dynasty, founded on the Burhan-i Ma’asir (1900), p. 9 and notes 15–17 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  15. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant” (1957–58), p. 242 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10

  16. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant” (1957–58), p. 253 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  17. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant” (1957–58), p. 251 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  18. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant” (1957–58), p. 252 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8

  19. Venkataramanayya and Somasekhara Sarma, “Vilasa Grant” (1957–58), p. 254 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  20. Robert Sewell, A Forgotten Empire (Vijayanagar) (1900), p. 26 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  21. V. Yashoda Devi, After the Kakatiyas (1975), p. 49. Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  22. Sreenivasachar, Corpus, Part II (1940), p. 114, No. 40, translation (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  23. Rama Sastri, “Akkalapundi Grant” (1916), p. 272, translation, verse 25 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  24. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Rise of the Mahomedan Power, Vol. II (1829), p. 289 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  25. King, History of the Bahmani Dynasty (1900), p. 10 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  26. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Vol. II (1829), p. 293 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  27. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Vol. II (1829), p. 294 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  28. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Vol. II (1829), p. 301 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  29. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Vol. II (1829), p. 302 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  30. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Vol. II (1829), p. 303 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  31. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Vol. II (1829), p. 304 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  32. J. D. B. Gribble, A History of the Deccan, Vol. I (1896), p. 37 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  33. Haig, Cambridge History of India, Vol. III (1928), p. 379 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2

  34. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Vol. II (1829), p. 305 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  35. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Vol. II (1829), p. 306 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8

  36. Ferishta, tr. Briggs, Vol. II (1829), p. 307 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  37. Haig, Cambridge History of India, Vol. III (1928), p. 380 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  38. Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Hyderabad State (1909), p. 114 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  39. Yashoda Devi, After the Kakatiyas (1975), p. 52. Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  40. Yashoda Devi, After the Kakatiyas (1975), pp. 63–64. Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  41. Yashoda Devi, After the Kakatiyas (1975), p. 65. Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  42. K. Rama Sastri, “Akkalapundi Grant of Singaya-nayaka; Saka-Samvat 1290”, Epigraphia Indica XIII (1915–16), p. 259 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  43. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of Andhra Pradesh, Part III (1956), p. 119, No. Wg. 1 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Paraphrased. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  44. Rama Sastri, “Akkalapundi Grant” (1916), p. 261 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  45. Somasekhara Sarma, “Kapaya Nayaka” (1931), pp. 226–227 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩

  46. Somasekhara Sarma, “Kapaya Nayaka” (1931), pp. 230–232 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩

  47. Wolseley Haig (ed.), The Cambridge History of India, Vol. III (1928), p. 169 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). ↩

  48. Somasekhara Sarma, “Kapaya Nayaka” (1931), p. 228 (archive.org (opens in a new tab)). Cite-only; paraphrased. ↩

Photos

References

Sources (16)
  1. D. C. Sircar and B. Ch. Chhabra (eds.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XXXII (1957–58) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, 1959, pp. 239–257. N. Venkataramanayya and M. Somasekhara Sarma, Vilasa grant of Prolaya-nayaka (No. 30). Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  2. Madras Government (Superintendent for Epigraphy, Southern Circle), Annual Report on South-Indian Epigraphy for the Year ending 31st March 1935 (opens in a new tab), Government Press, Madras, 1938, pp. 73–74. Guraja (Prolavaram) grant of Kapaya-nayaka, C.P. No. 3 of 1934-35. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  3. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of H.E.H. the Nizam's Dominions, Part II: Texts and Translations (opens in a new tab), H.E.H. the Nizam's Government, 1940, pp. 113–114. No. 40, Pillalamarri inscription of the reign of Kapaya-nayaka. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  4. Sten Konow (ed.), Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XIII (1915–16) (opens in a new tab), Archaeological Survey of India, Calcutta, 1916, pp. 259–261, 272. K. Rama Sastri, Akkalapundi grant of Singaya-nayaka (No. 24). [Public domain]
  5. P. Sreenivasachar (ed.), A Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of Andhra Pradesh, Part III (opens in a new tab), Government of Andhra Pradesh, 1956, pp. 119. No. Wg. 1, Inavolu inscription of Anapota-nayaka. Paraphrased. [Public domain in India]
  6. H. M. Elliot and John Dowson (eds.), The History of India as Told by Its Own Historians: The Muhammadan Period, Vol. III (opens in a new tab), Trübner and Co., London, 1871, pp. 245, 367. [Public domain]
  7. Muhammad Qasim Ferishta (tr. John Briggs), History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India till the Year A.D. 1612, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London, 1829, pp. 427. [Public domain]
  8. Muhammad Qasim Ferishta (tr. John Briggs), History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India till the Year A.D. 1612, Vol. II (opens in a new tab), Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London, 1829, pp. 289, 293–294, 301–307. [Public domain]
  9. J. S. King, The History of the Bahmani Dynasty, founded on the Burhan-i Ma'asir (opens in a new tab), Luzac and Co., London, 1900, pp. 9–10. [Public domain]
  10. Wolseley Haig (ed.), The Cambridge History of India, Vol. III: Turks and Afghans (opens in a new tab), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1928, pp. 169–170, 372–373, 375, 378–380. [Public domain]
  11. J. D. B. Gribble, A History of the Deccan, Vol. I (opens in a new tab), Luzac & Co., London, 1896, pp. 19–20, 37–39. [Public domain]
  12. Government of India, Imperial Gazetteer of India, Provincial Series: Hyderabad State (opens in a new tab), Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, 1909, pp. 114. [Public domain]
  13. M. Somasekhara Sarma, Kapaya Nayaka, Journal of the Andhra Historical Research Society, Vol. V (1931), pp. 217-232 (opens in a new tab), Andhra Historical Research Society, Rajahmundry, 1931, pp. 217–232. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  14. V. Yashoda Devi, After the Kakatiyas (opens in a new tab), Andhra Pradesh Sahitya Akademi, Hyderabad, 1975, pp. 49–52, 62–65. Cite-only; paraphrased. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  15. M. Somasekhara Sarma, A Forgotten Chapter of Andhra History (History of the Musunuri Nayaks) (opens in a new tab), Andhra University, 1945. The standard monograph (cite-only); not read page by page for these drafts. [All rights reserved (cited, not reproduced)]
  16. Robert Sewell, A Forgotten Empire (Vijayanagar): A Contribution to the History of India (scan of the 1900 edition) (opens in a new tab), Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1900. [Public domain]

Spotted an error on this page? Tell us

Last updated: